Cargando…

Small airway dysfunction in pneumoconiosis: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Although several histological studies have documented airway inflammation and remodelling in the small airways of dust-exposed workers, little is known regarding the prevalence and risk factors of small airway dysfunction (SAD) in pneumoconiosis. The present study investigated the preval...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Yali, Ma, Ruimin, Du, Xuqin, Chai, Dandan, Yang, Shuangli, Ye, Qiao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9052448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35484546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-01929-9
_version_ 1784696785340465152
author Fan, Yali
Ma, Ruimin
Du, Xuqin
Chai, Dandan
Yang, Shuangli
Ye, Qiao
author_facet Fan, Yali
Ma, Ruimin
Du, Xuqin
Chai, Dandan
Yang, Shuangli
Ye, Qiao
author_sort Fan, Yali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although several histological studies have documented airway inflammation and remodelling in the small airways of dust-exposed workers, little is known regarding the prevalence and risk factors of small airway dysfunction (SAD) in pneumoconiosis. The present study investigated the prevalence and characteristics of spirometry-defined SAD in pneumoconiosis and assessed the risk factors for associated with SAD. METHODS: A total of 1255 patients with pneumoconiosis were invited to participate, of whom 1115 patients were eligible for final analysis. Spirometry was performed to assess SAD using the following three indicators: maximal mid-expiratory flow and forced expiratory flow 50% and 75%. SAD was defined as at least two of these three indicators being less than 65% of predicted value. Logistic regression analyses were used to analyse the relationships between clinical variables and SAD. RESULTS: Overall, 66.3% of patients with pneumoconiosis had SAD, among never-smokers the prevalence of SAD was 66.7%. The proportion of SAD did not differ among the subtypes of pneumoconiosis. In addition, SAD was present across the patients with all stages of pneumoconiosis. Even among those with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) ≥ 80% and FEV(1)/forced vital capacity ratio ≥ 70%, 40.8% of patients had SAD. Patients with SAD were older than patients without SAD, more likely to be women and heavy smokers. Importantly, patients with SAD had more severe airflow obstruction, air trapping, and diffusion dysfunction. All patients with both pneumoconiosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease had SAD. Based on multivariate analysis, overall, aged 40 years and older, female sex, heavy smoking, body mass index ≥ 25.0 kg/m(2) and pneumoconiosis stage III were significantly associated with increased risk of SAD. Among the never smokers, risk factors for SAD included female sex, BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m(2), pneumoconiosis stage II and stage III CONCLUSION: Spirometry-defined SAD is one of the common functional abnormalities caused by occupational dust exposure and should be taken into account when monitoring respiratory health of workers to guide the early precautions and management in pneumoconiosis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-022-01929-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9052448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90524482022-04-30 Small airway dysfunction in pneumoconiosis: a cross-sectional study Fan, Yali Ma, Ruimin Du, Xuqin Chai, Dandan Yang, Shuangli Ye, Qiao BMC Pulm Med Research BACKGROUND: Although several histological studies have documented airway inflammation and remodelling in the small airways of dust-exposed workers, little is known regarding the prevalence and risk factors of small airway dysfunction (SAD) in pneumoconiosis. The present study investigated the prevalence and characteristics of spirometry-defined SAD in pneumoconiosis and assessed the risk factors for associated with SAD. METHODS: A total of 1255 patients with pneumoconiosis were invited to participate, of whom 1115 patients were eligible for final analysis. Spirometry was performed to assess SAD using the following three indicators: maximal mid-expiratory flow and forced expiratory flow 50% and 75%. SAD was defined as at least two of these three indicators being less than 65% of predicted value. Logistic regression analyses were used to analyse the relationships between clinical variables and SAD. RESULTS: Overall, 66.3% of patients with pneumoconiosis had SAD, among never-smokers the prevalence of SAD was 66.7%. The proportion of SAD did not differ among the subtypes of pneumoconiosis. In addition, SAD was present across the patients with all stages of pneumoconiosis. Even among those with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) ≥ 80% and FEV(1)/forced vital capacity ratio ≥ 70%, 40.8% of patients had SAD. Patients with SAD were older than patients without SAD, more likely to be women and heavy smokers. Importantly, patients with SAD had more severe airflow obstruction, air trapping, and diffusion dysfunction. All patients with both pneumoconiosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease had SAD. Based on multivariate analysis, overall, aged 40 years and older, female sex, heavy smoking, body mass index ≥ 25.0 kg/m(2) and pneumoconiosis stage III were significantly associated with increased risk of SAD. Among the never smokers, risk factors for SAD included female sex, BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m(2), pneumoconiosis stage II and stage III CONCLUSION: Spirometry-defined SAD is one of the common functional abnormalities caused by occupational dust exposure and should be taken into account when monitoring respiratory health of workers to guide the early precautions and management in pneumoconiosis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-022-01929-9. BioMed Central 2022-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9052448/ /pubmed/35484546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-01929-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Fan, Yali
Ma, Ruimin
Du, Xuqin
Chai, Dandan
Yang, Shuangli
Ye, Qiao
Small airway dysfunction in pneumoconiosis: a cross-sectional study
title Small airway dysfunction in pneumoconiosis: a cross-sectional study
title_full Small airway dysfunction in pneumoconiosis: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Small airway dysfunction in pneumoconiosis: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Small airway dysfunction in pneumoconiosis: a cross-sectional study
title_short Small airway dysfunction in pneumoconiosis: a cross-sectional study
title_sort small airway dysfunction in pneumoconiosis: a cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9052448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35484546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-01929-9
work_keys_str_mv AT fanyali smallairwaydysfunctioninpneumoconiosisacrosssectionalstudy
AT maruimin smallairwaydysfunctioninpneumoconiosisacrosssectionalstudy
AT duxuqin smallairwaydysfunctioninpneumoconiosisacrosssectionalstudy
AT chaidandan smallairwaydysfunctioninpneumoconiosisacrosssectionalstudy
AT yangshuangli smallairwaydysfunctioninpneumoconiosisacrosssectionalstudy
AT yeqiao smallairwaydysfunctioninpneumoconiosisacrosssectionalstudy