Cargando…

Doctor Retention: A Cross-sectional Study of How Ireland Has Been Losing the Battle

Background: The failure of some high-income countries to retain their medical graduates is one driver of doctor immigration from low- and middle-income countries. Ireland, which attracts many international medical graduates, implemented a doctor retention strategy from early 2015. This study measure...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brugha, Ruairi, Clarke, Nicholas, Hendrick, Louise, Sweeney, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9056149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32610753
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.54
_version_ 1784697570099986432
author Brugha, Ruairi
Clarke, Nicholas
Hendrick, Louise
Sweeney, James
author_facet Brugha, Ruairi
Clarke, Nicholas
Hendrick, Louise
Sweeney, James
author_sort Brugha, Ruairi
collection PubMed
description Background: The failure of some high-income countries to retain their medical graduates is one driver of doctor immigration from low- and middle-income countries. Ireland, which attracts many international medical graduates, implemented a doctor retention strategy from early 2015. This study measures junior doctors’ migration intentions, the reasons they leave and likelihood of them returning. The aim is to identify the characteristics and patterns of doctors who plan to emigrate to inform targeted measures to retain these doctors. Methods: A national sample of 1148 junior hospital doctors completed an online survey in early 2018, eliciting their experiences of training and working conditions. Respondents were asked to choose between the following career options: remain in Ireland, go and return, go and stay away, or quit medicine. Bivariate analyses and a two-stage multivariable analysis were used to model the factors associated with these outcomes. Results: 45% of respondents planned to remain in Ireland, 35% leave but return later, 17% leave and not return; and 3% to quit medicine. An intention to go abroad versus remain in Ireland was independently associated (P <.05) with the doctor being under 30 years (odds ratio [OR]=1.09 per year under 30), a non-European Union (EU) national (OR=1.54), a trainee (OR=1.50), and with hospital specialization, especially in Anesthesiology (OR=5.09). Respondents were more likely to remain if they had experienced improvements in supervision and training costs. Intention to go abroad and not return versus go and return was independently associated (P <.05) with: age over 30 years (OR=1.16 per year over 30); being a non-EU (OR=9.85) or non-Irish EU (OR=3.42) national; having trained through a graduate entry pathway (OR=2.17), specializing in Psychiatry (OR=4.76) and reporting that mentoring had become worse (OR=5.85). Conclusion: Ireland’s doctor retention strategy has not addressed the root causes of poor training and working experiences in Irish hospitals. It needs a more diversified retention strategy that addresses under-staffing, facilitates circular migration by younger trainees who choose to train abroad, identifies and addresses specialty-specific factors, and builds mentoring linkages between trainees and senior specialists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9056149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90561492022-05-04 Doctor Retention: A Cross-sectional Study of How Ireland Has Been Losing the Battle Brugha, Ruairi Clarke, Nicholas Hendrick, Louise Sweeney, James Int J Health Policy Manag Original Article Background: The failure of some high-income countries to retain their medical graduates is one driver of doctor immigration from low- and middle-income countries. Ireland, which attracts many international medical graduates, implemented a doctor retention strategy from early 2015. This study measures junior doctors’ migration intentions, the reasons they leave and likelihood of them returning. The aim is to identify the characteristics and patterns of doctors who plan to emigrate to inform targeted measures to retain these doctors. Methods: A national sample of 1148 junior hospital doctors completed an online survey in early 2018, eliciting their experiences of training and working conditions. Respondents were asked to choose between the following career options: remain in Ireland, go and return, go and stay away, or quit medicine. Bivariate analyses and a two-stage multivariable analysis were used to model the factors associated with these outcomes. Results: 45% of respondents planned to remain in Ireland, 35% leave but return later, 17% leave and not return; and 3% to quit medicine. An intention to go abroad versus remain in Ireland was independently associated (P <.05) with the doctor being under 30 years (odds ratio [OR]=1.09 per year under 30), a non-European Union (EU) national (OR=1.54), a trainee (OR=1.50), and with hospital specialization, especially in Anesthesiology (OR=5.09). Respondents were more likely to remain if they had experienced improvements in supervision and training costs. Intention to go abroad and not return versus go and return was independently associated (P <.05) with: age over 30 years (OR=1.16 per year over 30); being a non-EU (OR=9.85) or non-Irish EU (OR=3.42) national; having trained through a graduate entry pathway (OR=2.17), specializing in Psychiatry (OR=4.76) and reporting that mentoring had become worse (OR=5.85). Conclusion: Ireland’s doctor retention strategy has not addressed the root causes of poor training and working experiences in Irish hospitals. It needs a more diversified retention strategy that addresses under-staffing, facilitates circular migration by younger trainees who choose to train abroad, identifies and addresses specialty-specific factors, and builds mentoring linkages between trainees and senior specialists. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2020-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9056149/ /pubmed/32610753 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.54 Text en © 2021 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Brugha, Ruairi
Clarke, Nicholas
Hendrick, Louise
Sweeney, James
Doctor Retention: A Cross-sectional Study of How Ireland Has Been Losing the Battle
title Doctor Retention: A Cross-sectional Study of How Ireland Has Been Losing the Battle
title_full Doctor Retention: A Cross-sectional Study of How Ireland Has Been Losing the Battle
title_fullStr Doctor Retention: A Cross-sectional Study of How Ireland Has Been Losing the Battle
title_full_unstemmed Doctor Retention: A Cross-sectional Study of How Ireland Has Been Losing the Battle
title_short Doctor Retention: A Cross-sectional Study of How Ireland Has Been Losing the Battle
title_sort doctor retention: a cross-sectional study of how ireland has been losing the battle
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9056149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32610753
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.54
work_keys_str_mv AT brugharuairi doctorretentionacrosssectionalstudyofhowirelandhasbeenlosingthebattle
AT clarkenicholas doctorretentionacrosssectionalstudyofhowirelandhasbeenlosingthebattle
AT hendricklouise doctorretentionacrosssectionalstudyofhowirelandhasbeenlosingthebattle
AT sweeneyjames doctorretentionacrosssectionalstudyofhowirelandhasbeenlosingthebattle