Cargando…
What makes administrative data “research-ready”? A systematic review and thematic analysis of published literature
INTRODUCTION: Administrative data are a valuable research resource, but are under-utilised in the UK due to governance, technical and other barriers (e.g., the time and effort taken to gain secure data access). In recent years, there has been considerable government investment in making administrati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Swansea University
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9052961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35520099 http://dx.doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v7i1.1718 |
_version_ | 1784696894534975488 |
---|---|
author | Grath-Lone, Louise Mc Jay, Matthew A. Blackburn, Ruth Gordon, Emma Zylbersztejn, Ania Wijlaars, Linda Gilbert, Ruth |
author_facet | Grath-Lone, Louise Mc Jay, Matthew A. Blackburn, Ruth Gordon, Emma Zylbersztejn, Ania Wijlaars, Linda Gilbert, Ruth |
author_sort | Grath-Lone, Louise Mc |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Administrative data are a valuable research resource, but are under-utilised in the UK due to governance, technical and other barriers (e.g., the time and effort taken to gain secure data access). In recent years, there has been considerable government investment in making administrative data “research-ready”, but there is no definition of what this term means. A common understanding of what constitutes research-ready administrative data is needed to establish clear principles and frameworks for their development and the realisation of their full research potential. OBJECTIVE: To define the characteristics of research-ready administrative data based on a systematic review and synthesis of existing literature. METHODS: On 29(th) June 2021, we systematically searched seven electronic databases for (1) peer-reviewed literature (2) related to research-ready administrative data (3) written in the English language. Following supplementary searches and snowball screening, we conducted a thematic analysis of the identified relevant literature. RESULTS: Overall, we screened 2,375 records and identified 38 relevant studies published between 2012 and 2021. Most related to administrative data from the UK and US and particularly to health data. The term research-ready was used inconsistently in the literature and there was some conflation with the concept of data being ready for statistical analysis. From the thematic analysis, we identified five defining characteristics of research-ready administrative data: (a) accessible, (b) broad, (c) curated, (d) documented and (e) enhanced for research purposes. CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed characteristics of research-ready administrative data could act as a starting point to help data owners and researchers develop common principles and standards. In the more immediate term, the proposed characteristics are a useful framework for cataloguing existing research-ready administrative databases and relevant resources that can support their development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9052961 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Swansea University |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90529612022-05-04 What makes administrative data “research-ready”? A systematic review and thematic analysis of published literature Grath-Lone, Louise Mc Jay, Matthew A. Blackburn, Ruth Gordon, Emma Zylbersztejn, Ania Wijlaars, Linda Gilbert, Ruth Int J Popul Data Sci Population Data Science INTRODUCTION: Administrative data are a valuable research resource, but are under-utilised in the UK due to governance, technical and other barriers (e.g., the time and effort taken to gain secure data access). In recent years, there has been considerable government investment in making administrative data “research-ready”, but there is no definition of what this term means. A common understanding of what constitutes research-ready administrative data is needed to establish clear principles and frameworks for their development and the realisation of their full research potential. OBJECTIVE: To define the characteristics of research-ready administrative data based on a systematic review and synthesis of existing literature. METHODS: On 29(th) June 2021, we systematically searched seven electronic databases for (1) peer-reviewed literature (2) related to research-ready administrative data (3) written in the English language. Following supplementary searches and snowball screening, we conducted a thematic analysis of the identified relevant literature. RESULTS: Overall, we screened 2,375 records and identified 38 relevant studies published between 2012 and 2021. Most related to administrative data from the UK and US and particularly to health data. The term research-ready was used inconsistently in the literature and there was some conflation with the concept of data being ready for statistical analysis. From the thematic analysis, we identified five defining characteristics of research-ready administrative data: (a) accessible, (b) broad, (c) curated, (d) documented and (e) enhanced for research purposes. CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed characteristics of research-ready administrative data could act as a starting point to help data owners and researchers develop common principles and standards. In the more immediate term, the proposed characteristics are a useful framework for cataloguing existing research-ready administrative databases and relevant resources that can support their development. Swansea University 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9052961/ /pubmed/35520099 http://dx.doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v7i1.1718 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Population Data Science Grath-Lone, Louise Mc Jay, Matthew A. Blackburn, Ruth Gordon, Emma Zylbersztejn, Ania Wijlaars, Linda Gilbert, Ruth What makes administrative data “research-ready”? A systematic review and thematic analysis of published literature |
title | What makes administrative data “research-ready”? A systematic review and thematic analysis of published literature |
title_full | What makes administrative data “research-ready”? A systematic review and thematic analysis of published literature |
title_fullStr | What makes administrative data “research-ready”? A systematic review and thematic analysis of published literature |
title_full_unstemmed | What makes administrative data “research-ready”? A systematic review and thematic analysis of published literature |
title_short | What makes administrative data “research-ready”? A systematic review and thematic analysis of published literature |
title_sort | what makes administrative data “research-ready”? a systematic review and thematic analysis of published literature |
topic | Population Data Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9052961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35520099 http://dx.doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v7i1.1718 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grathlonelouisemc whatmakesadministrativedataresearchreadyasystematicreviewandthematicanalysisofpublishedliterature AT jaymatthewa whatmakesadministrativedataresearchreadyasystematicreviewandthematicanalysisofpublishedliterature AT blackburnruth whatmakesadministrativedataresearchreadyasystematicreviewandthematicanalysisofpublishedliterature AT gordonemma whatmakesadministrativedataresearchreadyasystematicreviewandthematicanalysisofpublishedliterature AT zylbersztejnania whatmakesadministrativedataresearchreadyasystematicreviewandthematicanalysisofpublishedliterature AT wijlaarslinda whatmakesadministrativedataresearchreadyasystematicreviewandthematicanalysisofpublishedliterature AT gilbertruth whatmakesadministrativedataresearchreadyasystematicreviewandthematicanalysisofpublishedliterature |