Cargando…
The Chinese version of the revised Diabetes Distress Scale for adults with type 2 diabetes: Translation and validation study
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to translate the revised 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS17, 2017) into mandarin (simplified) Chinese and validate the Chinese version of DDS17 (C-DDS17, 2021) among adult patients with type 2 diabetes in China. METHODS: A scale translation and cross-sectional valida...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Chinese Nursing Association
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9052264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35509697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.03.002 |
_version_ | 1784696748232409088 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yu-Yun Li, Wei Sheng, Yu |
author_facet | Zhang, Yu-Yun Li, Wei Sheng, Yu |
author_sort | Zhang, Yu-Yun |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to translate the revised 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS17, 2017) into mandarin (simplified) Chinese and validate the Chinese version of DDS17 (C-DDS17, 2021) among adult patients with type 2 diabetes in China. METHODS: A scale translation and cross-sectional validation study was conducted. The DDS17 was translated into mandarin (simplified) Chinese through a five-step process: authorization, forward translation, synthesis, back translation, and amendment. During this session, 59 patients assessed the understandability and readability of the translated scale. From June 7 to September 4, 2021, a cross-sectional study that adhered to the COSMIN checklist was conducted with 400 individuals with type 2 diabetes from three Class A tertiary comprehensive hospitals in Beijing, China. The content, construct, convergent, discriminant validity, and reliability (Cronbach’s α coefficient and item-total correlation coefficients) of the C-DDS17 were evaluated. This study was a part of a project registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (no. ChiCTR2100047071). RESULTS: Among the participants, 33.3% (133/400) of them experienced moderate to high diabetes distress. The content validity indices of the C-DDS17 equaled 1.00. The scale yielded a four-factor structure. The average variances extracted were 0.42–0.57, which was lower than squared correlations. Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.88 for the overall scale and ranged from 0.76 to 0.81 for sub-scales. Corrected item-total correlation coefficients ranged from 0.42 to 0.61. The eighth item (“Feeling that I am often failing with my diabetes routine”) was better fit to physician distress than regimen distress but had little influence on the validation results. CONCLUSIONS: The C-DDS17 is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing diabetes distress in patients with type 2 diabetes. It is a promising instrument for early identification and management of diabetes distress in clinical practice and trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9052264 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Chinese Nursing Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90522642022-05-03 The Chinese version of the revised Diabetes Distress Scale for adults with type 2 diabetes: Translation and validation study Zhang, Yu-Yun Li, Wei Sheng, Yu Int J Nurs Sci Research Paper OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to translate the revised 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS17, 2017) into mandarin (simplified) Chinese and validate the Chinese version of DDS17 (C-DDS17, 2021) among adult patients with type 2 diabetes in China. METHODS: A scale translation and cross-sectional validation study was conducted. The DDS17 was translated into mandarin (simplified) Chinese through a five-step process: authorization, forward translation, synthesis, back translation, and amendment. During this session, 59 patients assessed the understandability and readability of the translated scale. From June 7 to September 4, 2021, a cross-sectional study that adhered to the COSMIN checklist was conducted with 400 individuals with type 2 diabetes from three Class A tertiary comprehensive hospitals in Beijing, China. The content, construct, convergent, discriminant validity, and reliability (Cronbach’s α coefficient and item-total correlation coefficients) of the C-DDS17 were evaluated. This study was a part of a project registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (no. ChiCTR2100047071). RESULTS: Among the participants, 33.3% (133/400) of them experienced moderate to high diabetes distress. The content validity indices of the C-DDS17 equaled 1.00. The scale yielded a four-factor structure. The average variances extracted were 0.42–0.57, which was lower than squared correlations. Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.88 for the overall scale and ranged from 0.76 to 0.81 for sub-scales. Corrected item-total correlation coefficients ranged from 0.42 to 0.61. The eighth item (“Feeling that I am often failing with my diabetes routine”) was better fit to physician distress than regimen distress but had little influence on the validation results. CONCLUSIONS: The C-DDS17 is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing diabetes distress in patients with type 2 diabetes. It is a promising instrument for early identification and management of diabetes distress in clinical practice and trials. Chinese Nursing Association 2022-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9052264/ /pubmed/35509697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.03.002 Text en © 2022 The authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Zhang, Yu-Yun Li, Wei Sheng, Yu The Chinese version of the revised Diabetes Distress Scale for adults with type 2 diabetes: Translation and validation study |
title | The Chinese version of the revised Diabetes Distress Scale for adults with type 2 diabetes: Translation and validation study |
title_full | The Chinese version of the revised Diabetes Distress Scale for adults with type 2 diabetes: Translation and validation study |
title_fullStr | The Chinese version of the revised Diabetes Distress Scale for adults with type 2 diabetes: Translation and validation study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Chinese version of the revised Diabetes Distress Scale for adults with type 2 diabetes: Translation and validation study |
title_short | The Chinese version of the revised Diabetes Distress Scale for adults with type 2 diabetes: Translation and validation study |
title_sort | chinese version of the revised diabetes distress scale for adults with type 2 diabetes: translation and validation study |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9052264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35509697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.03.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyuyun thechineseversionofthereviseddiabetesdistressscaleforadultswithtype2diabetestranslationandvalidationstudy AT liwei thechineseversionofthereviseddiabetesdistressscaleforadultswithtype2diabetestranslationandvalidationstudy AT shengyu thechineseversionofthereviseddiabetesdistressscaleforadultswithtype2diabetestranslationandvalidationstudy AT zhangyuyun chineseversionofthereviseddiabetesdistressscaleforadultswithtype2diabetestranslationandvalidationstudy AT liwei chineseversionofthereviseddiabetesdistressscaleforadultswithtype2diabetestranslationandvalidationstudy AT shengyu chineseversionofthereviseddiabetesdistressscaleforadultswithtype2diabetestranslationandvalidationstudy |