Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Omidenepag Isopropyl 0.002% Ophthalmic Solution: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data in Japan

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of omidenepag isopropyl (OMDI) in a retrospective, real-world, multicenter setting. METHODS: A retrospective medical chart review of patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension receiving OMDI from November 2018 to November 2019 wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miki, Atsuya, Miyamoto, Etsuyo, Ishida, Naruhiro, Shii, Daisuke, Hori, Kiyotaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9056475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35287233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-022-02069-6
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of omidenepag isopropyl (OMDI) in a retrospective, real-world, multicenter setting. METHODS: A retrospective medical chart review of patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension receiving OMDI from November 2018 to November 2019 with at least 12 weeks of follow-up was conducted in 11 eye clinics in Japan. The participants were categorized into three therapy groups, designated the naïve monotherapy, switching monotherapy, and concomitant therapy groups. The main outcome measures were the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) at week 4 and week 12 after the initiation of OMDI treatment, and frequency of adverse drug reactions. RESULTS: Data were collected from 827 patients. The baseline IOP in the naïve group was 16.6 ± 4.2 mmHg. The mean IOP reduction at week 4 and week 12 was − 2.9 ± 3.2 mmHg (P < 0.0001) and − 2.5 ± 2.9 mmHg (P < 0.0001), respectively. Eyes with baseline IOP less than 16 mmHg also showed a significant reduction of IOP of − 1.4 ± 2.0 mmHg at week 12. OMDI significantly reduced IOP not only in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma but also in eyes with primary angle-closure glaucoma and secondary glaucoma. In the switching monotherapy group, IOP did not change significantly after switching from most classes of medications to OMDI, but further IOP reduction was observed in the case of switching from beta-blockers to OMDI. The frequency of adverse drug reactions was 14.1% in all participants, and the most common adverse reaction was ocular hyperemia (7.6%). No serious and severe side effects were observed in this study. CONCLUSION: OMDI showed an IOP-lowering effect in eyes with various types of glaucoma and using various therapeutic regimens in real-world clinical practice. In addition, OMDI did not show any serious and severe side effects, suggesting the potential of OMDI as a first-line medicine for the treatment of glaucoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN): 000040040. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-022-02069-6.