Cargando…

Investigating Non-Visual Eye Movements Non-Intrusively: Comparing Manual and Automatic Annotation Styles

Non-visual eye-movements (NVEMs) are eye movements that do not serve the provision of visual information. As of yet, their cognitive origins and meaning remain under-explored in eye-movement research. The first problem presenting itself in pursuit of their study is one of annotation: in virtue of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stüber, Jeremias, Junctorius, Lina, Hohenberger, Annette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bern Open Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9057011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35505671
http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.15.2.1
_version_ 1784697797731155968
author Stüber, Jeremias
Junctorius, Lina
Hohenberger, Annette
author_facet Stüber, Jeremias
Junctorius, Lina
Hohenberger, Annette
author_sort Stüber, Jeremias
collection PubMed
description Non-visual eye-movements (NVEMs) are eye movements that do not serve the provision of visual information. As of yet, their cognitive origins and meaning remain under-explored in eye-movement research. The first problem presenting itself in pursuit of their study is one of annotation: in virtue of their being non-visual, they are not necessarily bound to a specific surface or object of interest, rendering conventional eye-trackers nonideal for their study. This, however, makes it potentially viable to investigate them without requiring high resolution data. In this report, we present two approaches to annotating NVEM data – one of them grid-based, involving manual annotation in ELAN (18), the other one Cartesian coordinate-based, derived algorithmically through OpenFace (1). We evaluated a) the two approaches in themselves, e.g. in terms of consistency, as well as b) their compatibility, i.e. the possibilities of mapping one to the other. In the case of a), we found good overall consistency in both approaches, in the case of b), there is evidence for the eventual possibility of mapping the OpenFace gaze estimations onto the manual coding grid.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9057011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Bern Open Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90570112022-05-02 Investigating Non-Visual Eye Movements Non-Intrusively: Comparing Manual and Automatic Annotation Styles Stüber, Jeremias Junctorius, Lina Hohenberger, Annette J Eye Mov Res Research Article Non-visual eye-movements (NVEMs) are eye movements that do not serve the provision of visual information. As of yet, their cognitive origins and meaning remain under-explored in eye-movement research. The first problem presenting itself in pursuit of their study is one of annotation: in virtue of their being non-visual, they are not necessarily bound to a specific surface or object of interest, rendering conventional eye-trackers nonideal for their study. This, however, makes it potentially viable to investigate them without requiring high resolution data. In this report, we present two approaches to annotating NVEM data – one of them grid-based, involving manual annotation in ELAN (18), the other one Cartesian coordinate-based, derived algorithmically through OpenFace (1). We evaluated a) the two approaches in themselves, e.g. in terms of consistency, as well as b) their compatibility, i.e. the possibilities of mapping one to the other. In the case of a), we found good overall consistency in both approaches, in the case of b), there is evidence for the eventual possibility of mapping the OpenFace gaze estimations onto the manual coding grid. Bern Open Publishing 2022-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9057011/ /pubmed/35505671 http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.15.2.1 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stüber, Jeremias
Junctorius, Lina
Hohenberger, Annette
Investigating Non-Visual Eye Movements Non-Intrusively: Comparing Manual and Automatic Annotation Styles
title Investigating Non-Visual Eye Movements Non-Intrusively: Comparing Manual and Automatic Annotation Styles
title_full Investigating Non-Visual Eye Movements Non-Intrusively: Comparing Manual and Automatic Annotation Styles
title_fullStr Investigating Non-Visual Eye Movements Non-Intrusively: Comparing Manual and Automatic Annotation Styles
title_full_unstemmed Investigating Non-Visual Eye Movements Non-Intrusively: Comparing Manual and Automatic Annotation Styles
title_short Investigating Non-Visual Eye Movements Non-Intrusively: Comparing Manual and Automatic Annotation Styles
title_sort investigating non-visual eye movements non-intrusively: comparing manual and automatic annotation styles
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9057011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35505671
http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.15.2.1
work_keys_str_mv AT stuberjeremias investigatingnonvisualeyemovementsnonintrusivelycomparingmanualandautomaticannotationstyles
AT junctoriuslina investigatingnonvisualeyemovementsnonintrusivelycomparingmanualandautomaticannotationstyles
AT hohenbergerannette investigatingnonvisualeyemovementsnonintrusivelycomparingmanualandautomaticannotationstyles