Cargando…

How does the Li-distribution in the 16d sites determine the stability of A(3)(Li,Ti(5))O(12) (A = Li and Na)?

Li(3)(Li,Ti(5))O(12) (LTO) is a stable and safe negative electrode material for Li-ion batteries, and its Na substitute Na(3)(Li,Ti(5))O(12) (NTO) is a counterpart for the Na-ion battery. In LTO and NTO, a sixth of the Ti-sites (16d) in the spinel framework are replaced by Li: Li mixing in the 16d s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tada, Kohei, Ozaki, Hiroyuki, Kiyobayashi, Tetsu, Kitta, Mitsunori, Tanaka, Shingo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9056721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35515046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ra06125e
_version_ 1784697728017629184
author Tada, Kohei
Ozaki, Hiroyuki
Kiyobayashi, Tetsu
Kitta, Mitsunori
Tanaka, Shingo
author_facet Tada, Kohei
Ozaki, Hiroyuki
Kiyobayashi, Tetsu
Kitta, Mitsunori
Tanaka, Shingo
author_sort Tada, Kohei
collection PubMed
description Li(3)(Li,Ti(5))O(12) (LTO) is a stable and safe negative electrode material for Li-ion batteries, and its Na substitute Na(3)(Li,Ti(5))O(12) (NTO) is a counterpart for the Na-ion battery. In LTO and NTO, a sixth of the Ti-sites (16d) in the spinel framework are replaced by Li: Li mixing in the 16d sites. For conducting theoretical studies on these materials, e.g., density functional theory (DFT) calculations, one has to confront the astronomical number of combinations of Li distribution in 16d sites to construct model structures, of which the size is sufficiently large to represent the bulk material properties. Only a limited number of models, whose structures are a priori specified by “researcher intuition,” have been examined thus far, and how Li-mixing determines the material stability has yet to be clarified. Herein, we statistically analyzed the DFT total energy of more than 2 × 10(4) model structures of LTO and NTO that were extracted from the 4 × 10(8) possible combinations of Li-mixing with computer-aided symmetry analysis and an automated model building system. The local energy analysis further revealed the local stability/instability of each structure. We found that LTO and NTO stability can be well explained by the apparent coulombic repulsion between Li(+) in the 16d sites as if they were placed in a matrix of dielectric constants of 1.92 and 2.04 for LTO and NTO, respectively. That is, the sum of the inverse of the Li–Li distance (S) serves as a good descriptor in predicting the stability of these materials. The extent to which the O(2−) anions are displaced from the Wyckoff position (32e) is considered to differentiate NTO from LTO. However, the electronic structure of NTO does not significantly differ from that of LTO unless S exceeds a certain limit. These results suggest that the spinel framework tolerates the structural instability and variety to some extent, which is important in constructing a spinel structure with the mixing of other cations, thereby replacing the rare element Li.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9056721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90567212022-05-04 How does the Li-distribution in the 16d sites determine the stability of A(3)(Li,Ti(5))O(12) (A = Li and Na)? Tada, Kohei Ozaki, Hiroyuki Kiyobayashi, Tetsu Kitta, Mitsunori Tanaka, Shingo RSC Adv Chemistry Li(3)(Li,Ti(5))O(12) (LTO) is a stable and safe negative electrode material for Li-ion batteries, and its Na substitute Na(3)(Li,Ti(5))O(12) (NTO) is a counterpart for the Na-ion battery. In LTO and NTO, a sixth of the Ti-sites (16d) in the spinel framework are replaced by Li: Li mixing in the 16d sites. For conducting theoretical studies on these materials, e.g., density functional theory (DFT) calculations, one has to confront the astronomical number of combinations of Li distribution in 16d sites to construct model structures, of which the size is sufficiently large to represent the bulk material properties. Only a limited number of models, whose structures are a priori specified by “researcher intuition,” have been examined thus far, and how Li-mixing determines the material stability has yet to be clarified. Herein, we statistically analyzed the DFT total energy of more than 2 × 10(4) model structures of LTO and NTO that were extracted from the 4 × 10(8) possible combinations of Li-mixing with computer-aided symmetry analysis and an automated model building system. The local energy analysis further revealed the local stability/instability of each structure. We found that LTO and NTO stability can be well explained by the apparent coulombic repulsion between Li(+) in the 16d sites as if they were placed in a matrix of dielectric constants of 1.92 and 2.04 for LTO and NTO, respectively. That is, the sum of the inverse of the Li–Li distance (S) serves as a good descriptor in predicting the stability of these materials. The extent to which the O(2−) anions are displaced from the Wyckoff position (32e) is considered to differentiate NTO from LTO. However, the electronic structure of NTO does not significantly differ from that of LTO unless S exceeds a certain limit. These results suggest that the spinel framework tolerates the structural instability and variety to some extent, which is important in constructing a spinel structure with the mixing of other cations, thereby replacing the rare element Li. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9056721/ /pubmed/35515046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ra06125e Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Tada, Kohei
Ozaki, Hiroyuki
Kiyobayashi, Tetsu
Kitta, Mitsunori
Tanaka, Shingo
How does the Li-distribution in the 16d sites determine the stability of A(3)(Li,Ti(5))O(12) (A = Li and Na)?
title How does the Li-distribution in the 16d sites determine the stability of A(3)(Li,Ti(5))O(12) (A = Li and Na)?
title_full How does the Li-distribution in the 16d sites determine the stability of A(3)(Li,Ti(5))O(12) (A = Li and Na)?
title_fullStr How does the Li-distribution in the 16d sites determine the stability of A(3)(Li,Ti(5))O(12) (A = Li and Na)?
title_full_unstemmed How does the Li-distribution in the 16d sites determine the stability of A(3)(Li,Ti(5))O(12) (A = Li and Na)?
title_short How does the Li-distribution in the 16d sites determine the stability of A(3)(Li,Ti(5))O(12) (A = Li and Na)?
title_sort how does the li-distribution in the 16d sites determine the stability of a(3)(li,ti(5))o(12) (a = li and na)?
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9056721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35515046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ra06125e
work_keys_str_mv AT tadakohei howdoesthelidistributioninthe16dsitesdeterminethestabilityofa3liti5o12aliandna
AT ozakihiroyuki howdoesthelidistributioninthe16dsitesdeterminethestabilityofa3liti5o12aliandna
AT kiyobayashitetsu howdoesthelidistributioninthe16dsitesdeterminethestabilityofa3liti5o12aliandna
AT kittamitsunori howdoesthelidistributioninthe16dsitesdeterminethestabilityofa3liti5o12aliandna
AT tanakashingo howdoesthelidistributioninthe16dsitesdeterminethestabilityofa3liti5o12aliandna