Cargando…

China’s Research Evaluation Reform: What are the Consequences for Global Science?

In the 1990s, China created a research evaluation system based on publications indexed in the Science Citation Index (SCI) and on the Journal Impact Factor. Such system helped the country become the largest contributor to the scientific literature and increased the position of Chinese universities i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shu, Fei, Liu, Sichen, Larivière, Vincent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9054502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35530168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09468-7
_version_ 1784697202354946048
author Shu, Fei
Liu, Sichen
Larivière, Vincent
author_facet Shu, Fei
Liu, Sichen
Larivière, Vincent
author_sort Shu, Fei
collection PubMed
description In the 1990s, China created a research evaluation system based on publications indexed in the Science Citation Index (SCI) and on the Journal Impact Factor. Such system helped the country become the largest contributor to the scientific literature and increased the position of Chinese universities in international rankings. Although the system had been criticized by many because of its adverse effects, the policy reform for research evaluation crawled until the breakout of the COVID-19 pandemic, which accidently accelerates the process of policy reform. This paper highlights the background and principles of this reform, provides evidence of its effects, and discusses the implications for global science.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9054502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90545022022-05-02 China’s Research Evaluation Reform: What are the Consequences for Global Science? Shu, Fei Liu, Sichen Larivière, Vincent Minerva Article In the 1990s, China created a research evaluation system based on publications indexed in the Science Citation Index (SCI) and on the Journal Impact Factor. Such system helped the country become the largest contributor to the scientific literature and increased the position of Chinese universities in international rankings. Although the system had been criticized by many because of its adverse effects, the policy reform for research evaluation crawled until the breakout of the COVID-19 pandemic, which accidently accelerates the process of policy reform. This paper highlights the background and principles of this reform, provides evidence of its effects, and discusses the implications for global science. Springer Netherlands 2022-04-30 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9054502/ /pubmed/35530168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09468-7 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Shu, Fei
Liu, Sichen
Larivière, Vincent
China’s Research Evaluation Reform: What are the Consequences for Global Science?
title China’s Research Evaluation Reform: What are the Consequences for Global Science?
title_full China’s Research Evaluation Reform: What are the Consequences for Global Science?
title_fullStr China’s Research Evaluation Reform: What are the Consequences for Global Science?
title_full_unstemmed China’s Research Evaluation Reform: What are the Consequences for Global Science?
title_short China’s Research Evaluation Reform: What are the Consequences for Global Science?
title_sort china’s research evaluation reform: what are the consequences for global science?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9054502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35530168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09468-7
work_keys_str_mv AT shufei chinasresearchevaluationreformwhataretheconsequencesforglobalscience
AT liusichen chinasresearchevaluationreformwhataretheconsequencesforglobalscience
AT larivierevincent chinasresearchevaluationreformwhataretheconsequencesforglobalscience