Cargando…

Validation of the myocardial-ischaemic-injury-index machine learning algorithm to guide the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in a heterogenous population: a prespecified exploratory analysis

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic pathways for myocardial infarction rely on fixed troponin thresholds, which do not recognise that troponin varies by age, sex, and time within individuals. To overcome this limitation, we recently introduced a machine learning algorithm that predicts the likelihood of myocardi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doudesis, Dimitrios, Lee, Kuan Ken, Yang, Jason, Wereski, Ryan, Shah, Anoop S V, Tsanas, Athanasios, Anand, Atul, Pickering, John W, Than, Martin P, Mills, Nicholas L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9052331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35461689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00025-5
_version_ 1784696761121505280
author Doudesis, Dimitrios
Lee, Kuan Ken
Yang, Jason
Wereski, Ryan
Shah, Anoop S V
Tsanas, Athanasios
Anand, Atul
Pickering, John W
Than, Martin P
Mills, Nicholas L
author_facet Doudesis, Dimitrios
Lee, Kuan Ken
Yang, Jason
Wereski, Ryan
Shah, Anoop S V
Tsanas, Athanasios
Anand, Atul
Pickering, John W
Than, Martin P
Mills, Nicholas L
author_sort Doudesis, Dimitrios
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnostic pathways for myocardial infarction rely on fixed troponin thresholds, which do not recognise that troponin varies by age, sex, and time within individuals. To overcome this limitation, we recently introduced a machine learning algorithm that predicts the likelihood of myocardial infarction. Our aim was to evaluate whether this algorithm performs well in routine clinical practice and predicts subsequent events. METHODS: The myocardial-ischaemic-injury-index (MI(3)) algorithm was validated in a prespecified exploratory analysis using data from a multi-centre randomised trial done in Scotland, UK that included consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome undergoing serial high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I measurement. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were excluded. MI(3) incorporates age, sex, and two troponin measurements to compute a value (0–100) reflecting an individual's likelihood of myocardial infarction during the index visit and estimates diagnostic performance metrics (including area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve, and the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value) at the computed score. Model performance for an index diagnosis of myocardial infarction (type 1 or type 4b), and for subsequent myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death at 1 year was determined using the previously defined low-probability threshold (1·6) and high-probability MI(3) threshold (49·7). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01852123. FINDINGS: In total, 20 761 patients (64 years [SD 16], 9597 [46%] women) enrolled between June 10, 2013, and March 3, 2016, were included from the High-STEACS trial cohort, of whom 3272 (15·8%) had myocardial infarction. MI(3) had an area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve of 0·949 (95% CI 0·946–0·952) identifying 12 983 (62·5%) patients as low-probability for myocardial infarction at the pre-specified threshold (MI(3) score <1·6; sensitivity 99·3% [95% CI 99·0–99·6], negative predictive value 99·8% [99·8–99·9]), and 2961 (14·3%) as high-probability at the pre-specified threshold (MI(3) score ≥49·7; specificity 95·0% [94·6–95·3], positive predictive value 70·4% [68·7–72·0]). At 1 year, subsequent myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death occurred more often in high-probability patients than low-probability patients (520 [17·6%] of 2961 vs 197 [1·5%] of 12 983], p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: In consecutive patients undergoing serial cardiac troponin measurement for suspected acute coronary syndrome, the MI(3) algorithm accurately estimated the likelihood of myocardial infarction and predicted subsequent adverse cardiovascular events. By providing individual probabilities the MI(3) algorithm could improve the diagnosis and assessment of risk in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. FUNDING: Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation, National Institute for Health Research, and NHSX.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9052331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90523312022-06-07 Validation of the myocardial-ischaemic-injury-index machine learning algorithm to guide the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in a heterogenous population: a prespecified exploratory analysis Doudesis, Dimitrios Lee, Kuan Ken Yang, Jason Wereski, Ryan Shah, Anoop S V Tsanas, Athanasios Anand, Atul Pickering, John W Than, Martin P Mills, Nicholas L Lancet Digit Health Articles BACKGROUND: Diagnostic pathways for myocardial infarction rely on fixed troponin thresholds, which do not recognise that troponin varies by age, sex, and time within individuals. To overcome this limitation, we recently introduced a machine learning algorithm that predicts the likelihood of myocardial infarction. Our aim was to evaluate whether this algorithm performs well in routine clinical practice and predicts subsequent events. METHODS: The myocardial-ischaemic-injury-index (MI(3)) algorithm was validated in a prespecified exploratory analysis using data from a multi-centre randomised trial done in Scotland, UK that included consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome undergoing serial high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I measurement. