Cargando…

Comparison of (18) F-NaF Imaging, (99m) Tc-MDP Scintigraphy, and (18) F-FDG for Detecting Bone Metastases

Bone is a common metastasis site in several malignancies, most importantly prostate and breast cancers. Given the significance of the early and accurate diagnosis of bone metastases for preliminary staging, treatment planning and monitoring, restaging, and survival prediction in patients with malign...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dadgar, Habibollah, Norouzbeigi, Nasim, Jokar, Narges, Zareizadeh, Jafar, Gholamrezanezhad, Ali, Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat, Abbaszadeh, Moloud, Assadi, Majid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9056122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35502272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1748154
_version_ 1784697563267465216
author Dadgar, Habibollah
Norouzbeigi, Nasim
Jokar, Narges
Zareizadeh, Jafar
Gholamrezanezhad, Ali
Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat
Abbaszadeh, Moloud
Assadi, Majid
author_facet Dadgar, Habibollah
Norouzbeigi, Nasim
Jokar, Narges
Zareizadeh, Jafar
Gholamrezanezhad, Ali
Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat
Abbaszadeh, Moloud
Assadi, Majid
author_sort Dadgar, Habibollah
collection PubMed
description Bone is a common metastasis site in several malignancies, most importantly prostate and breast cancers. Given the significance of the early and accurate diagnosis of bone metastases for preliminary staging, treatment planning and monitoring, restaging, and survival prediction in patients with malignancy, it is critical to compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of imaging modalities. Although technetium-99m-labeled diphosphonates [ (99m) Tc-MDP] scintigraphy has been used for assessing skeletal involvement, there is a renewed interest in fluorine-18-labeled sodium fluoride [ (18) F-NaF] bone imaging with positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography, since this approach provides essential advantages in bone metastases evaluation. This review study aimed to discuss the basic and technical aspects of (18) F-NaF imaging and its mechanism of action, and compare this modality with the (99m) Tc-MDP bone scan and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose using current evidence from the pertinent literature and case examples of the center in the study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9056122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90561222022-05-01 Comparison of (18) F-NaF Imaging, (99m) Tc-MDP Scintigraphy, and (18) F-FDG for Detecting Bone Metastases Dadgar, Habibollah Norouzbeigi, Nasim Jokar, Narges Zareizadeh, Jafar Gholamrezanezhad, Ali Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat Abbaszadeh, Moloud Assadi, Majid World J Nucl Med Bone is a common metastasis site in several malignancies, most importantly prostate and breast cancers. Given the significance of the early and accurate diagnosis of bone metastases for preliminary staging, treatment planning and monitoring, restaging, and survival prediction in patients with malignancy, it is critical to compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of imaging modalities. Although technetium-99m-labeled diphosphonates [ (99m) Tc-MDP] scintigraphy has been used for assessing skeletal involvement, there is a renewed interest in fluorine-18-labeled sodium fluoride [ (18) F-NaF] bone imaging with positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography, since this approach provides essential advantages in bone metastases evaluation. This review study aimed to discuss the basic and technical aspects of (18) F-NaF imaging and its mechanism of action, and compare this modality with the (99m) Tc-MDP bone scan and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose using current evidence from the pertinent literature and case examples of the center in the study. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2022-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9056122/ /pubmed/35502272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1748154 Text en World Association of Radiopharmaceutical and Molecular Therapy (WARMTH). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Dadgar, Habibollah
Norouzbeigi, Nasim
Jokar, Narges
Zareizadeh, Jafar
Gholamrezanezhad, Ali
Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat
Abbaszadeh, Moloud
Assadi, Majid
Comparison of (18) F-NaF Imaging, (99m) Tc-MDP Scintigraphy, and (18) F-FDG for Detecting Bone Metastases
title Comparison of (18) F-NaF Imaging, (99m) Tc-MDP Scintigraphy, and (18) F-FDG for Detecting Bone Metastases
title_full Comparison of (18) F-NaF Imaging, (99m) Tc-MDP Scintigraphy, and (18) F-FDG for Detecting Bone Metastases
title_fullStr Comparison of (18) F-NaF Imaging, (99m) Tc-MDP Scintigraphy, and (18) F-FDG for Detecting Bone Metastases
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of (18) F-NaF Imaging, (99m) Tc-MDP Scintigraphy, and (18) F-FDG for Detecting Bone Metastases
title_short Comparison of (18) F-NaF Imaging, (99m) Tc-MDP Scintigraphy, and (18) F-FDG for Detecting Bone Metastases
title_sort comparison of (18) f-naf imaging, (99m) tc-mdp scintigraphy, and (18) f-fdg for detecting bone metastases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9056122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35502272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1748154
work_keys_str_mv AT dadgarhabibollah comparisonof18fnafimaging99mtcmdpscintigraphyand18ffdgfordetectingbonemetastases
AT norouzbeiginasim comparisonof18fnafimaging99mtcmdpscintigraphyand18ffdgfordetectingbonemetastases
AT jokarnarges comparisonof18fnafimaging99mtcmdpscintigraphyand18ffdgfordetectingbonemetastases
AT zareizadehjafar comparisonof18fnafimaging99mtcmdpscintigraphyand18ffdgfordetectingbonemetastases
AT gholamrezanezhadali comparisonof18fnafimaging99mtcmdpscintigraphyand18ffdgfordetectingbonemetastases
AT ahmadzadehfarhojjat comparisonof18fnafimaging99mtcmdpscintigraphyand18ffdgfordetectingbonemetastases
AT abbaszadehmoloud comparisonof18fnafimaging99mtcmdpscintigraphyand18ffdgfordetectingbonemetastases
AT assadimajid comparisonof18fnafimaging99mtcmdpscintigraphyand18ffdgfordetectingbonemetastases