Cargando…
Comparison of (18) F-NaF Imaging, (99m) Tc-MDP Scintigraphy, and (18) F-FDG for Detecting Bone Metastases
Bone is a common metastasis site in several malignancies, most importantly prostate and breast cancers. Given the significance of the early and accurate diagnosis of bone metastases for preliminary staging, treatment planning and monitoring, restaging, and survival prediction in patients with malign...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9056122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35502272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1748154 |
_version_ | 1784697563267465216 |
---|---|
author | Dadgar, Habibollah Norouzbeigi, Nasim Jokar, Narges Zareizadeh, Jafar Gholamrezanezhad, Ali Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat Abbaszadeh, Moloud Assadi, Majid |
author_facet | Dadgar, Habibollah Norouzbeigi, Nasim Jokar, Narges Zareizadeh, Jafar Gholamrezanezhad, Ali Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat Abbaszadeh, Moloud Assadi, Majid |
author_sort | Dadgar, Habibollah |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bone is a common metastasis site in several malignancies, most importantly prostate and breast cancers. Given the significance of the early and accurate diagnosis of bone metastases for preliminary staging, treatment planning and monitoring, restaging, and survival prediction in patients with malignancy, it is critical to compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of imaging modalities. Although technetium-99m-labeled diphosphonates [ (99m) Tc-MDP] scintigraphy has been used for assessing skeletal involvement, there is a renewed interest in fluorine-18-labeled sodium fluoride [ (18) F-NaF] bone imaging with positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography, since this approach provides essential advantages in bone metastases evaluation. This review study aimed to discuss the basic and technical aspects of (18) F-NaF imaging and its mechanism of action, and compare this modality with the (99m) Tc-MDP bone scan and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose using current evidence from the pertinent literature and case examples of the center in the study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9056122 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90561222022-05-01 Comparison of (18) F-NaF Imaging, (99m) Tc-MDP Scintigraphy, and (18) F-FDG for Detecting Bone Metastases Dadgar, Habibollah Norouzbeigi, Nasim Jokar, Narges Zareizadeh, Jafar Gholamrezanezhad, Ali Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat Abbaszadeh, Moloud Assadi, Majid World J Nucl Med Bone is a common metastasis site in several malignancies, most importantly prostate and breast cancers. Given the significance of the early and accurate diagnosis of bone metastases for preliminary staging, treatment planning and monitoring, restaging, and survival prediction in patients with malignancy, it is critical to compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of imaging modalities. Although technetium-99m-labeled diphosphonates [ (99m) Tc-MDP] scintigraphy has been used for assessing skeletal involvement, there is a renewed interest in fluorine-18-labeled sodium fluoride [ (18) F-NaF] bone imaging with positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography, since this approach provides essential advantages in bone metastases evaluation. This review study aimed to discuss the basic and technical aspects of (18) F-NaF imaging and its mechanism of action, and compare this modality with the (99m) Tc-MDP bone scan and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose using current evidence from the pertinent literature and case examples of the center in the study. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2022-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9056122/ /pubmed/35502272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1748154 Text en World Association of Radiopharmaceutical and Molecular Therapy (WARMTH). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Dadgar, Habibollah Norouzbeigi, Nasim Jokar, Narges Zareizadeh, Jafar Gholamrezanezhad, Ali Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat Abbaszadeh, Moloud Assadi, Majid Comparison of (18) F-NaF Imaging, (99m) Tc-MDP Scintigraphy, and (18) F-FDG for Detecting Bone Metastases |
title |
Comparison of
(18)
F-NaF Imaging,
(99m)
Tc-MDP Scintigraphy, and
(18)
F-FDG for Detecting Bone Metastases
|
title_full |
Comparison of
(18)
F-NaF Imaging,
(99m)
Tc-MDP Scintigraphy, and
(18)
F-FDG for Detecting Bone Metastases
|
title_fullStr |
Comparison of
(18)
F-NaF Imaging,
(99m)
Tc-MDP Scintigraphy, and
(18)
F-FDG for Detecting Bone Metastases
|
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of
(18)
F-NaF Imaging,
(99m)
Tc-MDP Scintigraphy, and
(18)
F-FDG for Detecting Bone Metastases
|
title_short |
Comparison of
(18)
F-NaF Imaging,
(99m)
Tc-MDP Scintigraphy, and
(18)
F-FDG for Detecting Bone Metastases
|
title_sort | comparison of
(18)
f-naf imaging,
(99m)
tc-mdp scintigraphy, and
(18)
f-fdg for detecting bone metastases |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9056122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35502272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1748154 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dadgarhabibollah comparisonof18fnafimaging99mtcmdpscintigraphyand18ffdgfordetectingbonemetastases AT norouzbeiginasim comparisonof18fnafimaging99mtcmdpscintigraphyand18ffdgfordetectingbonemetastases AT jokarnarges comparisonof18fnafimaging99mtcmdpscintigraphyand18ffdgfordetectingbonemetastases AT zareizadehjafar comparisonof18fnafimaging99mtcmdpscintigraphyand18ffdgfordetectingbonemetastases AT gholamrezanezhadali comparisonof18fnafimaging99mtcmdpscintigraphyand18ffdgfordetectingbonemetastases AT ahmadzadehfarhojjat comparisonof18fnafimaging99mtcmdpscintigraphyand18ffdgfordetectingbonemetastases AT abbaszadehmoloud comparisonof18fnafimaging99mtcmdpscintigraphyand18ffdgfordetectingbonemetastases AT assadimajid comparisonof18fnafimaging99mtcmdpscintigraphyand18ffdgfordetectingbonemetastases |