Cargando…

PECARN Rule in diagnostic process of pediatric patients with minor head trauma in emergency department

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the PECARN Rule (PR) in reducing radiological investigations in children with mild traumatic head injury in comparison with current clinical practice. A retrospective study was performed in our hospital between July 2015 and June 2020. Data of all children...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gambacorta, Alessandro, Moro, Marianna, Curatola, Antonietta, Brancato, Federica, Covino, Marcello, Chiaretti, Antonio, Gatto, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9056473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35194653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04424-9
_version_ 1784697670887014400
author Gambacorta, Alessandro
Moro, Marianna
Curatola, Antonietta
Brancato, Federica
Covino, Marcello
Chiaretti, Antonio
Gatto, Antonio
author_facet Gambacorta, Alessandro
Moro, Marianna
Curatola, Antonietta
Brancato, Federica
Covino, Marcello
Chiaretti, Antonio
Gatto, Antonio
author_sort Gambacorta, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the PECARN Rule (PR) in reducing radiological investigations in children with mild traumatic head injury in comparison with current clinical practice. A retrospective study was performed in our hospital between July 2015 and June 2020. Data of all children < 18 years of age admitted to the emergency department (ED), within 24 h after a head trauma with GCS ≥ 14, were analyzed. PECARN Rule was retrospectively applied to all patients. In total, 3832 patients were enrolled, 2613 patients ≥ 2 years and 1219 < 2 years. In the group of children ≥ 2 years, 10 presented clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI) and were hospitalized, 7/10 underwent neurosurgery, and 3/10 clinical observation in the pediatric ward for more than 48 h. In children < 2 years, only 3 patients presented ciTBI, 2 underwent neurosurgery and 1 hospitalized. Applying the PR, no patient with ciTBI would have been discharged without an accurate diagnosis and we would have avoided 139 CT scans in patients ≥ 2 years, and 23 in those < 2 years of age (29% less). Conclusion: We demonstrated the safety and validity of the PR in our setting with 100% sensitivity in both age groups in identifying patients with ciTBI and theoretically in reducing performed CT scans by 29%. Therefore, in patients classified in the low-risk category, it is a duty not to expose the child to ionizing radiation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00431-022-04424-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9056473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90564732022-05-07 PECARN Rule in diagnostic process of pediatric patients with minor head trauma in emergency department Gambacorta, Alessandro Moro, Marianna Curatola, Antonietta Brancato, Federica Covino, Marcello Chiaretti, Antonio Gatto, Antonio Eur J Pediatr Original Article This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the PECARN Rule (PR) in reducing radiological investigations in children with mild traumatic head injury in comparison with current clinical practice. A retrospective study was performed in our hospital between July 2015 and June 2020. Data of all children < 18 years of age admitted to the emergency department (ED), within 24 h after a head trauma with GCS ≥ 14, were analyzed. PECARN Rule was retrospectively applied to all patients. In total, 3832 patients were enrolled, 2613 patients ≥ 2 years and 1219 < 2 years. In the group of children ≥ 2 years, 10 presented clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI) and were hospitalized, 7/10 underwent neurosurgery, and 3/10 clinical observation in the pediatric ward for more than 48 h. In children < 2 years, only 3 patients presented ciTBI, 2 underwent neurosurgery and 1 hospitalized. Applying the PR, no patient with ciTBI would have been discharged without an accurate diagnosis and we would have avoided 139 CT scans in patients ≥ 2 years, and 23 in those < 2 years of age (29% less). Conclusion: We demonstrated the safety and validity of the PR in our setting with 100% sensitivity in both age groups in identifying patients with ciTBI and theoretically in reducing performed CT scans by 29%. Therefore, in patients classified in the low-risk category, it is a duty not to expose the child to ionizing radiation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00431-022-04424-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-02-22 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9056473/ /pubmed/35194653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04424-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Gambacorta, Alessandro
Moro, Marianna
Curatola, Antonietta
Brancato, Federica
Covino, Marcello
Chiaretti, Antonio
Gatto, Antonio
PECARN Rule in diagnostic process of pediatric patients with minor head trauma in emergency department
title PECARN Rule in diagnostic process of pediatric patients with minor head trauma in emergency department
title_full PECARN Rule in diagnostic process of pediatric patients with minor head trauma in emergency department
title_fullStr PECARN Rule in diagnostic process of pediatric patients with minor head trauma in emergency department
title_full_unstemmed PECARN Rule in diagnostic process of pediatric patients with minor head trauma in emergency department
title_short PECARN Rule in diagnostic process of pediatric patients with minor head trauma in emergency department
title_sort pecarn rule in diagnostic process of pediatric patients with minor head trauma in emergency department
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9056473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35194653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04424-9
work_keys_str_mv AT gambacortaalessandro pecarnruleindiagnosticprocessofpediatricpatientswithminorheadtraumainemergencydepartment
AT moromarianna pecarnruleindiagnosticprocessofpediatricpatientswithminorheadtraumainemergencydepartment
AT curatolaantonietta pecarnruleindiagnosticprocessofpediatricpatientswithminorheadtraumainemergencydepartment
AT brancatofederica pecarnruleindiagnosticprocessofpediatricpatientswithminorheadtraumainemergencydepartment
AT covinomarcello pecarnruleindiagnosticprocessofpediatricpatientswithminorheadtraumainemergencydepartment
AT chiarettiantonio pecarnruleindiagnosticprocessofpediatricpatientswithminorheadtraumainemergencydepartment
AT gattoantonio pecarnruleindiagnosticprocessofpediatricpatientswithminorheadtraumainemergencydepartment