Cargando…

Uroflowmetric analysis and derivation of nomograms for normal paediatric Indian population between 5 to 15 years of age

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to established normal uroflowmetric values and subsequently derived nomograms of maximum flow rate (Q(max)) and average flow rate (Q(avg)) against voided volume (VV) in children aged 5–15 years at our institute. METHODS: A total of 440 children underwent uroflowmetric evaluation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahajan, Abhay D., Singh, Lakshman P., Darakh, Prashant P., Bathe, Sandeep T., Patil, Martand G., Sharma, Arpit R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Second Military Medical University 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9051350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35509485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2021.08.001
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: We aimed to established normal uroflowmetric values and subsequently derived nomograms of maximum flow rate (Q(max)) and average flow rate (Q(avg)) against voided volume (VV) in children aged 5–15 years at our institute. METHODS: A total of 440 children underwent uroflowmetric evaluation with no history of urological, renal, psychiatric, or neurological disorder between 5 and 15 years of age. Each subject data regarding Q(max), Q(avg), VV, time to Q(max), and flow time, as well as age, sex, height, and weight were recorded. Of the 440 children, around 300 (68.18%) children could produce a normal flow rate at VV of more than 50 mL. Of the remaining 140 (31.82%) children, 50.00% voided less than 50 mL, and remaining 50.00% had abnormal voiding pattern, staccato or interrupted (21.43% each) and plateau or tower shaped (3.57% each). Cases were divided into two age groups (5–9 years and 10–15 years), and uroflowmetric analysis was done between boys and girls in both age groups to derive nomograms of Q(avg) and Q(max). RESULTS: Q(max) and Q(avg) flow nomograms were plotted for boys and girls. Mean Q(max) for boys was 16.68 mL/s and for girls 20.69 mL/s. The mean Q(avg) values were 11.04 mL/s and 8.60 mL/s for girls and boys, respectively. The Q(max) and Q(avg) values were higher in girls. There were significant increases in flow rates with increasing age, body surface area, and VV in both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: Nomograms for Q(max) and Q(avg) may be a useful tool in evaluation of lower urinary tract disturbances in children.