Cargando…
Radiofrequency Ablation for the Knee Joint: A Survey by the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience
BACKGROUND: Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective, minimally invasive procedure often used to treat patients with intractable knee pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis and failed knee replacements. The prevalence of knee pain in adults has been estimated to be as high as 40%...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9057892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35509622 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S342653 |
_version_ | 1784698002471911424 |
---|---|
author | Abd-Elsayed, Alaa Strand, Natalie Gritsenko, Karina Martens, Joshua Chakravarthy, Krishnan Sayed, Dawood Deer, Timothy |
author_facet | Abd-Elsayed, Alaa Strand, Natalie Gritsenko, Karina Martens, Joshua Chakravarthy, Krishnan Sayed, Dawood Deer, Timothy |
author_sort | Abd-Elsayed, Alaa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective, minimally invasive procedure often used to treat patients with intractable knee pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis and failed knee replacements. The prevalence of knee pain in adults has been estimated to be as high as 40% and is continuously increasing with an aging population. Over the past two decades, proceduralists have adopted variations in patient preparation, procedural steps, and post-operative care for genicular nerve RFA procedures. A survey was dispensed via the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) to gain a popular assessment of common practices for genicular nerve RFA. METHODS: A 29 question survey was dispensed via SurveyMonkey to all members of ASPN. Members were able to respond to the survey a single time and were unable to make changes to their responses once the survey was submitted. After responses were compiled, each question was assessed in order to determine common practices for genicular nerve RFA. RESULTS: A total of 378 proceduralists responded to the survey. There was high consensus with the three most commonly targeted nerves. The inferomedial, superomedial, and superolateral genicular branches were treated by 95–96% of respondents, while other targets were less commonly treated. There remains some debate among proceduralists regarding the need for a second diagnostic nerve block and the type of steroid used for diagnostic nerve blocks. CONCLUSION: Pain physicians use a wide variety of methods to perform genicular nerve ablations. The data offered by the survey show that there is no standardized protocol when it comes to treating knee pain via genicular nerve block and ablation and highlights controversies among proceduralists that ought to serve as the targets of future clinical research aimed at establishing a standardized protocol. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9057892 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90578922022-05-03 Radiofrequency Ablation for the Knee Joint: A Survey by the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience Abd-Elsayed, Alaa Strand, Natalie Gritsenko, Karina Martens, Joshua Chakravarthy, Krishnan Sayed, Dawood Deer, Timothy J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective, minimally invasive procedure often used to treat patients with intractable knee pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis and failed knee replacements. The prevalence of knee pain in adults has been estimated to be as high as 40% and is continuously increasing with an aging population. Over the past two decades, proceduralists have adopted variations in patient preparation, procedural steps, and post-operative care for genicular nerve RFA procedures. A survey was dispensed via the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) to gain a popular assessment of common practices for genicular nerve RFA. METHODS: A 29 question survey was dispensed via SurveyMonkey to all members of ASPN. Members were able to respond to the survey a single time and were unable to make changes to their responses once the survey was submitted. After responses were compiled, each question was assessed in order to determine common practices for genicular nerve RFA. RESULTS: A total of 378 proceduralists responded to the survey. There was high consensus with the three most commonly targeted nerves. The inferomedial, superomedial, and superolateral genicular branches were treated by 95–96% of respondents, while other targets were less commonly treated. There remains some debate among proceduralists regarding the need for a second diagnostic nerve block and the type of steroid used for diagnostic nerve blocks. CONCLUSION: Pain physicians use a wide variety of methods to perform genicular nerve ablations. The data offered by the survey show that there is no standardized protocol when it comes to treating knee pain via genicular nerve block and ablation and highlights controversies among proceduralists that ought to serve as the targets of future clinical research aimed at establishing a standardized protocol. Dove 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9057892/ /pubmed/35509622 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S342653 Text en © 2022 Abd-Elsayed et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Abd-Elsayed, Alaa Strand, Natalie Gritsenko, Karina Martens, Joshua Chakravarthy, Krishnan Sayed, Dawood Deer, Timothy Radiofrequency Ablation for the Knee Joint: A Survey by the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience |
title | Radiofrequency Ablation for the Knee Joint: A Survey by the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience |
title_full | Radiofrequency Ablation for the Knee Joint: A Survey by the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience |
title_fullStr | Radiofrequency Ablation for the Knee Joint: A Survey by the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiofrequency Ablation for the Knee Joint: A Survey by the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience |
title_short | Radiofrequency Ablation for the Knee Joint: A Survey by the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience |
title_sort | radiofrequency ablation for the knee joint: a survey by the american society of pain and neuroscience |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9057892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35509622 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S342653 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdelsayedalaa radiofrequencyablationforthekneejointasurveybytheamericansocietyofpainandneuroscience AT strandnatalie radiofrequencyablationforthekneejointasurveybytheamericansocietyofpainandneuroscience AT gritsenkokarina radiofrequencyablationforthekneejointasurveybytheamericansocietyofpainandneuroscience AT martensjoshua radiofrequencyablationforthekneejointasurveybytheamericansocietyofpainandneuroscience AT chakravarthykrishnan radiofrequencyablationforthekneejointasurveybytheamericansocietyofpainandneuroscience AT sayeddawood radiofrequencyablationforthekneejointasurveybytheamericansocietyofpainandneuroscience AT deertimothy radiofrequencyablationforthekneejointasurveybytheamericansocietyofpainandneuroscience |