Cargando…

Economic analysis of ASHA-soft programme (online payment and monitoring system) in Jodhpur, Rajasthan

CONTEXT: The Government of India under a performance-based payment scheme is providing remuneration as per the activities completed by the Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHA) health workers. Each state in India has a differentperformance-based payment system for ASHAs. The state of Rajasthan d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joshi, Nitin K., Bhardwaj, Pankaj, Suthar, Praveen, Singh, Kuldeep, Joshi, Vibha, Manda, Balwant
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9051701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35495851
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1266_21
Descripción
Sumario:CONTEXT: The Government of India under a performance-based payment scheme is providing remuneration as per the activities completed by the Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHA) health workers. Each state in India has a differentperformance-based payment system for ASHAs. The state of Rajasthan developed the ASHA-Soft system in 2014 for providing incentives to ASHAs. AIMS: This study is planned to analyze the performance of ASHA-Soft considering the economic aspects as there is a paucity of studies in this context. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This study was conducted in Jodhpur, Rajasthan. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Economic analysis of ASHA-Soft program was performed based on Incentive paid to ASHA workers; Number of beneficiaries; Overall contribution of ASHAs in the health services; and unit cost per health service under ASHA-Soft program. Data of five financial years, that is, from the inception of ASHA-Soft was analyzed. RESULTS: Consolidated incentive for maternal health, child health, and Immunization services provided to ASHAs through ASHA-Soft in the year 2015--16 was $96794.22, $35348.32, and $49016.83 which increased to $200285.00, $116320.52, and $101686.48 in the year 2019—20, respectively. Family planning and national program services were provided to 6,259 and 4,061 beneficiaries, respectively, in the year 2015--16 which markedly increased to 16,360 and 9,552 in the year 2019--20. Unit-cost of service provided by ASHAs in the National Programme ($1.13) was the lowest and for Family Planning Services ($5.71) were the highest. CONCLUSIONS: ASHA-Soft program seems a potential program to attract ASHA workers for delivering health care services. The findings of this study could assist policymakers in guiding further decision-making.