Cargando…

Silent upsurge of gestational diabetes: Are we aware? A rural tertiary care experience of Central Gujarat

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus has been on the rise. With the dramatic increase in the prevalence of overweight, obesity, and inactivity amongst the population, it’s becoming a common problem affecting antenatal women and their offspring. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A prospect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Charmi S., Vaishnav, Smruti B., Mankad, Saptak P., Sharma, Tanishq S., Sapre, Shilpa A., Raithatha, Nitin S., Patel, Mamta R., Mannari, Jyoti G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9051691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35495827
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1059_21
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus has been on the rise. With the dramatic increase in the prevalence of overweight, obesity, and inactivity amongst the population, it’s becoming a common problem affecting antenatal women and their offspring. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study was carried out involving antenatal women between 24-28 weeks of gestation at a tertiary care centre in a rural part of Gujarat. Patients were screened using the Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group India (DIPSI) guidelines. Analysis was carried out using Chi-square and ANOVA test. RESULTS: Patients having PG2BS ≥140 mg/dl were diagnosed as having Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), while those having PG2BS values between 120–139 mg/dl were diagnosed as having Gestational Glucose Intolerance (GGI). Out of the 300 patients screened, we found an overall prevalence of 52 (17.33%) having GDM and 65 (21.67%) having GGI. Most patients belonged to the age bracket of 21-30 years across all groups. The prevalence of GDM in rural antenatal women was 23 (44.2%) and in semi-urban antenatal women was 25 (48.1%) while GGI in the rural antenatal women was 45 (69.2%) followed by semi-urban antenatal women 19 (29.2). We found that Occupation, Residence, Lifestyle, Socio-Economic Class, Family history of Diabetes Mellitus, Body Mass Index (BMI) were all statistically significant whereas Antenatal Complications and Perinatal outcomes weren’t. CONCLUSION: With such a high prevalence of GGI, almost equivalent to GDM, it is important to identify patients having GGI and monitor them to prevent progression to GDM by starting an appropriate treatment modality.