Cargando…

Deep learning–based velocity antialiasing of 4D‐flow MRI

PURPOSE: To develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) for the robust and fast correction of velocity aliasing in 4D‐flow MRI. METHODS: This study included 667 adult subjects with aortic 4D‐flow MRI data with existing velocity aliasing (n = 362) and no velocity aliasing (n = 305). Additionally, 10...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berhane, Haben, Scott, Michael B., Barker, Alex J., McCarthy, Patrick, Avery, Ryan, Allen, Brad, Malaisrie, Chris, Robinson, Joshua D., Rigsby, Cynthia K., Markl, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9050855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35381116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29205
_version_ 1784696454464405504
author Berhane, Haben
Scott, Michael B.
Barker, Alex J.
McCarthy, Patrick
Avery, Ryan
Allen, Brad
Malaisrie, Chris
Robinson, Joshua D.
Rigsby, Cynthia K.
Markl, Michael
author_facet Berhane, Haben
Scott, Michael B.
Barker, Alex J.
McCarthy, Patrick
Avery, Ryan
Allen, Brad
Malaisrie, Chris
Robinson, Joshua D.
Rigsby, Cynthia K.
Markl, Michael
author_sort Berhane, Haben
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) for the robust and fast correction of velocity aliasing in 4D‐flow MRI. METHODS: This study included 667 adult subjects with aortic 4D‐flow MRI data with existing velocity aliasing (n = 362) and no velocity aliasing (n = 305). Additionally, 10 controls received back‐to‐back 4D‐flow scans with systemically varied velocity‐encoding sensitivity (vencs) at 60, 100, and 175 cm/s. The no‐aliasing data sets were used to simulate velocity aliasing by reducing the venc to 40%–70% of the original, alongside a ground truth locating all aliased voxels (153 training, 152 testing). The 152 simulated and 362 existing aliasing data sets were used for testing and compared with a conventional velocity antialiasing algorithm. Dice scores were calculated to quantify CNN performance. For controls, the venc 175‐cm/s scans were used as the ground truth and compared with the CNN‐corrected venc 60 and 100 cm/s data sets RESULTS: The CNN required 176 ± 30 s to perform compared with 162 ± 14 s for the conventional algorithm. The CNN showed excellent performance for the simulated data compared with the conventional algorithm (median range of Dice scores CNN: [0.89–0.99], conventional algorithm: [0.84–0.94], p < 0.001, across all simulated vencs) and detected more aliased voxels in existing velocity aliasing data sets (median detected CNN: 159 voxels [31–605], conventional algorithm: 65 [7–417], p < 0.001). For controls, the CNN showed Dice scores of 0.98 [0.95–0.99] and 0.96 [0.87–0.99] for venc = 60 cm/s and 100 cm/s, respectively, while flow comparisons showed moderate‐excellent agreement. CONCLUSION: Deep learning enabled fast and robust velocity anti‐aliasing in 4D‐flow MRI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9050855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90508552022-10-14 Deep learning–based velocity antialiasing of 4D‐flow MRI Berhane, Haben Scott, Michael B. Barker, Alex J. McCarthy, Patrick Avery, Ryan Allen, Brad Malaisrie, Chris Robinson, Joshua D. Rigsby, Cynthia K. Markl, Michael Magn Reson Med Research Articles—Computer Processing and Modeling PURPOSE: To develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) for the robust and fast correction of velocity aliasing in 4D‐flow MRI. METHODS: This study included 667 adult subjects with aortic 4D‐flow MRI data with existing velocity aliasing (n = 362) and no velocity aliasing (n = 305). Additionally, 10 controls received back‐to‐back 4D‐flow scans with systemically varied velocity‐encoding sensitivity (vencs) at 60, 100, and 175 cm/s. The no‐aliasing data sets were used to simulate velocity aliasing by reducing the venc to 40%–70% of the original, alongside a ground truth locating all aliased voxels (153 training, 152 testing). The 152 simulated and 362 existing aliasing data sets were used for testing and compared with a conventional velocity antialiasing algorithm. Dice scores were calculated to quantify CNN performance. For controls, the venc 175‐cm/s scans were used as the ground truth and compared with the CNN‐corrected venc 60 and 100 cm/s data sets RESULTS: The CNN required 176 ± 30 s to perform compared with 162 ± 14 s for the conventional algorithm. The CNN showed excellent performance for the simulated data compared with the conventional algorithm (median range of Dice scores CNN: [0.89–0.99], conventional algorithm: [0.84–0.94], p < 0.001, across all simulated vencs) and detected more aliased voxels in existing velocity aliasing data sets (median detected CNN: 159 voxels [31–605], conventional algorithm: 65 [7–417], p < 0.001). For controls, the CNN showed Dice scores of 0.98 [0.95–0.99] and 0.96 [0.87–0.99] for venc = 60 cm/s and 100 cm/s, respectively, while flow comparisons showed moderate‐excellent agreement. CONCLUSION: Deep learning enabled fast and robust velocity anti‐aliasing in 4D‐flow MRI. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-05 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9050855/ /pubmed/35381116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29205 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles—Computer Processing and Modeling
Berhane, Haben
Scott, Michael B.
Barker, Alex J.
McCarthy, Patrick
Avery, Ryan
Allen, Brad
Malaisrie, Chris
Robinson, Joshua D.
Rigsby, Cynthia K.
Markl, Michael
Deep learning–based velocity antialiasing of 4D‐flow MRI
title Deep learning–based velocity antialiasing of 4D‐flow MRI
title_full Deep learning–based velocity antialiasing of 4D‐flow MRI
title_fullStr Deep learning–based velocity antialiasing of 4D‐flow MRI
title_full_unstemmed Deep learning–based velocity antialiasing of 4D‐flow MRI
title_short Deep learning–based velocity antialiasing of 4D‐flow MRI
title_sort deep learning–based velocity antialiasing of 4d‐flow mri
topic Research Articles—Computer Processing and Modeling
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9050855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35381116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29205
work_keys_str_mv AT berhanehaben deeplearningbasedvelocityantialiasingof4dflowmri
AT scottmichaelb deeplearningbasedvelocityantialiasingof4dflowmri
AT barkeralexj deeplearningbasedvelocityantialiasingof4dflowmri
AT mccarthypatrick deeplearningbasedvelocityantialiasingof4dflowmri
AT averyryan deeplearningbasedvelocityantialiasingof4dflowmri
AT allenbrad deeplearningbasedvelocityantialiasingof4dflowmri
AT malaisriechris deeplearningbasedvelocityantialiasingof4dflowmri
AT robinsonjoshuad deeplearningbasedvelocityantialiasingof4dflowmri
AT rigsbycynthiak deeplearningbasedvelocityantialiasingof4dflowmri
AT marklmichael deeplearningbasedvelocityantialiasingof4dflowmri