Cargando…

Smartphone movement sensors for the remote monitoring of respiratory rates: Technical validation

BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mHealth) offers potential benefits to both patients and healthcare systems. Existing remote technologies to measure respiratory rates have limitations such as cost, accessibility and reliability. Using smartphone sensors to measure respiratory rates may offer a potential s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valentine, Sophie, Cunningham, Adam C., Klasmer, Benjamin, Dabbah, Mohammad, Balabanovic, Marko, Aral, Mert, Vahdat, Dan, Plans, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9052820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35493956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076221089090
_version_ 1784696865142341632
author Valentine, Sophie
Cunningham, Adam C.
Klasmer, Benjamin
Dabbah, Mohammad
Balabanovic, Marko
Aral, Mert
Vahdat, Dan
Plans, David
author_facet Valentine, Sophie
Cunningham, Adam C.
Klasmer, Benjamin
Dabbah, Mohammad
Balabanovic, Marko
Aral, Mert
Vahdat, Dan
Plans, David
author_sort Valentine, Sophie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mHealth) offers potential benefits to both patients and healthcare systems. Existing remote technologies to measure respiratory rates have limitations such as cost, accessibility and reliability. Using smartphone sensors to measure respiratory rates may offer a potential solution to these issues. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to conduct a comprehensive assessment of a novel mHealth smartphone application designed to measure respiratory rates using movement sensors. METHODS: In Study 1, 15 participants simultaneously measured their respiratory rates with the app and a Food and Drug Administration-cleared reference device. A novel reference analysis method to allow the app to be evaluated ‘in the wild’ was also developed. In Study 2, 165 participants measured their respiratory rates using the app, and these measures were compared to the novel reference. The usability of the app was also assessed in both studies. RESULTS: The app, when compared to the Food and Drug Administration-cleared and novel references, respectively, showed a mean absolute error of 1.65 (SD  =  1.49) and 1.14 (1.44), relative mean absolute error of 12.2 (9.23) and 9.5 (18.70) and bias of 0.81 (limits of agreement = –3.27 to 4.89) and 0.08 (–3.68 to 3.51). Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.700 and 0.885. Ninety-three percent of participants successfully operated the app on their first use. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy and usability of the app demonstrated here in individuals with a normal respiratory rate range show promise for the use of mHealth solutions employing smartphone sensors to remotely monitor respiratory rates. Further research should validate the benefits that this technology may offer patients and healthcare systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9052820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90528202022-04-30 Smartphone movement sensors for the remote monitoring of respiratory rates: Technical validation Valentine, Sophie Cunningham, Adam C. Klasmer, Benjamin Dabbah, Mohammad Balabanovic, Marko Aral, Mert Vahdat, Dan Plans, David Digit Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mHealth) offers potential benefits to both patients and healthcare systems. Existing remote technologies to measure respiratory rates have limitations such as cost, accessibility and reliability. Using smartphone sensors to measure respiratory rates may offer a potential solution to these issues. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to conduct a comprehensive assessment of a novel mHealth smartphone application designed to measure respiratory rates using movement sensors. METHODS: In Study 1, 15 participants simultaneously measured their respiratory rates with the app and a Food and Drug Administration-cleared reference device. A novel reference analysis method to allow the app to be evaluated ‘in the wild’ was also developed. In Study 2, 165 participants measured their respiratory rates using the app, and these measures were compared to the novel reference. The usability of the app was also assessed in both studies. RESULTS: The app, when compared to the Food and Drug Administration-cleared and novel references, respectively, showed a mean absolute error of 1.65 (SD  =  1.49) and 1.14 (1.44), relative mean absolute error of 12.2 (9.23) and 9.5 (18.70) and bias of 0.81 (limits of agreement = –3.27 to 4.89) and 0.08 (–3.68 to 3.51). Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.700 and 0.885. Ninety-three percent of participants successfully operated the app on their first use. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy and usability of the app demonstrated here in individuals with a normal respiratory rate range show promise for the use of mHealth solutions employing smartphone sensors to remotely monitor respiratory rates. Further research should validate the benefits that this technology may offer patients and healthcare systems. SAGE Publications 2022-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9052820/ /pubmed/35493956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076221089090 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Valentine, Sophie
Cunningham, Adam C.
Klasmer, Benjamin
Dabbah, Mohammad
Balabanovic, Marko
Aral, Mert
Vahdat, Dan
Plans, David
Smartphone movement sensors for the remote monitoring of respiratory rates: Technical validation
title Smartphone movement sensors for the remote monitoring of respiratory rates: Technical validation
title_full Smartphone movement sensors for the remote monitoring of respiratory rates: Technical validation
title_fullStr Smartphone movement sensors for the remote monitoring of respiratory rates: Technical validation
title_full_unstemmed Smartphone movement sensors for the remote monitoring of respiratory rates: Technical validation
title_short Smartphone movement sensors for the remote monitoring of respiratory rates: Technical validation
title_sort smartphone movement sensors for the remote monitoring of respiratory rates: technical validation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9052820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35493956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076221089090
work_keys_str_mv AT valentinesophie smartphonemovementsensorsfortheremotemonitoringofrespiratoryratestechnicalvalidation
AT cunninghamadamc smartphonemovementsensorsfortheremotemonitoringofrespiratoryratestechnicalvalidation
AT klasmerbenjamin smartphonemovementsensorsfortheremotemonitoringofrespiratoryratestechnicalvalidation
AT dabbahmohammad smartphonemovementsensorsfortheremotemonitoringofrespiratoryratestechnicalvalidation
AT balabanovicmarko smartphonemovementsensorsfortheremotemonitoringofrespiratoryratestechnicalvalidation
AT aralmert smartphonemovementsensorsfortheremotemonitoringofrespiratoryratestechnicalvalidation
AT vahdatdan smartphonemovementsensorsfortheremotemonitoringofrespiratoryratestechnicalvalidation
AT plansdavid smartphonemovementsensorsfortheremotemonitoringofrespiratoryratestechnicalvalidation