Cargando…

The effect of continuous tubular reactor technologies on the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass at pilot-scale for bioethanol production

A pilot-scale continuous tubular reactor (PCTR) was employed for the isothermal pretreatment of agave bagasse (AG), corn stover (CS), sugarcane bagasse (SC), and wheat straw (WS) with three residence times. The objective was to evaluate the impact of this technology on enzymatic saccharification at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pérez-Pimienta, José A., Papa, Gabriela, Gladden, John M., Simmons, Blake A., Sanchez, Arturo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9053731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35517195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ra04031b
_version_ 1784697034925670400
author Pérez-Pimienta, José A.
Papa, Gabriela
Gladden, John M.
Simmons, Blake A.
Sanchez, Arturo
author_facet Pérez-Pimienta, José A.
Papa, Gabriela
Gladden, John M.
Simmons, Blake A.
Sanchez, Arturo
author_sort Pérez-Pimienta, José A.
collection PubMed
description A pilot-scale continuous tubular reactor (PCTR) was employed for the isothermal pretreatment of agave bagasse (AG), corn stover (CS), sugarcane bagasse (SC), and wheat straw (WS) with three residence times. The objective was to evaluate the impact of this technology on enzymatic saccharification at low solid loadings (4% w/v) and on sequential saccharification and glucose fermentation (SSF) at high solid loading (20% w/v) for bioethanol production. Deformation in cellulose and hemicellulose linkages and xylan removal of up to 60% were achieved after pretreatment. The shortest residence time tested (20 min) resulted in the highest glucan to glucose conversion in the low solid loading (4% w/v) enzymatic saccharification step for AG (83.3%), WS (82.8%), CS (76.1%) and SC (51.8%). Final ethanol concentrations after SSF from PCTR-pretreated biomass were in the range of 38 to 42 g L(−1) (11.0–11.3 kg of ethanol per 100 kg of untreated biomass). Additionally, PCTR performance in terms of xylan removal and sugar release were compared with those from a batch lab-scale autohydrolysis reactor (BLR) under the same process conditions. BLR removed higher xylan amounts than those achieved in the PCTR. However, higher sugar concentrations were obtained with PCTR for SC (13.2 g L(−1)vs. 10.5 g L(−1)) and WS (21.7 g L(−1)vs. 18.8 g L(−1)), whilst differences were not significant (p < 0.05) with BLR for AG (16.0 g L(−1)vs. 16.3 g L(−1)) and CS (18.7 g L(−1)vs. 18.4 g L(−1)).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9053731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90537312022-05-04 The effect of continuous tubular reactor technologies on the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass at pilot-scale for bioethanol production Pérez-Pimienta, José A. Papa, Gabriela Gladden, John M. Simmons, Blake A. Sanchez, Arturo RSC Adv Chemistry A pilot-scale continuous tubular reactor (PCTR) was employed for the isothermal pretreatment of agave bagasse (AG), corn stover (CS), sugarcane bagasse (SC), and wheat straw (WS) with three residence times. The objective was to evaluate the impact of this technology on enzymatic saccharification at low solid loadings (4% w/v) and on sequential saccharification and glucose fermentation (SSF) at high solid loading (20% w/v) for bioethanol production. Deformation in cellulose and hemicellulose linkages and xylan removal of up to 60% were achieved after pretreatment. The shortest residence time tested (20 min) resulted in the highest glucan to glucose conversion in the low solid loading (4% w/v) enzymatic saccharification step for AG (83.3%), WS (82.8%), CS (76.1%) and SC (51.8%). Final ethanol concentrations after SSF from PCTR-pretreated biomass were in the range of 38 to 42 g L(−1) (11.0–11.3 kg of ethanol per 100 kg of untreated biomass). Additionally, PCTR performance in terms of xylan removal and sugar release were compared with those from a batch lab-scale autohydrolysis reactor (BLR) under the same process conditions. BLR removed higher xylan amounts than those achieved in the PCTR. However, higher sugar concentrations were obtained with PCTR for SC (13.2 g L(−1)vs. 10.5 g L(−1)) and WS (21.7 g L(−1)vs. 18.8 g L(−1)), whilst differences were not significant (p < 0.05) with BLR for AG (16.0 g L(−1)vs. 16.3 g L(−1)) and CS (18.7 g L(−1)vs. 18.4 g L(−1)). The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9053731/ /pubmed/35517195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ra04031b Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Pérez-Pimienta, José A.
Papa, Gabriela
Gladden, John M.
Simmons, Blake A.
Sanchez, Arturo
The effect of continuous tubular reactor technologies on the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass at pilot-scale for bioethanol production
title The effect of continuous tubular reactor technologies on the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass at pilot-scale for bioethanol production
title_full The effect of continuous tubular reactor technologies on the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass at pilot-scale for bioethanol production
title_fullStr The effect of continuous tubular reactor technologies on the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass at pilot-scale for bioethanol production
title_full_unstemmed The effect of continuous tubular reactor technologies on the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass at pilot-scale for bioethanol production
title_short The effect of continuous tubular reactor technologies on the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass at pilot-scale for bioethanol production
title_sort effect of continuous tubular reactor technologies on the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass at pilot-scale for bioethanol production
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9053731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35517195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ra04031b
work_keys_str_mv AT perezpimientajosea theeffectofcontinuoustubularreactortechnologiesonthepretreatmentoflignocellulosicbiomassatpilotscaleforbioethanolproduction
AT papagabriela theeffectofcontinuoustubularreactortechnologiesonthepretreatmentoflignocellulosicbiomassatpilotscaleforbioethanolproduction
AT gladdenjohnm theeffectofcontinuoustubularreactortechnologiesonthepretreatmentoflignocellulosicbiomassatpilotscaleforbioethanolproduction
AT simmonsblakea theeffectofcontinuoustubularreactortechnologiesonthepretreatmentoflignocellulosicbiomassatpilotscaleforbioethanolproduction
AT sanchezarturo theeffectofcontinuoustubularreactortechnologiesonthepretreatmentoflignocellulosicbiomassatpilotscaleforbioethanolproduction
AT perezpimientajosea effectofcontinuoustubularreactortechnologiesonthepretreatmentoflignocellulosicbiomassatpilotscaleforbioethanolproduction
AT papagabriela effectofcontinuoustubularreactortechnologiesonthepretreatmentoflignocellulosicbiomassatpilotscaleforbioethanolproduction
AT gladdenjohnm effectofcontinuoustubularreactortechnologiesonthepretreatmentoflignocellulosicbiomassatpilotscaleforbioethanolproduction
AT simmonsblakea effectofcontinuoustubularreactortechnologiesonthepretreatmentoflignocellulosicbiomassatpilotscaleforbioethanolproduction
AT sanchezarturo effectofcontinuoustubularreactortechnologiesonthepretreatmentoflignocellulosicbiomassatpilotscaleforbioethanolproduction