Cargando…
Deep learning–based velocity antialiasing of 4D‐flow MRI
PURPOSE: To develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) for the robust and fast correction of velocity aliasing in 4D‐flow MRI. METHODS: This study included 667 adult subjects with aortic 4D‐flow MRI data with existing velocity aliasing (n = 362) and no velocity aliasing (n = 305). Additionally, 10...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9050855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35381116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29205 |
_version_ | 1784696454464405504 |
---|---|
author | Berhane, Haben Scott, Michael B. Barker, Alex J. McCarthy, Patrick Avery, Ryan Allen, Brad Malaisrie, Chris Robinson, Joshua D. Rigsby, Cynthia K. Markl, Michael |
author_facet | Berhane, Haben Scott, Michael B. Barker, Alex J. McCarthy, Patrick Avery, Ryan Allen, Brad Malaisrie, Chris Robinson, Joshua D. Rigsby, Cynthia K. Markl, Michael |
author_sort | Berhane, Haben |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) for the robust and fast correction of velocity aliasing in 4D‐flow MRI. METHODS: This study included 667 adult subjects with aortic 4D‐flow MRI data with existing velocity aliasing (n = 362) and no velocity aliasing (n = 305). Additionally, 10 controls received back‐to‐back 4D‐flow scans with systemically varied velocity‐encoding sensitivity (vencs) at 60, 100, and 175 cm/s. The no‐aliasing data sets were used to simulate velocity aliasing by reducing the venc to 40%–70% of the original, alongside a ground truth locating all aliased voxels (153 training, 152 testing). The 152 simulated and 362 existing aliasing data sets were used for testing and compared with a conventional velocity antialiasing algorithm. Dice scores were calculated to quantify CNN performance. For controls, the venc 175‐cm/s scans were used as the ground truth and compared with the CNN‐corrected venc 60 and 100 cm/s data sets RESULTS: The CNN required 176 ± 30 s to perform compared with 162 ± 14 s for the conventional algorithm. The CNN showed excellent performance for the simulated data compared with the conventional algorithm (median range of Dice scores CNN: [0.89–0.99], conventional algorithm: [0.84–0.94], p < 0.001, across all simulated vencs) and detected more aliased voxels in existing velocity aliasing data sets (median detected CNN: 159 voxels [31–605], conventional algorithm: 65 [7–417], p < 0.001). For controls, the CNN showed Dice scores of 0.98 [0.95–0.99] and 0.96 [0.87–0.99] for venc = 60 cm/s and 100 cm/s, respectively, while flow comparisons showed moderate‐excellent agreement. CONCLUSION: Deep learning enabled fast and robust velocity anti‐aliasing in 4D‐flow MRI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9050855 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90508552022-10-14 Deep learning–based velocity antialiasing of 4D‐flow MRI Berhane, Haben Scott, Michael B. Barker, Alex J. McCarthy, Patrick Avery, Ryan Allen, Brad Malaisrie, Chris Robinson, Joshua D. Rigsby, Cynthia K. Markl, Michael Magn Reson Med Research Articles—Computer Processing and Modeling PURPOSE: To develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) for the robust and fast correction of velocity aliasing in 4D‐flow MRI. METHODS: This study included 667 adult subjects with aortic 4D‐flow MRI data with existing velocity aliasing (n = 362) and no velocity aliasing (n = 305). Additionally, 10 controls received back‐to‐back 4D‐flow scans with systemically varied velocity‐encoding sensitivity (vencs) at 60, 100, and 175 cm/s. The no‐aliasing data sets were used to simulate velocity aliasing by reducing the venc to 40%–70% of the original, alongside a ground truth locating all aliased voxels (153 training, 152 testing). The 152 simulated and 362 existing aliasing data sets were used for testing and compared with a conventional velocity antialiasing algorithm. Dice scores were calculated to quantify CNN performance. For controls, the venc 175‐cm/s scans were used as the ground truth and compared with the CNN‐corrected venc 60 and 100 cm/s data sets RESULTS: The CNN required 176 ± 30 s to perform compared with 162 ± 14 s for the conventional algorithm. The CNN showed excellent performance for the simulated data compared with the conventional algorithm (median range of Dice scores CNN: [0.89–0.99], conventional algorithm: [0.84–0.94], p < 0.001, across all simulated vencs) and detected more aliased voxels in existing velocity aliasing data sets (median detected CNN: 159 voxels [31–605], conventional algorithm: 65 [7–417], p < 0.001). For controls, the CNN showed Dice scores of 0.98 [0.95–0.99] and 0.96 [0.87–0.99] for venc = 60 cm/s and 100 cm/s, respectively, while flow comparisons showed moderate‐excellent agreement. CONCLUSION: Deep learning enabled fast and robust velocity anti‐aliasing in 4D‐flow MRI. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-05 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9050855/ /pubmed/35381116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29205 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles—Computer Processing and Modeling Berhane, Haben Scott, Michael B. Barker, Alex J. McCarthy, Patrick Avery, Ryan Allen, Brad Malaisrie, Chris Robinson, Joshua D. Rigsby, Cynthia K. Markl, Michael Deep learning–based velocity antialiasing of 4D‐flow MRI |
title | Deep learning–based velocity antialiasing of 4D‐flow MRI
|
title_full | Deep learning–based velocity antialiasing of 4D‐flow MRI
|
title_fullStr | Deep learning–based velocity antialiasing of 4D‐flow MRI
|
title_full_unstemmed | Deep learning–based velocity antialiasing of 4D‐flow MRI
|
title_short | Deep learning–based velocity antialiasing of 4D‐flow MRI
|
title_sort | deep learning–based velocity antialiasing of 4d‐flow mri |
topic | Research Articles—Computer Processing and Modeling |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9050855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35381116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29205 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT berhanehaben deeplearningbasedvelocityantialiasingof4dflowmri AT scottmichaelb deeplearningbasedvelocityantialiasingof4dflowmri AT barkeralexj deeplearningbasedvelocityantialiasingof4dflowmri AT mccarthypatrick deeplearningbasedvelocityantialiasingof4dflowmri AT averyryan deeplearningbasedvelocityantialiasingof4dflowmri AT allenbrad deeplearningbasedvelocityantialiasingof4dflowmri AT malaisriechris deeplearningbasedvelocityantialiasingof4dflowmri AT robinsonjoshuad deeplearningbasedvelocityantialiasingof4dflowmri AT rigsbycynthiak deeplearningbasedvelocityantialiasingof4dflowmri AT marklmichael deeplearningbasedvelocityantialiasingof4dflowmri |