Cargando…

Safety assessment of a redirection program using an electronic application for low-acuity patients visiting an emergency department

BACKGROUND: Emergency departments (EDs) are operating at or above capacity, which has negative consequences on patients in terms of quality of care and morbi-mortality. Redirection strategies for low-acuity ED patients to primary care practices are usually based on subjective eligibility criteria th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feral-Pierssens, Anne-Laure, Morris, Judy, Marquis, Martin, Daoust, Raoul, Cournoyer, Alexis, Lessard, Justine, Berthelot, Simon, Messier, Alexandre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9052637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35488215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00626-4
_version_ 1784696824544624640
author Feral-Pierssens, Anne-Laure
Morris, Judy
Marquis, Martin
Daoust, Raoul
Cournoyer, Alexis
Lessard, Justine
Berthelot, Simon
Messier, Alexandre
author_facet Feral-Pierssens, Anne-Laure
Morris, Judy
Marquis, Martin
Daoust, Raoul
Cournoyer, Alexis
Lessard, Justine
Berthelot, Simon
Messier, Alexandre
author_sort Feral-Pierssens, Anne-Laure
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Emergency departments (EDs) are operating at or above capacity, which has negative consequences on patients in terms of quality of care and morbi-mortality. Redirection strategies for low-acuity ED patients to primary care practices are usually based on subjective eligibility criteria that sometimes necessitate formal medical assessment. Literature investigating the effect of those interventions is equivocal. The aim of the present study was to assess the safety of a redirection process using an electronic clinical support system used by the triage nurse without physician assessment. METHODS: A single cohort observational study was performed in the ED of a level 1 academic trauma center. All low-acuity patients redirected to nearby clinics through a clinical decision support system (February–August 2017) were included. This system uses different sets of medical prerequisites to identify patients eligible to redirection. Data on safety and patient experience were collected through phone questionnaires on day 2 and 10 after ED visit. The primary endpoint was the rate of redirected patients returning to any ED for an unexpected visit within 48 h. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of 7-day return visit and satisfaction rates. RESULTS: A total of 980 redirected low-acuity patients were included over the period: 18 patients (2.8%) returned unexpectedly to an ED within 48 h and 31 patients (4.8%) within 7 days. No hospital admission or death were reported within 7 days following the first ED visit. Among redirected patients, 81% were satisfied with care provided by the clinic staff. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a specific electronic-guided decision support redirection protocol appeared to provide safe deferral to nearby clinics for redirected low-acuity patients. EDs are pivotal elements of the healthcare system pathway and redirection process could represent an interesting tool to improve the care to low-acuity patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9052637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90526372022-04-30 Safety assessment of a redirection program using an electronic application for low-acuity patients visiting an emergency department Feral-Pierssens, Anne-Laure Morris, Judy Marquis, Martin Daoust, Raoul Cournoyer, Alexis Lessard, Justine Berthelot, Simon Messier, Alexandre BMC Emerg Med Research BACKGROUND: Emergency departments (EDs) are operating at or above capacity, which has negative consequences on patients in terms of quality of care and morbi-mortality. Redirection strategies for low-acuity ED patients to primary care practices are usually based on subjective eligibility criteria that sometimes necessitate formal medical assessment. Literature investigating the effect of those interventions is equivocal. The aim of the present study was to assess the safety of a redirection process using an electronic clinical support system used by the triage nurse without physician assessment. METHODS: A single cohort observational study was performed in the ED of a level 1 academic trauma center. All low-acuity patients redirected to nearby clinics through a clinical decision support system (February–August 2017) were included. This system uses different sets of medical prerequisites to identify patients eligible to redirection. Data on safety and patient experience were collected through phone questionnaires on day 2 and 10 after ED visit. The primary endpoint was the rate of redirected patients returning to any ED for an unexpected visit within 48 h. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of 7-day return visit and satisfaction rates. RESULTS: A total of 980 redirected low-acuity patients were included over the period: 18 patients (2.8%) returned unexpectedly to an ED within 48 h and 31 patients (4.8%) within 7 days. No hospital admission or death were reported within 7 days following the first ED visit. Among redirected patients, 81% were satisfied with care provided by the clinic staff. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a specific electronic-guided decision support redirection protocol appeared to provide safe deferral to nearby clinics for redirected low-acuity patients. EDs are pivotal elements of the healthcare system pathway and redirection process could represent an interesting tool to improve the care to low-acuity patients. BioMed Central 2022-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9052637/ /pubmed/35488215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00626-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Feral-Pierssens, Anne-Laure
Morris, Judy
Marquis, Martin
Daoust, Raoul
Cournoyer, Alexis
Lessard, Justine
Berthelot, Simon
Messier, Alexandre
Safety assessment of a redirection program using an electronic application for low-acuity patients visiting an emergency department
title Safety assessment of a redirection program using an electronic application for low-acuity patients visiting an emergency department
title_full Safety assessment of a redirection program using an electronic application for low-acuity patients visiting an emergency department
title_fullStr Safety assessment of a redirection program using an electronic application for low-acuity patients visiting an emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Safety assessment of a redirection program using an electronic application for low-acuity patients visiting an emergency department
title_short Safety assessment of a redirection program using an electronic application for low-acuity patients visiting an emergency department
title_sort safety assessment of a redirection program using an electronic application for low-acuity patients visiting an emergency department
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9052637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35488215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00626-4
work_keys_str_mv AT feralpierssensannelaure safetyassessmentofaredirectionprogramusinganelectronicapplicationforlowacuitypatientsvisitinganemergencydepartment
AT morrisjudy safetyassessmentofaredirectionprogramusinganelectronicapplicationforlowacuitypatientsvisitinganemergencydepartment
AT marquismartin safetyassessmentofaredirectionprogramusinganelectronicapplicationforlowacuitypatientsvisitinganemergencydepartment
AT daoustraoul safetyassessmentofaredirectionprogramusinganelectronicapplicationforlowacuitypatientsvisitinganemergencydepartment
AT cournoyeralexis safetyassessmentofaredirectionprogramusinganelectronicapplicationforlowacuitypatientsvisitinganemergencydepartment
AT lessardjustine safetyassessmentofaredirectionprogramusinganelectronicapplicationforlowacuitypatientsvisitinganemergencydepartment
AT berthelotsimon safetyassessmentofaredirectionprogramusinganelectronicapplicationforlowacuitypatientsvisitinganemergencydepartment
AT messieralexandre safetyassessmentofaredirectionprogramusinganelectronicapplicationforlowacuitypatientsvisitinganemergencydepartment