Cargando…
Investigating Non-Visual Eye Movements Non-Intrusively: Comparing Manual and Automatic Annotation Styles
Non-visual eye-movements (NVEMs) are eye movements that do not serve the provision of visual information. As of yet, their cognitive origins and meaning remain under-explored in eye-movement research. The first problem presenting itself in pursuit of their study is one of annotation: in virtue of th...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bern Open Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9057011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35505671 http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.15.2.1 |
_version_ | 1784697797731155968 |
---|---|
author | Stüber, Jeremias Junctorius, Lina Hohenberger, Annette |
author_facet | Stüber, Jeremias Junctorius, Lina Hohenberger, Annette |
author_sort | Stüber, Jeremias |
collection | PubMed |
description | Non-visual eye-movements (NVEMs) are eye movements that do not serve the provision of visual information. As of yet, their cognitive origins and meaning remain under-explored in eye-movement research. The first problem presenting itself in pursuit of their study is one of annotation: in virtue of their being non-visual, they are not necessarily bound to a specific surface or object of interest, rendering conventional eye-trackers nonideal for their study. This, however, makes it potentially viable to investigate them without requiring high resolution data. In this report, we present two approaches to annotating NVEM data – one of them grid-based, involving manual annotation in ELAN (18), the other one Cartesian coordinate-based, derived algorithmically through OpenFace (1). We evaluated a) the two approaches in themselves, e.g. in terms of consistency, as well as b) their compatibility, i.e. the possibilities of mapping one to the other. In the case of a), we found good overall consistency in both approaches, in the case of b), there is evidence for the eventual possibility of mapping the OpenFace gaze estimations onto the manual coding grid. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9057011 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Bern Open Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90570112022-05-02 Investigating Non-Visual Eye Movements Non-Intrusively: Comparing Manual and Automatic Annotation Styles Stüber, Jeremias Junctorius, Lina Hohenberger, Annette J Eye Mov Res Research Article Non-visual eye-movements (NVEMs) are eye movements that do not serve the provision of visual information. As of yet, their cognitive origins and meaning remain under-explored in eye-movement research. The first problem presenting itself in pursuit of their study is one of annotation: in virtue of their being non-visual, they are not necessarily bound to a specific surface or object of interest, rendering conventional eye-trackers nonideal for their study. This, however, makes it potentially viable to investigate them without requiring high resolution data. In this report, we present two approaches to annotating NVEM data – one of them grid-based, involving manual annotation in ELAN (18), the other one Cartesian coordinate-based, derived algorithmically through OpenFace (1). We evaluated a) the two approaches in themselves, e.g. in terms of consistency, as well as b) their compatibility, i.e. the possibilities of mapping one to the other. In the case of a), we found good overall consistency in both approaches, in the case of b), there is evidence for the eventual possibility of mapping the OpenFace gaze estimations onto the manual coding grid. Bern Open Publishing 2022-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9057011/ /pubmed/35505671 http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.15.2.1 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Stüber, Jeremias Junctorius, Lina Hohenberger, Annette Investigating Non-Visual Eye Movements Non-Intrusively: Comparing Manual and Automatic Annotation Styles |
title | Investigating Non-Visual Eye Movements Non-Intrusively: Comparing Manual and Automatic Annotation Styles |
title_full | Investigating Non-Visual Eye Movements Non-Intrusively: Comparing Manual and Automatic Annotation Styles |
title_fullStr | Investigating Non-Visual Eye Movements Non-Intrusively: Comparing Manual and Automatic Annotation Styles |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigating Non-Visual Eye Movements Non-Intrusively: Comparing Manual and Automatic Annotation Styles |
title_short | Investigating Non-Visual Eye Movements Non-Intrusively: Comparing Manual and Automatic Annotation Styles |
title_sort | investigating non-visual eye movements non-intrusively: comparing manual and automatic annotation styles |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9057011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35505671 http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.15.2.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stuberjeremias investigatingnonvisualeyemovementsnonintrusivelycomparingmanualandautomaticannotationstyles AT junctoriuslina investigatingnonvisualeyemovementsnonintrusivelycomparingmanualandautomaticannotationstyles AT hohenbergerannette investigatingnonvisualeyemovementsnonintrusivelycomparingmanualandautomaticannotationstyles |