Cargando…
The Level of Anatomical Knowledge, Hard to Establish: a Systematic Narrative Review
OBJECTIVE: This literature review aimed to gain more insight into the level of anatomical knowledge based on published measurements among medical students, residents, fellows, and specialists. METHODS: We performed an extensive literature search in three online databases: Medline (using PubMed), Web...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9054958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35528299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01509-w |
_version_ | 1784697305206620160 |
---|---|
author | Koppes, Dorothea Maria Triepels, Charlotte Petronella Robertus Notten, Kim Josephina Bernadette Smeets, Carlijn Franscisca Anna Kruitwagen, Rutgerus Franciscus Petrus Maria Van Gorp, Toon Scheele, Fedde Van Kuijk, Sander Martijn Job |
author_facet | Koppes, Dorothea Maria Triepels, Charlotte Petronella Robertus Notten, Kim Josephina Bernadette Smeets, Carlijn Franscisca Anna Kruitwagen, Rutgerus Franciscus Petrus Maria Van Gorp, Toon Scheele, Fedde Van Kuijk, Sander Martijn Job |
author_sort | Koppes, Dorothea Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This literature review aimed to gain more insight into the level of anatomical knowledge based on published measurements among medical students, residents, fellows, and specialists. METHODS: We performed an extensive literature search in three online databases: Medline (using PubMed), Web of Science, and Education Resources Information Centre (ERIC). RESULTS: A total of 30 relevant studies were found. In these studies, participants took different anatomy tests, and their mean/median scaled scores range from 22.5 to 82.4% on a 0 to 100% scale. CONCLUSION: This review provides an overview of what is known about measured anatomical knowledge. After critically reviewing the literature, we have to conclude that the existing literature confirms that anatomical knowledge is hard to establish, mainly due to the lack of standardisation. Further research should focus on ways to define and assess ‘desired anatomical knowledge’ in different contexts. In a next phase, we can discuss if anatomical knowledge is lacking and if interventions are needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9054958 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90549582022-05-07 The Level of Anatomical Knowledge, Hard to Establish: a Systematic Narrative Review Koppes, Dorothea Maria Triepels, Charlotte Petronella Robertus Notten, Kim Josephina Bernadette Smeets, Carlijn Franscisca Anna Kruitwagen, Rutgerus Franciscus Petrus Maria Van Gorp, Toon Scheele, Fedde Van Kuijk, Sander Martijn Job Med Sci Educ Review OBJECTIVE: This literature review aimed to gain more insight into the level of anatomical knowledge based on published measurements among medical students, residents, fellows, and specialists. METHODS: We performed an extensive literature search in three online databases: Medline (using PubMed), Web of Science, and Education Resources Information Centre (ERIC). RESULTS: A total of 30 relevant studies were found. In these studies, participants took different anatomy tests, and their mean/median scaled scores range from 22.5 to 82.4% on a 0 to 100% scale. CONCLUSION: This review provides an overview of what is known about measured anatomical knowledge. After critically reviewing the literature, we have to conclude that the existing literature confirms that anatomical knowledge is hard to establish, mainly due to the lack of standardisation. Further research should focus on ways to define and assess ‘desired anatomical knowledge’ in different contexts. In a next phase, we can discuss if anatomical knowledge is lacking and if interventions are needed. Springer US 2022-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9054958/ /pubmed/35528299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01509-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Koppes, Dorothea Maria Triepels, Charlotte Petronella Robertus Notten, Kim Josephina Bernadette Smeets, Carlijn Franscisca Anna Kruitwagen, Rutgerus Franciscus Petrus Maria Van Gorp, Toon Scheele, Fedde Van Kuijk, Sander Martijn Job The Level of Anatomical Knowledge, Hard to Establish: a Systematic Narrative Review |
title | The Level of Anatomical Knowledge, Hard to Establish: a Systematic Narrative Review |
title_full | The Level of Anatomical Knowledge, Hard to Establish: a Systematic Narrative Review |
title_fullStr | The Level of Anatomical Knowledge, Hard to Establish: a Systematic Narrative Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Level of Anatomical Knowledge, Hard to Establish: a Systematic Narrative Review |
title_short | The Level of Anatomical Knowledge, Hard to Establish: a Systematic Narrative Review |
title_sort | level of anatomical knowledge, hard to establish: a systematic narrative review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9054958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35528299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01509-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koppesdorotheamaria thelevelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview AT triepelscharlottepetronellarobertus thelevelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview AT nottenkimjosephinabernadette thelevelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview AT smeetscarlijnfransciscaanna thelevelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview AT kruitwagenrutgerusfranciscuspetrusmaria thelevelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview AT vangorptoon thelevelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview AT scheelefedde thelevelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview AT vankuijksandermartijnjob thelevelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview AT koppesdorotheamaria levelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview AT triepelscharlottepetronellarobertus levelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview AT nottenkimjosephinabernadette levelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview AT smeetscarlijnfransciscaanna levelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview AT kruitwagenrutgerusfranciscuspetrusmaria levelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview AT vangorptoon levelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview AT scheelefedde levelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview AT vankuijksandermartijnjob levelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview |