Cargando…
Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection versus open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: A comparison of clinical and perioperative outcomes
OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to evaluate the clinical and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (L-RPLND) and open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (O-RPLND) performed by one surgeon at a single center. METHODS: We evaluated 30 patients with stage I...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Second Military Medical University
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9051357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35509484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2021.05.004 |
_version_ | 1784696536376016896 |
---|---|
author | Shishido, Toshihide Okegawa, Takatsugu Hayashi, Kenjiro Masuda, Kazuki Taguchi, Satoru Nakamura, Yu Tambo, Mitsuhiro Fukuhara, Hiroshi |
author_facet | Shishido, Toshihide Okegawa, Takatsugu Hayashi, Kenjiro Masuda, Kazuki Taguchi, Satoru Nakamura, Yu Tambo, Mitsuhiro Fukuhara, Hiroshi |
author_sort | Shishido, Toshihide |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to evaluate the clinical and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (L-RPLND) and open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (O-RPLND) performed by one surgeon at a single center. METHODS: We evaluated 30 patients with stage IIA germ cell tumors who underwent retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (15 underwent L-RPLND and 15 underwent O-RPLND) at our institution between April 1, 2010 and March 31, 2018. The clinical parameters were compared between patients who underwent L-RPLND using the retroperitoneal approach and those who underwent O-RPLND using the transperitoneal approach. There were no significant differences in the background characteristics of the two groups except for the median follow-up duration (46 months for L-RPLND and 71 months for O-RPLND, p=0.02). RESULTS: L-RPLND was associated with a shorter mean operative time (mean 222 min for L-RPLND vs. 453 min for O-RPLND, p<0.001). There was significantly less blood loss during surgery in the L-RPLND group compared to the O-RPLND group (mean 165 mL for L-RPLND vs. 403 mL for O-RPLND, p<0.001). Parameters related to postoperative recovery were significantly better for the L-RPLND group than for the O-RPLND group. There were no differences in the histopathological characteristics between the two groups. No patients in either group exhibited disease recurrence. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent L-RPLND had more rapid recovery, and shorter hospital stay compared to those who underwent O-RPLND; complications were comparable between the two groups. L-RPLND is an efficient procedure with the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9051357 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Second Military Medical University |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90513572022-05-03 Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection versus open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: A comparison of clinical and perioperative outcomes Shishido, Toshihide Okegawa, Takatsugu Hayashi, Kenjiro Masuda, Kazuki Taguchi, Satoru Nakamura, Yu Tambo, Mitsuhiro Fukuhara, Hiroshi Asian J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to evaluate the clinical and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (L-RPLND) and open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (O-RPLND) performed by one surgeon at a single center. METHODS: We evaluated 30 patients with stage IIA germ cell tumors who underwent retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (15 underwent L-RPLND and 15 underwent O-RPLND) at our institution between April 1, 2010 and March 31, 2018. The clinical parameters were compared between patients who underwent L-RPLND using the retroperitoneal approach and those who underwent O-RPLND using the transperitoneal approach. There were no significant differences in the background characteristics of the two groups except for the median follow-up duration (46 months for L-RPLND and 71 months for O-RPLND, p=0.02). RESULTS: L-RPLND was associated with a shorter mean operative time (mean 222 min for L-RPLND vs. 453 min for O-RPLND, p<0.001). There was significantly less blood loss during surgery in the L-RPLND group compared to the O-RPLND group (mean 165 mL for L-RPLND vs. 403 mL for O-RPLND, p<0.001). Parameters related to postoperative recovery were significantly better for the L-RPLND group than for the O-RPLND group. There were no differences in the histopathological characteristics between the two groups. No patients in either group exhibited disease recurrence. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent L-RPLND had more rapid recovery, and shorter hospital stay compared to those who underwent O-RPLND; complications were comparable between the two groups. L-RPLND is an efficient procedure with the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. Second Military Medical University 2022-04 2021-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9051357/ /pubmed/35509484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2021.05.004 Text en © 2022 Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Shishido, Toshihide Okegawa, Takatsugu Hayashi, Kenjiro Masuda, Kazuki Taguchi, Satoru Nakamura, Yu Tambo, Mitsuhiro Fukuhara, Hiroshi Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection versus open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: A comparison of clinical and perioperative outcomes |
title | Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection versus open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: A comparison of clinical and perioperative outcomes |
title_full | Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection versus open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: A comparison of clinical and perioperative outcomes |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection versus open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: A comparison of clinical and perioperative outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection versus open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: A comparison of clinical and perioperative outcomes |
title_short | Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection versus open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: A comparison of clinical and perioperative outcomes |
title_sort | laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection versus open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: a comparison of clinical and perioperative outcomes |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9051357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35509484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2021.05.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shishidotoshihide laparoscopicretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionversusopenretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionfortesticularcanceracomparisonofclinicalandperioperativeoutcomes AT okegawatakatsugu laparoscopicretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionversusopenretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionfortesticularcanceracomparisonofclinicalandperioperativeoutcomes AT hayashikenjiro laparoscopicretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionversusopenretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionfortesticularcanceracomparisonofclinicalandperioperativeoutcomes AT masudakazuki laparoscopicretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionversusopenretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionfortesticularcanceracomparisonofclinicalandperioperativeoutcomes AT taguchisatoru laparoscopicretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionversusopenretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionfortesticularcanceracomparisonofclinicalandperioperativeoutcomes AT nakamurayu laparoscopicretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionversusopenretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionfortesticularcanceracomparisonofclinicalandperioperativeoutcomes AT tambomitsuhiro laparoscopicretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionversusopenretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionfortesticularcanceracomparisonofclinicalandperioperativeoutcomes AT fukuharahiroshi laparoscopicretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionversusopenretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionfortesticularcanceracomparisonofclinicalandperioperativeoutcomes |