Cargando…

Casting Without Reduction Versus Closed Reduction With or Without Fixation in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Children: Protocol for a Randomized Noninferiority Trial

BACKGROUND: Acute treatment for distal radius fractures, the most frequent fractures in the pediatric population, represents a challenge to the orthopedic surgeon. Deciding on surgical restoration of the alignment or cast immobilization without reducing the fracture is a complex concern given the re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garcia-Rueda, Maria Fernanda, Bohorquez-Penaranda, Adriana Patricia, Gil-Laverde, Jacky Fabian Armando, Aguilar-Sierra, Francisco Javier, Mendoza-Pulido, Camilo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9052017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35436224
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34576
_version_ 1784696693725331456
author Garcia-Rueda, Maria Fernanda
Bohorquez-Penaranda, Adriana Patricia
Gil-Laverde, Jacky Fabian Armando
Aguilar-Sierra, Francisco Javier
Mendoza-Pulido, Camilo
author_facet Garcia-Rueda, Maria Fernanda
Bohorquez-Penaranda, Adriana Patricia
Gil-Laverde, Jacky Fabian Armando
Aguilar-Sierra, Francisco Javier
Mendoza-Pulido, Camilo
author_sort Garcia-Rueda, Maria Fernanda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acute treatment for distal radius fractures, the most frequent fractures in the pediatric population, represents a challenge to the orthopedic surgeon. Deciding on surgical restoration of the alignment or cast immobilization without reducing the fracture is a complex concern given the remodeling potential of bones in children. In addition, the lack of evidence-based safe boundaries of shortening and angulation, that will not jeopardize upper-extremity functionality in the future, further complicates this decision. OBJECTIVE: The authors aim to measure functional outcomes, assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Physical Function v2.0 instrument. The authors hypothesize that outcomes will not be worse in children treated with cast immobilization in situ compared with those treated with closed reduction with or without percutaneous fixation. The authors also aim to compare the following as secondary outcomes: ulnar variance and fracture alignment in the sagittal and coronal planes, range of motion, pressure ulcers, pain control, radius osteotomy due to deformity, pseudoarthrosis cure, and remanipulation. METHODS: This is the protocol of a randomized noninferiority trial comparing upper-extremity functionality in children aged 5 to 10 years, after sustaining a distal radius fracture, treated with either cast immobilization in situ or closed reduction with or without fixation in a single orthopedic hospital. Functional follow-up is projected at 6 months, while clinical and radiographic follow-up will occur at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 9 months. RESULTS: Recruitment commenced in July 2021. As of January 2022, 23 children have been randomized. Authors expect an average of 5 patients to be recruited monthly; therefore, recruitment and analysis should be complete by October 2024. CONCLUSIONS: This experimental design that addresses upper-extremity functionality after cast immobilization in situ in children who have sustained a distal fracture of the radius may yield compelling information that could aid the clinician in deciding on the most suitable orthopedic treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05008029; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05008029 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/34576
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9052017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90520172022-04-30 Casting Without Reduction Versus Closed Reduction With or Without Fixation in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Children: Protocol for a Randomized Noninferiority Trial Garcia-Rueda, Maria Fernanda Bohorquez-Penaranda, Adriana Patricia Gil-Laverde, Jacky Fabian Armando Aguilar-Sierra, Francisco Javier Mendoza-Pulido, Camilo JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: Acute treatment for distal radius fractures, the most frequent fractures in the pediatric population, represents a challenge to the orthopedic surgeon. Deciding on surgical restoration of the alignment or cast immobilization without reducing the fracture is a complex concern given the remodeling potential of bones in children. In addition, the lack of evidence-based safe boundaries of shortening and angulation, that will not jeopardize upper-extremity functionality in the future, further complicates this decision. OBJECTIVE: The authors aim to measure functional outcomes, assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Physical Function v2.0 instrument. The authors hypothesize that outcomes will not be worse in children treated with cast immobilization in situ compared with those treated with closed reduction with or without percutaneous fixation. The authors also aim to compare the following as secondary outcomes: ulnar variance and fracture alignment in the sagittal and coronal planes, range of motion, pressure ulcers, pain control, radius osteotomy due to deformity, pseudoarthrosis cure, and remanipulation. METHODS: This is the protocol of a randomized noninferiority trial comparing upper-extremity functionality in children aged 5 to 10 years, after sustaining a distal radius fracture, treated with either cast immobilization in situ or closed reduction with or without fixation in a single orthopedic hospital. Functional follow-up is projected at 6 months, while clinical and radiographic follow-up will occur at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 9 months. RESULTS: Recruitment commenced in July 2021. As of January 2022, 23 children have been randomized. Authors expect an average of 5 patients to be recruited monthly; therefore, recruitment and analysis should be complete by October 2024. CONCLUSIONS: This experimental design that addresses upper-extremity functionality after cast immobilization in situ in children who have sustained a distal fracture of the radius may yield compelling information that could aid the clinician in deciding on the most suitable orthopedic treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05008029; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05008029 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/34576 JMIR Publications 2022-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9052017/ /pubmed/35436224 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34576 Text en ©Maria Fernanda Garcia-Rueda, Adriana Patricia Bohorquez-Penaranda, Jacky Fabian Armando Gil-Laverde, Francisco Javier Aguilar-Sierra, Camilo Mendoza-Pulido. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 14.04.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Garcia-Rueda, Maria Fernanda
Bohorquez-Penaranda, Adriana Patricia
Gil-Laverde, Jacky Fabian Armando
Aguilar-Sierra, Francisco Javier
Mendoza-Pulido, Camilo
Casting Without Reduction Versus Closed Reduction With or Without Fixation in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Children: Protocol for a Randomized Noninferiority Trial
title Casting Without Reduction Versus Closed Reduction With or Without Fixation in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Children: Protocol for a Randomized Noninferiority Trial
title_full Casting Without Reduction Versus Closed Reduction With or Without Fixation in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Children: Protocol for a Randomized Noninferiority Trial
title_fullStr Casting Without Reduction Versus Closed Reduction With or Without Fixation in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Children: Protocol for a Randomized Noninferiority Trial
title_full_unstemmed Casting Without Reduction Versus Closed Reduction With or Without Fixation in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Children: Protocol for a Randomized Noninferiority Trial
title_short Casting Without Reduction Versus Closed Reduction With or Without Fixation in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Children: Protocol for a Randomized Noninferiority Trial
title_sort casting without reduction versus closed reduction with or without fixation in the treatment of distal radius fractures in children: protocol for a randomized noninferiority trial
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9052017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35436224
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34576
work_keys_str_mv AT garciaruedamariafernanda castingwithoutreductionversusclosedreductionwithorwithoutfixationinthetreatmentofdistalradiusfracturesinchildrenprotocolforarandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT bohorquezpenarandaadrianapatricia castingwithoutreductionversusclosedreductionwithorwithoutfixationinthetreatmentofdistalradiusfracturesinchildrenprotocolforarandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT gillaverdejackyfabianarmando castingwithoutreductionversusclosedreductionwithorwithoutfixationinthetreatmentofdistalradiusfracturesinchildrenprotocolforarandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT aguilarsierrafranciscojavier castingwithoutreductionversusclosedreductionwithorwithoutfixationinthetreatmentofdistalradiusfracturesinchildrenprotocolforarandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT mendozapulidocamilo castingwithoutreductionversusclosedreductionwithorwithoutfixationinthetreatmentofdistalradiusfracturesinchildrenprotocolforarandomizednoninferioritytrial