Cargando…

The Level of Anatomical Knowledge, Hard to Establish: a Systematic Narrative Review

OBJECTIVE: This literature review aimed to gain more insight into the level of anatomical knowledge based on published measurements among medical students, residents, fellows, and specialists. METHODS: We performed an extensive literature search in three online databases: Medline (using PubMed), Web...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koppes, Dorothea Maria, Triepels, Charlotte Petronella Robertus, Notten, Kim Josephina Bernadette, Smeets, Carlijn Franscisca Anna, Kruitwagen, Rutgerus Franciscus Petrus Maria, Van Gorp, Toon, Scheele, Fedde, Van Kuijk, Sander Martijn Job
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9054958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35528299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01509-w
_version_ 1784697305206620160
author Koppes, Dorothea Maria
Triepels, Charlotte Petronella Robertus
Notten, Kim Josephina Bernadette
Smeets, Carlijn Franscisca Anna
Kruitwagen, Rutgerus Franciscus Petrus Maria
Van Gorp, Toon
Scheele, Fedde
Van Kuijk, Sander Martijn Job
author_facet Koppes, Dorothea Maria
Triepels, Charlotte Petronella Robertus
Notten, Kim Josephina Bernadette
Smeets, Carlijn Franscisca Anna
Kruitwagen, Rutgerus Franciscus Petrus Maria
Van Gorp, Toon
Scheele, Fedde
Van Kuijk, Sander Martijn Job
author_sort Koppes, Dorothea Maria
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This literature review aimed to gain more insight into the level of anatomical knowledge based on published measurements among medical students, residents, fellows, and specialists. METHODS: We performed an extensive literature search in three online databases: Medline (using PubMed), Web of Science, and Education Resources Information Centre (ERIC). RESULTS: A total of 30 relevant studies were found. In these studies, participants took different anatomy tests, and their mean/median scaled scores range from 22.5 to 82.4% on a 0 to 100% scale. CONCLUSION: This review provides an overview of what is known about measured anatomical knowledge. After critically reviewing the literature, we have to conclude that the existing literature confirms that anatomical knowledge is hard to establish, mainly due to the lack of standardisation. Further research should focus on ways to define and assess ‘desired anatomical knowledge’ in different contexts. In a next phase, we can discuss if anatomical knowledge is lacking and if interventions are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9054958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90549582022-05-07 The Level of Anatomical Knowledge, Hard to Establish: a Systematic Narrative Review Koppes, Dorothea Maria Triepels, Charlotte Petronella Robertus Notten, Kim Josephina Bernadette Smeets, Carlijn Franscisca Anna Kruitwagen, Rutgerus Franciscus Petrus Maria Van Gorp, Toon Scheele, Fedde Van Kuijk, Sander Martijn Job Med Sci Educ Review OBJECTIVE: This literature review aimed to gain more insight into the level of anatomical knowledge based on published measurements among medical students, residents, fellows, and specialists. METHODS: We performed an extensive literature search in three online databases: Medline (using PubMed), Web of Science, and Education Resources Information Centre (ERIC). RESULTS: A total of 30 relevant studies were found. In these studies, participants took different anatomy tests, and their mean/median scaled scores range from 22.5 to 82.4% on a 0 to 100% scale. CONCLUSION: This review provides an overview of what is known about measured anatomical knowledge. After critically reviewing the literature, we have to conclude that the existing literature confirms that anatomical knowledge is hard to establish, mainly due to the lack of standardisation. Further research should focus on ways to define and assess ‘desired anatomical knowledge’ in different contexts. In a next phase, we can discuss if anatomical knowledge is lacking and if interventions are needed. Springer US 2022-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9054958/ /pubmed/35528299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01509-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Koppes, Dorothea Maria
Triepels, Charlotte Petronella Robertus
Notten, Kim Josephina Bernadette
Smeets, Carlijn Franscisca Anna
Kruitwagen, Rutgerus Franciscus Petrus Maria
Van Gorp, Toon
Scheele, Fedde
Van Kuijk, Sander Martijn Job
The Level of Anatomical Knowledge, Hard to Establish: a Systematic Narrative Review
title The Level of Anatomical Knowledge, Hard to Establish: a Systematic Narrative Review
title_full The Level of Anatomical Knowledge, Hard to Establish: a Systematic Narrative Review
title_fullStr The Level of Anatomical Knowledge, Hard to Establish: a Systematic Narrative Review
title_full_unstemmed The Level of Anatomical Knowledge, Hard to Establish: a Systematic Narrative Review
title_short The Level of Anatomical Knowledge, Hard to Establish: a Systematic Narrative Review
title_sort level of anatomical knowledge, hard to establish: a systematic narrative review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9054958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35528299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01509-w
work_keys_str_mv AT koppesdorotheamaria thelevelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview
AT triepelscharlottepetronellarobertus thelevelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview
AT nottenkimjosephinabernadette thelevelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview
AT smeetscarlijnfransciscaanna thelevelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview
AT kruitwagenrutgerusfranciscuspetrusmaria thelevelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview
AT vangorptoon thelevelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview
AT scheelefedde thelevelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview
AT vankuijksandermartijnjob thelevelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview
AT koppesdorotheamaria levelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview
AT triepelscharlottepetronellarobertus levelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview
AT nottenkimjosephinabernadette levelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview
AT smeetscarlijnfransciscaanna levelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview
AT kruitwagenrutgerusfranciscuspetrusmaria levelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview
AT vangorptoon levelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview
AT scheelefedde levelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview
AT vankuijksandermartijnjob levelofanatomicalknowledgehardtoestablishasystematicnarrativereview