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were excluded. MI(3) incorporates age, sex, and two troponin measurements to compute a value (0–100) reflecting an individual's likelihood of myocardial infarction during the index visit and estimates diagnostic performance metrics (including area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve, and the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value) at the computed score. Model performance for an index diagnosis of myocardial infarction (type 1 or type 4b), and for subsequent myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death at 1 year was determined using the previously defined low-probability threshold (1·6) and high-probability MI(3) threshold (49·7). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01852123. FINDINGS: In total, 20 761 patients (64 years [SD 16], 9597 [46%] women) enrolled between June 10, 2013, and March 3, 2016, were included from the High-STEACS trial cohort, of whom 3272 (15·8%) had myocardial infarction. MI(3) had an area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve of 0·949 (95% CI 0·946–0·952) identifying 12 983 (62·5%) patients as low-probability for myocardial infarction at the pre-specified threshold (MI(3) score <1·6; sensitivity 99·3% [95% CI 99·0–99·6], negative predictive value 99·8% [99·8–99·9]), and 2961 (14·3%) as high-probability at the pre-specified threshold (MI(3) score ≥49·7; specificity 95·0% [94·6–95·3], positive predictive value 70·4% [68·7–72·0]). At 1 year, subsequent myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death occurred more often in high-probability patients than low-probability patients (520 [17·6%] of 2961 vs 197 [1·5%] of 12 983], p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: In consecutive patients undergoing serial cardiac troponin measurement for suspected acute coronary syndrome, the MI(3) algorithm accurately estimated the likelihood of myocardial infarction and predicted subsequent adverse cardiovascular events. By providing individual probabilities the MI(3) algorithm could improve the diagnosis and assessment of risk in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. FUNDING: Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation, National Institute for Health Research, and NHSX. Elsevier Ltd 2022-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9052331/ /pubmed/35461689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00025-5 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Doudesis, Dimitrios
Lee, Kuan Ken
Yang, Jason
Wereski, Ryan
Shah, Anoop S V
Tsanas, Athanasios
Anand, Atul
Pickering, John W
Than, Martin P
Mills, Nicholas L
Validation of the myocardial-ischaemic-injury-index machine learning algorithm to guide the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in a heterogenous population: a prespecified exploratory analysis
title Validation of the myocardial-ischaemic-injury-index machine learning algorithm to guide the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in a heterogenous population: a prespecified exploratory analysis
title_full Validation of the myocardial-ischaemic-injury-index machine learning algorithm to guide the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in a heterogenous population: a prespecified exploratory analysis
title_fullStr Validation of the myocardial-ischaemic-injury-index machine learning algorithm to guide the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in a heterogenous population: a prespecified exploratory analysis
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the myocardial-ischaemic-injury-index machine learning algorithm to guide the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in a heterogenous population: a prespecified exploratory analysis
title_short Validation of the myocardial-ischaemic-injury-index machine learning algorithm to guide the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in a heterogenous population: a prespecified exploratory analysis
title_sort validation of the myocardial-ischaemic-injury-index machine learning algorithm to guide the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in a heterogenous population: a prespecified exploratory analysis
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9052331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35461689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00025-5
work_keys_str_mv AT doudesisdimitrios validationofthemyocardialischaemicinjuryindexmachinelearningalgorithmtoguidethediagnosisofmyocardialinfarctioninaheterogenouspopulationaprespecifiedexploratoryanalysis
AT leekuanken validationofthemyocardialischaemicinjuryindexmachinelearningalgorithmtoguidethediagnosisofmyocardialinfarctioninaheterogenouspopulationaprespecifiedexploratoryanalysis
AT yangjason validationofthemyocardialischaemicinjuryindexmachinelearningalgorithmtoguidethediagnosisofmyocardialinfarctioninaheterogenouspopulationaprespecifiedexploratoryanalysis
AT wereskiryan validationofthemyocardialischaemicinjuryindexmachinelearningalgorithmtoguidethediagnosisofmyocardialinfarctioninaheterogenouspopulationaprespecifiedexploratoryanalysis
AT shahanoopsv validationofthemyocardialischaemicinjuryindexmachinelearningalgorithmtoguidethediagnosisofmyocardialinfarctioninaheterogenouspopulationaprespecifiedexploratoryanalysis
AT tsanasathanasios validationofthemyocardialischaemicinjuryindexmachinelearningalgorithmtoguidethediagnosisofmyocardialinfarctioninaheterogenouspopulationaprespecifiedexploratoryanalysis
AT anandatul validationofthemyocardialischaemicinjuryindexmachinelearningalgorithmtoguidethediagnosisofmyocardialinfarctioninaheterogenouspopulationaprespecifiedexploratoryanalysis
AT pickeringjohnw validationofthemyocardialischaemicinjuryindexmachinelearningalgorithmtoguidethediagnosisofmyocardialinfarctioninaheterogenouspopulationaprespecifiedexploratoryanalysis
AT thanmartinp validationofthemyocardialischaemicinjuryindexmachinelearningalgorithmtoguidethediagnosisofmyocardialinfarctioninaheterogenouspopulationaprespecifiedexploratoryanalysis
AT millsnicholasl validationofthemyocardialischaemicinjuryindexmachinelearningalgorithmtoguidethediagnosisofmyocardialinfarctioninaheterogenouspopulationaprespecifiedexploratoryanalysis
AT validationofthemyocardialischaemicinjuryindexmachinelearningalgorithmtoguidethediagnosisofmyocardialinfarctioninaheterogenouspopulationaprespecifiedexploratoryanalysis