Cargando…
Subcutaneous ICD for more and transvenous ICD for few?!
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have been shown to reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death in primary or secondary prevention with thousands of ICDs implanted every year worldwide. Whilst ICD are more commonly implanted transvenously (TV), this approach carries high risk of peri- and...
Autores principales: | Abdin, Amr, Aktaa, Suleman |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9054871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35179615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-01990-8 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Transvenous vs. subcutaneous ICDs after transvenous device complication
por: Willy, K, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
An Overview of Clinical Outcomes in Transvenous and Subcutaneous ICD Patients
por: Baalman, S. W. E., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Pooled Analysis of Complications with Transvenous ICD Compared to Subcutaneous ICD in Patients with Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Arrhythmia
por: Eckert, Henrik, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Subcutaneous ICD implantation in a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy after transvenous ICD failure: A case report
por: Baroni, Matteo, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Device-related complications in subcutaneous versus transvenous ICD: a secondary analysis of the PRAETORIAN trial
por: Knops, Reinoud E, et al.
Publicado: (2022)