Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: GLORIA-AF Registry

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prospectively collected data comparing the safety and effectiveness of individual non-vitamin K antagonists (NOACs) are lacking. Our objective was to directly compare the effectiveness and safety of NOACs in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lip, Gregory Y. H., Kotalczyk, Agnieszka, Teutsch, Christine, Diener, Hans-Christoph, Dubner, Sergio J., Halperin, Jonathan L., Ma, Chang-Sheng, Rothman, Kenneth J., Marler, Sabrina, Gurusamy, Venkatesh Kumar, Huisman, Menno V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9054878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35294625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-01996-2
_version_ 1784697290886217728
author Lip, Gregory Y. H.
Kotalczyk, Agnieszka
Teutsch, Christine
Diener, Hans-Christoph
Dubner, Sergio J.
Halperin, Jonathan L.
Ma, Chang-Sheng
Rothman, Kenneth J.
Marler, Sabrina
Gurusamy, Venkatesh Kumar
Huisman, Menno V.
author_facet Lip, Gregory Y. H.
Kotalczyk, Agnieszka
Teutsch, Christine
Diener, Hans-Christoph
Dubner, Sergio J.
Halperin, Jonathan L.
Ma, Chang-Sheng
Rothman, Kenneth J.
Marler, Sabrina
Gurusamy, Venkatesh Kumar
Huisman, Menno V.
author_sort Lip, Gregory Y. H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prospectively collected data comparing the safety and effectiveness of individual non-vitamin K antagonists (NOACs) are lacking. Our objective was to directly compare the effectiveness and safety of NOACs in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: In GLORIA-AF, a large, prospective, global registry program, consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AF were followed for 3 years. The comparative analyses for (1) dabigatran vs rivaroxaban or apixaban and (2) rivaroxaban vs apixaban were performed on propensity score (PS)-matched patient sets. Proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for outcomes of interest. RESULTS: The GLORIA-AF Phase III registry enrolled 21,300 patients between January 2014 and December 2016. Of these, 3839 were prescribed dabigatran, 4015 rivaroxaban and 4505 apixaban, with median ages of 71.0, 71.0, and 73.0 years, respectively. In the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dabigatran vs rivaroxaban were, for stroke: 1.27 (0.79–2.03), major bleeding 0.59 (0.40–0.88), myocardial infarction 0.68 (0.40–1.16), and all-cause death 0.86 (0.67–1.10). For the comparison of dabigatran vs apixaban, in the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs were, for stroke 1.16 (0.76–1.78), myocardial infarction 0.84 (0.48–1.46), major bleeding 0.98 (0.63–1.52) and all-cause death 1.01 (0.79–1.29). For the comparison of rivaroxaban vs apixaban, in the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs were, for stroke 0.78 (0.52–1.19), myocardial infarction 0.96 (0.63–1.45), major bleeding 1.54 (1.14–2.08), and all-cause death 0.97 (0.80–1.19). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with dabigatran had a 41% lower risk of major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban, but similar risks of stroke, MI, and death. Relative to apixaban, patients treated with dabigatran had similar risks of stroke, major bleeding, MI, and death. Rivaroxaban relative to apixaban had increased risk for major bleeding, but similar risks for stroke, MI, and death. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01468701, NCT01671007. Date of registration: September 2013. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-022-01996-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9054878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90548782022-05-07 Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: GLORIA-AF Registry Lip, Gregory Y. H. Kotalczyk, Agnieszka Teutsch, Christine Diener, Hans-Christoph Dubner, Sergio J. Halperin, Jonathan L. Ma, Chang-Sheng Rothman, Kenneth J. Marler, Sabrina Gurusamy, Venkatesh Kumar Huisman, Menno V. Clin Res Cardiol Original Paper BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prospectively collected data comparing the safety and effectiveness of individual non-vitamin K antagonists (NOACs) are lacking. Our objective was to directly compare the effectiveness and safety of NOACs in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: In GLORIA-AF, a large, prospective, global registry program, consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AF were followed for 3 years. The comparative analyses for (1) dabigatran vs rivaroxaban or apixaban and (2) rivaroxaban vs apixaban were performed on propensity score (PS)-matched patient sets. Proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for