Cargando…
Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: GLORIA-AF Registry
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prospectively collected data comparing the safety and effectiveness of individual non-vitamin K antagonists (NOACs) are lacking. Our objective was to directly compare the effectiveness and safety of NOACs in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: In...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9054878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35294625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-01996-2 |
_version_ | 1784697290886217728 |
---|---|
author | Lip, Gregory Y. H. Kotalczyk, Agnieszka Teutsch, Christine Diener, Hans-Christoph Dubner, Sergio J. Halperin, Jonathan L. Ma, Chang-Sheng Rothman, Kenneth J. Marler, Sabrina Gurusamy, Venkatesh Kumar Huisman, Menno V. |
author_facet | Lip, Gregory Y. H. Kotalczyk, Agnieszka Teutsch, Christine Diener, Hans-Christoph Dubner, Sergio J. Halperin, Jonathan L. Ma, Chang-Sheng Rothman, Kenneth J. Marler, Sabrina Gurusamy, Venkatesh Kumar Huisman, Menno V. |
author_sort | Lip, Gregory Y. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prospectively collected data comparing the safety and effectiveness of individual non-vitamin K antagonists (NOACs) are lacking. Our objective was to directly compare the effectiveness and safety of NOACs in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: In GLORIA-AF, a large, prospective, global registry program, consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AF were followed for 3 years. The comparative analyses for (1) dabigatran vs rivaroxaban or apixaban and (2) rivaroxaban vs apixaban were performed on propensity score (PS)-matched patient sets. Proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for outcomes of interest. RESULTS: The GLORIA-AF Phase III registry enrolled 21,300 patients between January 2014 and December 2016. Of these, 3839 were prescribed dabigatran, 4015 rivaroxaban and 4505 apixaban, with median ages of 71.0, 71.0, and 73.0 years, respectively. In the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dabigatran vs rivaroxaban were, for stroke: 1.27 (0.79–2.03), major bleeding 0.59 (0.40–0.88), myocardial infarction 0.68 (0.40–1.16), and all-cause death 0.86 (0.67–1.10). For the comparison of dabigatran vs apixaban, in the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs were, for stroke 1.16 (0.76–1.78), myocardial infarction 0.84 (0.48–1.46), major bleeding 0.98 (0.63–1.52) and all-cause death 1.01 (0.79–1.29). For the comparison of rivaroxaban vs apixaban, in the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs were, for stroke 0.78 (0.52–1.19), myocardial infarction 0.96 (0.63–1.45), major bleeding 1.54 (1.14–2.08), and all-cause death 0.97 (0.80–1.19). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with dabigatran had a 41% lower risk of major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban, but similar risks of stroke, MI, and death. Relative to apixaban, patients treated with dabigatran had similar risks of stroke, major bleeding, MI, and death. Rivaroxaban relative to apixaban had increased risk for major bleeding, but similar risks for stroke, MI, and death. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01468701, NCT01671007. Date of registration: September 2013. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-022-01996-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9054878 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90548782022-05-07 Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: GLORIA-AF Registry Lip, Gregory Y. H. Kotalczyk, Agnieszka Teutsch, Christine Diener, Hans-Christoph Dubner, Sergio J. Halperin, Jonathan L. Ma, Chang-Sheng Rothman, Kenneth J. Marler, Sabrina Gurusamy, Venkatesh Kumar Huisman, Menno V. Clin Res Cardiol Original Paper BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prospectively collected data comparing the safety and effectiveness of individual non-vitamin K antagonists (NOACs) are lacking. Our objective was to directly compare the effectiveness and safety of NOACs in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: In GLORIA-AF, a large, prospective, global registry program, consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AF were followed for 3 years. The comparative analyses for (1) dabigatran vs rivaroxaban or apixaban and (2) rivaroxaban vs apixaban were performed on propensity score (PS)-matched patient sets. Proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for outcomes of interest. RESULTS: The GLORIA-AF Phase III registry enrolled 21,300 patients between January 2014 and December 2016. Of these, 3839 were prescribed dabigatran, 4015 rivaroxaban and 4505 apixaban, with median ages of 71.0, 71.0, and 73.0 years, respectively. In the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dabigatran vs rivaroxaban were, for stroke: 1.27 (0.79–2.03), major bleeding 0.59 (0.40–0.88), myocardial infarction 0.68 (0.40–1.16), and all-cause death 0.86 (0.67–1.10). For the comparison of dabigatran vs apixaban, in the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs were, for stroke 1.16 (0.76–1.78), myocardial infarction 0.84 (0.48–1.46), major bleeding 0.98 (0.63–1.52) and all-cause death 1.01 (0.79–1.29). For the comparison of rivaroxaban vs apixaban, in the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs were, for stroke 0.78 (0.52–1.19), myocardial infarction 0.96 (0.63–1.45), major bleeding 1.54 (1.14–2.08), and all-cause death 0.97 (0.80–1.19). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with dabigatran had a 41% lower risk of major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban, but similar risks of stroke, MI, and death. Relative to apixaban, patients treated with dabigatran had similar risks of stroke, major bleeding, MI, and death. Rivaroxaban relative to apixaban had increased risk for major bleeding, but similar risks for stroke, MI, and death. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01468701, NCT01671007. Date of registration: September 2013. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-022-01996-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-03-16 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9054878/ /pubmed/35294625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-01996-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Lip, Gregory Y. H. Kotalczyk, Agnieszka Teutsch, Christine Diener, Hans-Christoph Dubner, Sergio J. Halperin, Jonathan L. Ma, Chang-Sheng Rothman, Kenneth J. Marler, Sabrina Gurusamy, Venkatesh Kumar Huisman, Menno V. Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: GLORIA-AF Registry |
title | Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: GLORIA-AF Registry |
title_full | Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: GLORIA-AF Registry |
title_fullStr | Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: GLORIA-AF Registry |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: GLORIA-AF Registry |
title_short | Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: GLORIA-AF Registry |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin k antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: gloria-af registry |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9054878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35294625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-01996-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lipgregoryyh comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnonvitaminkantagonistsforatrialfibrillationinclinicalpracticegloriaafregistry AT kotalczykagnieszka comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnonvitaminkantagonistsforatrialfibrillationinclinicalpracticegloriaafregistry AT teutschchristine comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnonvitaminkantagonistsforatrialfibrillationinclinicalpracticegloriaafregistry AT dienerhanschristoph comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnonvitaminkantagonistsforatrialfibrillationinclinicalpracticegloriaafregistry AT dubnersergioj comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnonvitaminkantagonistsforatrialfibrillationinclinicalpracticegloriaafregistry AT halperinjonathanl comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnonvitaminkantagonistsforatrialfibrillationinclinicalpracticegloriaafregistry AT machangsheng comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnonvitaminkantagonistsforatrialfibrillationinclinicalpracticegloriaafregistry AT rothmankennethj comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnonvitaminkantagonistsforatrialfibrillationinclinicalpracticegloriaafregistry AT marlersabrina comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnonvitaminkantagonistsforatrialfibrillationinclinicalpracticegloriaafregistry AT gurusamyvenkateshkumar comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnonvitaminkantagonistsforatrialfibrillationinclinicalpracticegloriaafregistry AT huismanmennov comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnonvitaminkantagonistsforatrialfibrillationinclinicalpracticegloriaafregistry AT comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnonvitaminkantagonistsforatrialfibrillationinclinicalpracticegloriaafregistry |