Cargando…

(18)F-FLT PET/CT as a Prognostic Imaging Biomarker of Disease-Specific Survival in Patients with Primary Soft-Tissue Sarcoma

The purpose of this study was to evaluate (18)F-FLT PET/CT as an early prognostic imaging biomarker of long-term overall survival and disease-specific survival (DSS) in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and surgical resection. Methods: This was a 10-y follow-u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crompton, Joseph G., Armstrong, Wesley R., Eckardt, Mark A., Seyedroudbari, Ameen, Tap, William D., Dry, Sarah M., Abt, Evan R., Calais, Jeremie, Herrmann, Ken, Czernin, Johannes, Eilber, Fritz C., Benz, Matthias R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Nuclear Medicine 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9051595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34593596
http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262502
Descripción
Sumario:The purpose of this study was to evaluate (18)F-FLT PET/CT as an early prognostic imaging biomarker of long-term overall survival and disease-specific survival (DSS) in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and surgical resection. Methods: This was a 10-y follow-up of a previous single-center, single-arm prospective clinical trial. Patients underwent (18)F-FLT PET/CT before treatment (PET1) and after NAT (PET2). Posttreatment pathology specimens were assessed for tumor necrosis or fibrosis and for Ki-67 and thymidine kinase 1 expression. Maximally selected cutoffs for PET and histopathologic factors were applied. Survival was calculated from the date of subject consent to the date of death or last follow-up. Results: The study population consisted of 26 patients who underwent PET1; 16 of the 26 with primary STS underwent PET2. Thirteen deaths occurred during a median follow-up of 104 mo. In the overall cohort, overall survival was longer in patients with a low than a high PET1 tumor SUV(max) (dichotomized by an SUV(max) of ≥8.5 vs. <8.5: not yet reached vs. 49.7 mo; P = 0.0064). DSS showed a trend toward significance (P = 0.096). In a subanalysis of primary STS, DSS was significantly longer in patients with a low PET1 tumor SUV(max) (dichotomized by an SUV(max) of ≥8 vs. <8; P = 0.034). There were no significant (18)F-FLT PET response thresholds corresponding to DSS or overall survival after NAT at PET2. Conclusion: (18)F-FLT PET may serve as a prognostic baseline imaging biomarker for DSS in patients with primary STS.