Cargando…

Hydroxychloroquine pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 among healthcare workers: Initial experience from India

BACKGROUND: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) had generated considerable interest for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prophylaxis. We conducted a prospective observational study at a tertiary care hospital in India, with dedicated COVID-19 care facilities. OBJECTIVES: Primary objective was incidence of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kadnur, Harshith B., Aggarwal, Anivita, Soneja, Manish, Singh, Komal, Mittal, Ankit, Nischal, Neeraj, Tirlangi, Praveen, Khan, Adil Rashid, Desai, Devashish, Gupta, Ankesh, Kumar, Arvind, Jorwal, Pankaj, Biswas, Ashutosh, Pandey, Ravindra Mohan, Wig, Naveet, Guleria, Randeep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9051734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35495846
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1177_21
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) had generated considerable interest for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prophylaxis. We conducted a prospective observational study at a tertiary care hospital in India, with dedicated COVID-19 care facilities. OBJECTIVES: Primary objective was incidence of adverse effects, secondary objective being efficacy in preventing COVID-19. METHODS: Healthcare workers were recruited and grouped based on voluntary HCQ prophylaxis as per national guidelines. Side effects in HCQ group were graded in accordance with national cancer institute-common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI-CTCAE) version 5.0. At 3–7-week follow-up, groups were compared for COVID-19 exposure, symptoms development and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RT-PCR results. RESULTS: Among 358 participants recruited, 216 (60.3%) were males and mean age was 31.2 ± 6.6 years. Chemoprophylaxis was initiated by 258 (72%) participants. After loading dose, 7 (2.7%) reported grade 2 and 1 (0.4%) grade 3 adverse effects. Discontinuation of HCQ due to side effects was reported in 11 (4.3%) participants. Electrocardiogram was done by 50 (19.4%) participants on HCQ; no abnormalities were noted. A total of 106 (41%) among those taking and 63 (63%) among those not taking HCQ were tested for SARS-CoV-2 due to influenza-like illness or significant exposure. Among all participants, 25 (6.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.3–9.6) developed COVID-19 during the study period. In the group taking HCQ, 10 (3.9%) tested positive compared to 15 (15%) in the group not taking HCQ (P < 0.001). Odds ratio with HCQ intake was 0.34 (95% CI 0.13–0.83, P = 0.01) and the number needed to treat was 12. CONCLUSION: HCQ is safe at the recommended dose for pre-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19.