Cargando…

Dynamics of human take and animal predation on sea turtle nests in Northwest Costa Rica

Many conservation projects relocate sea turtle eggs to hatcheries to protect the sea turtle nests from the anthropogenic and natural threats they face in the early stages of development. The Rescue Center for Endangered Marine Species (CREMA) manages four sea turtle conservation projects on the nest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reavis, Janie L., Rojas-Cañizales, Daniela, Mejías-Balsalobre, Carmen, Naranjo, Isabel, Arauz, Randall, Senko, Jesse F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9053298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35497194
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12925
_version_ 1784696967531593728
author Reavis, Janie L.
Rojas-Cañizales, Daniela
Mejías-Balsalobre, Carmen
Naranjo, Isabel
Arauz, Randall
Senko, Jesse F.
author_facet Reavis, Janie L.
Rojas-Cañizales, Daniela
Mejías-Balsalobre, Carmen
Naranjo, Isabel
Arauz, Randall
Senko, Jesse F.
author_sort Reavis, Janie L.
collection PubMed
description Many conservation projects relocate sea turtle eggs to hatcheries to protect the sea turtle nests from the anthropogenic and natural threats they face in the early stages of development. The Rescue Center for Endangered Marine Species (CREMA) manages four sea turtle conservation projects on the nesting beaches of the Southern Nicoya Peninsula in Costa Rica, where the predominant nesting activity is from olive ridley turtles (Lepidochelys olivacea). Two of these nesting projects are based in Costa de Oro and San Miguel, which are adjacent beaches divided by an estuary. In this study, we compared the dynamics and rates of human and animal predation of nests prior to being relocated to the hatchery on both nesting beaches from 2012 to 2018. We hypothesized that human take and animal predation were compensatory threats, meaning that lower human take may result in higher animal predation, and vice versa, resulting in a similar number of nests lost to predation overall. We discuss the community-based conservation programs on both beaches, one of which has been monitored since 1998 (San Miguel) and the other of which has been monitored since 2012 (Costa de Oro). We found that Costa de Oro exhibited high rates of human take with up to 51% of nests being extracted per season, which has decreased since the conservation project was established. Human take was significantly higher than animal predation on both beaches and human take was significantly higher in Costa de Oro. While San Miguel exhibited higher animal predation, the difference was not statistically significant. Higher depredation by animals corresponded to higher overall nest abundance on both beaches. We were unable to find evidence that human take or animal predation increased in the absence of the other threat, suggesting a lack of compensatory effects of predation. Our findings support further analysis of animal predation and a continuation of patrol-based conservation efforts as well as community outreach to attempt to merge cultural values with sea turtle conservation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9053298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90532982022-04-30 Dynamics of human take and animal predation on sea turtle nests in Northwest Costa Rica Reavis, Janie L. Rojas-Cañizales, Daniela Mejías-Balsalobre, Carmen Naranjo, Isabel Arauz, Randall Senko, Jesse F. PeerJ Conservation Biology Many conservation projects relocate sea turtle eggs to hatcheries to protect the sea turtle nests from the anthropogenic and natural threats they face in the early stages of development. The Rescue Center for Endangered Marine Species (CREMA) manages four sea turtle conservation projects on the nesting beaches of the Southern Nicoya Peninsula in Costa Rica, where the predominant nesting activity is from olive ridley turtles (Lepidochelys olivacea). Two of these nesting projects are based in Costa de Oro and San Miguel, which are adjacent beaches divided by an estuary. In this study, we compared the dynamics and rates of human and animal predation of nests prior to being relocated to the hatchery on both nesting beaches from 2012 to 2018. We hypothesized that human take and animal predation were compensatory threats, meaning that lower human take may result in higher animal predation, and vice versa, resulting in a similar number of nests lost to predation overall. We discuss the community-based conservation programs on both beaches, one of which has been monitored since 1998 (San Miguel) and the other of which has been monitored since 2012 (Costa de Oro). We found that Costa de Oro exhibited high rates of human take with up to 51% of nests being extracted per season, which has decreased since the conservation project was established. Human take was significantly higher than animal predation on both beaches and human take was significantly higher in Costa de Oro. While San Miguel exhibited higher animal predation, the difference was not statistically significant. Higher depredation by animals corresponded to higher overall nest abundance on both beaches. We were unable to find evidence that human take or animal predation increased in the absence of the other threat, suggesting a lack of compensatory effects of predation. Our findings support further analysis of animal predation and a continuation of patrol-based conservation efforts as well as community outreach to attempt to merge cultural values with sea turtle conservation. PeerJ Inc. 2022-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9053298/ /pubmed/35497194 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12925 Text en ©2022 Reavis et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Conservation Biology
Reavis, Janie L.
Rojas-Cañizales, Daniela
Mejías-Balsalobre, Carmen
Naranjo, Isabel
Arauz, Randall
Senko, Jesse F.
Dynamics of human take and animal predation on sea turtle nests in Northwest Costa Rica
title Dynamics of human take and animal predation on sea turtle nests in Northwest Costa Rica
title_full Dynamics of human take and animal predation on sea turtle nests in Northwest Costa Rica
title_fullStr Dynamics of human take and animal predation on sea turtle nests in Northwest Costa Rica
title_full_unstemmed Dynamics of human take and animal predation on sea turtle nests in Northwest Costa Rica
title_short Dynamics of human take and animal predation on sea turtle nests in Northwest Costa Rica
title_sort dynamics of human take and animal predation on sea turtle nests in northwest costa rica
topic Conservation Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9053298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35497194
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12925
work_keys_str_mv AT reavisjaniel dynamicsofhumantakeandanimalpredationonseaturtlenestsinnorthwestcostarica
AT rojascanizalesdaniela dynamicsofhumantakeandanimalpredationonseaturtlenestsinnorthwestcostarica
AT mejiasbalsalobrecarmen dynamicsofhumantakeandanimalpredationonseaturtlenestsinnorthwestcostarica
AT naranjoisabel dynamicsofhumantakeandanimalpredationonseaturtlenestsinnorthwestcostarica
AT arauzrandall dynamicsofhumantakeandanimalpredationonseaturtlenestsinnorthwestcostarica
AT senkojessef dynamicsofhumantakeandanimalpredationonseaturtlenestsinnorthwestcostarica