Cargando…
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Five Systemic Treatments for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in China: An Economic Evaluation Based on Network Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) is the main histological subtype of liver cancer and causes a great disease burden in China. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of five first-line systemic treatments newly approved in the Chinese market for the treatmen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9051228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35493395 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.869960 |
_version_ | 1784696510119673856 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Mingye Pan, Xingming Yin, Yue Hu, Hongfei Wei, Jifu Bai, Zhaoshi Tang, Wenxi |
author_facet | Zhao, Mingye Pan, Xingming Yin, Yue Hu, Hongfei Wei, Jifu Bai, Zhaoshi Tang, Wenxi |
author_sort | Zhao, Mingye |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) is the main histological subtype of liver cancer and causes a great disease burden in China. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of five first-line systemic treatments newly approved in the Chinese market for the treatment of uHCC, namely, sorafenib, lenvatinib, donafenib, sintilimab plus bevacizumab (D + A), and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (T + A) from the perspective of China's healthcare system, to provide a basis for decision-making. METHODS: We constructed a network meta-analysis of 4 clinical trials and used fractional polynomial models to indirectly compare the effectiveness of treatments. The partitioned survival model was used for cost-effectiveness analysis. Primary model outcomes included the costs in US dollars and health outcomes in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) under a willingness-to-pay threshold of $33,521 (3 times the per capita gross domestic product in China) per QALY. We performed deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to investigate the robustness. To test the effect of active treatment duration on the conclusions, we performed a scenario analysis. RESULTS: Compared with sorafenib, lenvatinib, donafenib, D + A, and T + A regimens, it yielded an increase of 0.25, 0.30, 0.95, and 1.46 life-years, respectively. Correspondingly, these four therapies yielded an additional 0.16, 0.19, 0.51, and 0.86 QALYs and all four ICERs, $40,667.92/QALY gained, $27,630.63/QALY gained, $51,877.36/QALY gained, and $130,508.44/QALY gained, were higher than $33,521 except for donafenib. T + A was the most effective treatment and donafenib was the most economical option. Sensitivity and scenario analysis results showed that the base-case analysis was highly reliable. CONCLUSION: Although combination therapy could greatly improve patients with uHCC survival benefits, under the current WTP, donafenib is still the most economical option. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9051228 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90512282022-04-30 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Five Systemic Treatments for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in China: An Economic Evaluation Based on Network Meta-Analysis Zhao, Mingye Pan, Xingming Yin, Yue Hu, Hongfei Wei, Jifu Bai, Zhaoshi Tang, Wenxi Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) is the main histological subtype of liver cancer and causes a great disease burden in China. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of five first-line systemic treatments newly approved in the Chinese market for the treatment of uHCC, namely, sorafenib, lenvatinib, donafenib, sintilimab plus bevacizumab (D + A), and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (T + A) from the perspective of China's healthcare system, to provide a basis for decision-making. METHODS: We constructed a network meta-analysis of 4 clinical trials and used fractional polynomial models to indirectly compare the effectiveness of treatments. The partitioned survival model was used for cost-effectiveness analysis. Primary model outcomes included the costs in US dollars and health outcomes in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) under a willingness-to-pay threshold of $33,521 (3 times the per capita gross domestic product in China) per QALY. We performed deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to investigate the robustness. To test the effect of active treatment duration on the conclusions, we performed a scenario analysis. RESULTS: Compared with sorafenib, lenvatinib, donafenib, D + A, and T + A regimens, it yielded an increase of 0.25, 0.30, 0.95, and 1.46 life-years, respectively. Correspondingly, these four therapies yielded an additional 0.16, 0.19, 0.51, and 0.86 QALYs and all four ICERs, $40,667.92/QALY gained, $27,630.63/QALY gained, $51,877.36/QALY gained, and $130,508.44/QALY gained, were higher than $33,521 except for donafenib. T + A was the most effective treatment and donafenib was the most economical option. Sensitivity and scenario analysis results showed that the base-case analysis was highly reliable. CONCLUSION: Although combination therapy could greatly improve patients with uHCC survival benefits, under the current WTP, donafenib is still the most economical option. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9051228/ /pubmed/35493395 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.869960 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhao, Pan, Yin, Hu, Wei, Bai and Tang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Zhao, Mingye Pan, Xingming Yin, Yue Hu, Hongfei Wei, Jifu Bai, Zhaoshi Tang, Wenxi Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Five Systemic Treatments for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in China: An Economic Evaluation Based on Network Meta-Analysis |
title | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Five Systemic Treatments for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in China: An Economic Evaluation Based on Network Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Five Systemic Treatments for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in China: An Economic Evaluation Based on Network Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Five Systemic Treatments for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in China: An Economic Evaluation Based on Network Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Five Systemic Treatments for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in China: An Economic Evaluation Based on Network Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Five Systemic Treatments for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in China: An Economic Evaluation Based on Network Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness analysis of five systemic treatments for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in china: an economic evaluation based on network meta-analysis |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9051228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35493395 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.869960 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaomingye costeffectivenessanalysisoffivesystemictreatmentsforunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomainchinaaneconomicevaluationbasedonnetworkmetaanalysis AT panxingming costeffectivenessanalysisoffivesystemictreatmentsforunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomainchinaaneconomicevaluationbasedonnetworkmetaanalysis AT yinyue costeffectivenessanalysisoffivesystemictreatmentsforunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomainchinaaneconomicevaluationbasedonnetworkmetaanalysis AT huhongfei costeffectivenessanalysisoffivesystemictreatmentsforunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomainchinaaneconomicevaluationbasedonnetworkmetaanalysis AT weijifu costeffectivenessanalysisoffivesystemictreatmentsforunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomainchinaaneconomicevaluationbasedonnetworkmetaanalysis AT baizhaoshi costeffectivenessanalysisoffivesystemictreatmentsforunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomainchinaaneconomicevaluationbasedonnetworkmetaanalysis AT tangwenxi costeffectivenessanalysisoffivesystemictreatmentsforunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomainchinaaneconomicevaluationbasedonnetworkmetaanalysis |