Cargando…
The effect of continuous tubular reactor technologies on the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass at pilot-scale for bioethanol production
A pilot-scale continuous tubular reactor (PCTR) was employed for the isothermal pretreatment of agave bagasse (AG), corn stover (CS), sugarcane bagasse (SC), and wheat straw (WS) with three residence times. The objective was to evaluate the impact of this technology on enzymatic saccharification at...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society of Chemistry
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9053731/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35517195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ra04031b |
_version_ | 1784697034925670400 |
---|---|
author | Pérez-Pimienta, José A. Papa, Gabriela Gladden, John M. Simmons, Blake A. Sanchez, Arturo |
author_facet | Pérez-Pimienta, José A. Papa, Gabriela Gladden, John M. Simmons, Blake A. Sanchez, Arturo |
author_sort | Pérez-Pimienta, José A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A pilot-scale continuous tubular reactor (PCTR) was employed for the isothermal pretreatment of agave bagasse (AG), corn stover (CS), sugarcane bagasse (SC), and wheat straw (WS) with three residence times. The objective was to evaluate the impact of this technology on enzymatic saccharification at low solid loadings (4% w/v) and on sequential saccharification and glucose fermentation (SSF) at high solid loading (20% w/v) for bioethanol production. Deformation in cellulose and hemicellulose linkages and xylan removal of up to 60% were achieved after pretreatment. The shortest residence time tested (20 min) resulted in the highest glucan to glucose conversion in the low solid loading (4% w/v) enzymatic saccharification step for AG (83.3%), WS (82.8%), CS (76.1%) and SC (51.8%). Final ethanol concentrations after SSF from PCTR-pretreated biomass were in the range of 38 to 42 g L(−1) (11.0–11.3 kg of ethanol per 100 kg of untreated biomass). Additionally, PCTR performance in terms of xylan removal and sugar release were compared with those from a batch lab-scale autohydrolysis reactor (BLR) under the same process conditions. BLR removed higher xylan amounts than those achieved in the PCTR. However, higher sugar concentrations were obtained with PCTR for SC (13.2 g L(−1)vs. 10.5 g L(−1)) and WS (21.7 g L(−1)vs. 18.8 g L(−1)), whilst differences were not significant (p < 0.05) with BLR for AG (16.0 g L(−1)vs. 16.3 g L(−1)) and CS (18.7 g L(−1)vs. 18.4 g L(−1)). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9053731 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Royal Society of Chemistry |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90537312022-05-04 The effect of continuous tubular reactor technologies on the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass at pilot-scale for bioethanol production Pérez-Pimienta, José A. Papa, Gabriela Gladden, John M. Simmons, Blake A. Sanchez, Arturo RSC Adv Chemistry A pilot-scale continuous tubular reactor (PCTR) was employed for the isothermal pretreatment of agave bagasse (AG), corn stover (CS), sugarcane bagasse (SC), and wheat straw (WS) with three residence times. The objective was to evaluate the impact of this technology on enzymatic saccharification at low solid loadings (4% w/v) and on sequential saccharification and glucose fermentation (SSF) at high solid loading (20% w/v) for bioethanol production. Deformation in cellulose and hemicellulose linkages and xylan removal of up to 60% were achieved after pretreatment. The shortest residence time tested (20 min) resulted in the highest glucan to glucose conversion in the low solid loading (4% w/v) enzymatic saccharification step for AG (83.3%), WS (82.8%), CS (76.1%) and SC (51.8%). Final ethanol concentrations after SSF from PCTR-pretreated biomass were in the range of 38 to 42 g L(−1) (11.0–11.3 kg of ethanol per 100 kg of untreated biomass). Additionally, PCTR performance in terms of xylan removal and sugar release were compared with those from a batch lab-scale autohydrolysis reactor (BLR) under the same process conditions. BLR removed higher xylan amounts than those achieved in the PCTR. However, higher sugar concentrations were obtained with PCTR for SC (13.2 g L(−1)vs. 10.5 g L(−1)) and WS (21.7 g L(−1)vs. 18.8 g L(−1)), whilst differences were not significant (p < 0.05) with BLR for AG (16.0 g L(−1)vs. 16.3 g L(−1)) and CS (18.7 g L(−1)vs. 18.4 g L(−1)). The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9053731/ /pubmed/35517195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ra04031b Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Chemistry Pérez-Pimienta, José A. Papa, Gabriela Gladden, John M. Simmons, Blake A. Sanchez, Arturo The effect of continuous tubular reactor technologies on the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass at pilot-scale for bioethanol production |
title | The effect of continuous tubular reactor technologies on the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass at pilot-scale for bioethanol production |
title_full | The effect of continuous tubular reactor technologies on the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass at pilot-scale for bioethanol production |
title_fullStr | The effect of continuous tubular reactor technologies on the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass at pilot-scale for bioethanol production |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of continuous tubular reactor technologies on the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass at pilot-scale for bioethanol production |
title_short | The effect of continuous tubular reactor technologies on the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass at pilot-scale for bioethanol production |
title_sort | effect of continuous tubular reactor technologies on the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass at pilot-scale for bioethanol production |
topic | Chemistry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9053731/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35517195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ra04031b |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perezpimientajosea theeffectofcontinuoustubularreactortechnologiesonthepretreatmentoflignocellulosicbiomassatpilotscaleforbioethanolproduction AT papagabriela theeffectofcontinuoustubularreactortechnologiesonthepretreatmentoflignocellulosicbiomassatpilotscaleforbioethanolproduction AT gladdenjohnm theeffectofcontinuoustubularreactortechnologiesonthepretreatmentoflignocellulosicbiomassatpilotscaleforbioethanolproduction AT simmonsblakea theeffectofcontinuoustubularreactortechnologiesonthepretreatmentoflignocellulosicbiomassatpilotscaleforbioethanolproduction AT sanchezarturo theeffectofcontinuoustubularreactortechnologiesonthepretreatmentoflignocellulosicbiomassatpilotscaleforbioethanolproduction AT perezpimientajosea effectofcontinuoustubularreactortechnologiesonthepretreatmentoflignocellulosicbiomassatpilotscaleforbioethanolproduction AT papagabriela effectofcontinuoustubularreactortechnologiesonthepretreatmentoflignocellulosicbiomassatpilotscaleforbioethanolproduction AT gladdenjohnm effectofcontinuoustubularreactortechnologiesonthepretreatmentoflignocellulosicbiomassatpilotscaleforbioethanolproduction AT simmonsblakea effectofcontinuoustubularreactortechnologiesonthepretreatmentoflignocellulosicbiomassatpilotscaleforbioethanolproduction AT sanchezarturo effectofcontinuoustubularreactortechnologiesonthepretreatmentoflignocellulosicbiomassatpilotscaleforbioethanolproduction |