Cargando…
Expert perspectives on the introduction of Triple Artemisinin-based Combination Therapies (TACTs) in Southeast Asia: a Delphi study
BACKGROUND: Triple Artemisinin-based Combination Therapies (TACTs) are being developed as a response to artemisinin and partner drug resistance in Southeast Asia. However, the desirability, timing and practical feasibility of introducing TACTs in Southeast Asia is subject to debate. This study syste...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9055751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35490212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13212-x |
_version_ | 1784697483302010880 |
---|---|
author | de Haan, Freek Boon, Wouter P. C. Amaratunga, Chanaki Dondorp, Arjen M. |
author_facet | de Haan, Freek Boon, Wouter P. C. Amaratunga, Chanaki Dondorp, Arjen M. |
author_sort | de Haan, Freek |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Triple Artemisinin-based Combination Therapies (TACTs) are being developed as a response to artemisinin and partner drug resistance in Southeast Asia. However, the desirability, timing and practical feasibility of introducing TACTs in Southeast Asia is subject to debate. This study systematically assesses perspectives of malaria experts towards the introduction of TACTs as first-line treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Southeast Asia. METHODS: A two-round Delphi study was conducted. In the first round, 53 malaria experts answered open-ended questions on what they consider the most important advantages, disadvantages, and implementation barriers for introducing TACTs in Southeast Asia. In the second round, the expert panel rated the relevance of each statement on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Malaria experts identified 15 advantages, 15 disadvantages and 13 implementation barriers for introducing TACTs in Southeast Asia in the first round of data collection. In the second round, consensus was reached on 13 advantages (8 perceived as relevant, 5 as not-relevant), 12 disadvantages (10 relevant, 2 not-relevant), and 13 implementation barriers (all relevant). Advantages attributed highest relevance related to the clinical and epidemiological rationale of introducing TACTs. Disadvantages attributed highest relevance related to increased side-effects, unavailability of fixed-dose TACTs, and potential cost increases. Implementation barriers attributed highest relevance related to obtaining timely regulatory approval, timely availability of fixed-dose TACTs, and generating global policy support for introducing TACTs. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides a structured oversight of malaria experts’ perceptions on the major advantages, disadvantages and implementation challenges for introducing TACTs in Southeast Asia, over current practices of rotating ACTs when treatment failure is observed. The findings can benefit strategic decision making in the battle against drug-resistant malaria. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13212-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9055751 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90557512022-05-01 Expert perspectives on the introduction of Triple Artemisinin-based Combination Therapies (TACTs) in Southeast Asia: a Delphi study de Haan, Freek Boon, Wouter P. C. Amaratunga, Chanaki Dondorp, Arjen M. BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Triple Artemisinin-based Combination Therapies (TACTs) are being developed as a response to artemisinin and partner drug resistance in Southeast Asia. However, the desirability, timing and practical feasibility of introducing TACTs in Southeast Asia is subject to debate. This study systematically assesses perspectives of malaria experts towards the introduction of TACTs as first-line treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Southeast Asia. METHODS: A two-round Delphi study was conducted. In the first round, 53 malaria experts answered open-ended questions on what they consider the most important advantages, disadvantages, and implementation barriers for introducing TACTs in Southeast Asia. In the second round, the expert panel rated the relevance of each statement on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Malaria experts identified 15 advantages, 15 disadvantages and 13 implementation barriers for introducing TACTs in Southeast Asia in the first round of data collection. In the second round, consensus was reached on 13 advantages (8 perceived as relevant, 5 as not-relevant), 12 disadvantages (10 relevant, 2 not-relevant), and 13 implementation barriers (all relevant). Advantages attributed highest relevance related to the clinical and epidemiological rationale of introducing TACTs. Disadvantages attributed highest relevance related to increased side-effects, unavailability of fixed-dose TACTs, and potential cost increases. Implementation barriers attributed highest relevance related to obtaining timely regulatory approval, timely availability of fixed-dose TACTs, and generating global policy support for introducing TACTs. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides a structured oversight of malaria experts’ perceptions on the major advantages, disadvantages and implementation challenges for introducing TACTs in Southeast Asia, over current practices of rotating ACTs when treatment failure is observed. The findings can benefit strategic decision making in the battle against drug-resistant malaria. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13212-x. BioMed Central 2022-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9055751/ /pubmed/35490212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13212-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research de Haan, Freek Boon, Wouter P. C. Amaratunga, Chanaki Dondorp, Arjen M. Expert perspectives on the introduction of Triple Artemisinin-based Combination Therapies (TACTs) in Southeast Asia: a Delphi study |
title | Expert perspectives on the introduction of Triple Artemisinin-based Combination Therapies (TACTs) in Southeast Asia: a Delphi study |
title_full | Expert perspectives on the introduction of Triple Artemisinin-based Combination Therapies (TACTs) in Southeast Asia: a Delphi study |
title_fullStr | Expert perspectives on the introduction of Triple Artemisinin-based Combination Therapies (TACTs) in Southeast Asia: a Delphi study |
title_full_unstemmed | Expert perspectives on the introduction of Triple Artemisinin-based Combination Therapies (TACTs) in Southeast Asia: a Delphi study |
title_short | Expert perspectives on the introduction of Triple Artemisinin-based Combination Therapies (TACTs) in Southeast Asia: a Delphi study |
title_sort | expert perspectives on the introduction of triple artemisinin-based combination therapies (tacts) in southeast asia: a delphi study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9055751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35490212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13212-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dehaanfreek expertperspectivesontheintroductionoftripleartemisininbasedcombinationtherapiestactsinsoutheastasiaadelphistudy AT boonwouterpc expertperspectivesontheintroductionoftripleartemisininbasedcombinationtherapiestactsinsoutheastasiaadelphistudy AT amaratungachanaki expertperspectivesontheintroductionoftripleartemisininbasedcombinationtherapiestactsinsoutheastasiaadelphistudy AT dondorparjenm expertperspectivesontheintroductionoftripleartemisininbasedcombinationtherapiestactsinsoutheastasiaadelphistudy |