outcomes of interest. RESULTS: The GLORIA-AF Phase III registry enrolled 21,300 patients between January 2014 and December 2016. Of these, 3839 were prescribed dabigatran, 4015 rivaroxaban and 4505 apixaban, with median ages of 71.0, 71.0, and 73.0 years, respectively. In the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dabigatran vs rivaroxaban were, for stroke: 1.27 (0.79–2.03), major bleeding 0.59 (0.40–0.88), myocardial infarction 0.68 (0.40–1.16), and all-cause death 0.86 (0.67–1.10). For the comparison of dabigatran vs apixaban, in the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs were, for stroke 1.16 (0.76–1.78), myocardial infarction 0.84 (0.48–1.46), major bleeding 0.98 (0.63–1.52) and all-cause death 1.01 (0.79–1.29). For the comparison of rivaroxaban vs apixaban, in the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs were, for stroke 0.78 (0.52–1.19), myocardial infarction 0.96 (0.63–1.45), major bleeding 1.54 (1.14–2.08), and all-cause death 0.97 (0.80–1.19). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with dabigatran had a 41% lower risk of major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban, but similar risks of stroke, MI, and death. Relative to apixaban, patients treated with dabigatran had similar risks of stroke, major bleeding, MI, and death. Rivaroxaban relative to apixaban had increased risk for major bleeding, but similar risks for stroke, MI, and death. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01468701, NCT01671007. Date of registration: September 2013. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-022-01996-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-03-16 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9054878/ /pubmed/35294625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-01996-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Lip, Gregory Y. H.
Kotalczyk, Agnieszka
Teutsch, Christine
Diener, Hans-Christoph
Dubner, Sergio J.
Halperin, Jonathan L.
Ma, Chang-Sheng
Rothman, Kenneth J.
Marler, Sabrina
Gurusamy, Venkatesh Kumar
Huisman, Menno V.
Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: GLORIA-AF Registry
title Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: GLORIA-AF Registry
title_full Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: GLORIA-AF Registry
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: GLORIA-AF Registry
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: GLORIA-AF Registry
title_short Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: GLORIA-AF Registry
title_sort comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin k antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: gloria-af registry
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9054878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35294625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-01996-2
work_keys_str_mv AT lipgregoryyh comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnonvitaminkantagonistsforatrialfibrillationinclinicalpracticegloriaafregistry
AT kotalczykagnieszka comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnonvitaminkantagonistsforatrialfibrillationinclinicalpracticegloriaafregistry
AT teutschchristine comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnonvitaminkantagonistsforatrialfibrillationinclinicalpracticegloriaafregistry
AT dienerhanschristoph comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnonvitaminkantagonistsforatrialfibrillationinclinicalpracticegloriaafregistry
AT dubnersergioj comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnonvitaminkantagonistsforatrialfibrillationinclinicalpracticegloriaafregistry
AT halperinjonathanl comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnonvitaminkantagonistsforatrialfibrillationinclinicalpracticegloriaafregistry
AT machangsheng comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnonvitaminkantagonistsforatrialfibrillationinclinicalpracticegloriaafregistry
AT rothmankennethj comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnonvitaminkantagonistsforatrialfibrillationinclinicalpracticegloriaafregistry
AT marlersabrina comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnonvitaminkantagonistsforatrialfibrillationinclinicalpracticegloriaafregistry
AT gurusamyvenkateshkumar comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnonvitaminkantagonistsforatrialfibrillationinclinicalpracticegloriaafregistry
AT huismanmennov comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnonvitaminkantagonistsforatrialfibrillationinclinicalpracticegloriaafregistry
AT comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofnonvitaminkantagonistsforatrialfibrillationinclinicalpracticegloriaafregistry