Cargando…

Group-Based and Individually Delivered LiFE: Content Evaluation and Predictors of Training Response – A Dose-Response Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Lifestyle-integrated Functional Exercise (LiFE) is an effective, individually delivered fall prevention program but comes with substantial resource requirements; hence, a group-format was developed (gLiFE). This study 1) evaluates the program content of two different LiFE formats (grou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nerz, Corinna, Kramer-Gmeiner, Franziska, Jansen, Carl-Philipp, Labudek, Sarah, Klenk, Jochen, Becker, Clemens, Schwenk, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9057901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35509348
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S359150
_version_ 1784698003906363392
author Nerz, Corinna
Kramer-Gmeiner, Franziska
Jansen, Carl-Philipp
Labudek, Sarah
Klenk, Jochen
Becker, Clemens
Schwenk, Michael
author_facet Nerz, Corinna
Kramer-Gmeiner, Franziska
Jansen, Carl-Philipp
Labudek, Sarah
Klenk, Jochen
Becker, Clemens
Schwenk, Michael
author_sort Nerz, Corinna
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Lifestyle-integrated Functional Exercise (LiFE) is an effective, individually delivered fall prevention program but comes with substantial resource requirements; hence, a group-format was developed (gLiFE). This study 1) evaluates the program content of two different LiFE formats (group vs individual) and 2) examines the relationship between predictors of training response (dose) and improvements in balance, strength, and physical activity (PA) (response). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis included n = 252 (gLiFE = 126, LiFE = 126) community-dwelling older adults (78.6±5.2 years). LiFE was administered in seven sessions either in a group (gLiFE: 8–12 participants) or individually at home (LiFE). Questionnaire-based, descriptive content evaluation (frequency distributions) included reported frequency of practice (days/week, number of activities), activity preferences, safety, intensity, integrability of activities, and acceptance after 6 months of LiFE practice. Predictors (ie, dose [reported frequency and intensity], safety, and integrability of activities) for improvements in balance, strength, and PA were analyzed using radar charts. RESULTS: In both formats, 11.2 activities were practiced on average. Strength activities were more frequently selected than balance. Content evaluation showed some marginal advantages for the LiFE participants for selected aspects. The effects on balance, strength, and PA were nearly similar in both groups. Participants who performed balance activities more frequently (≥4 days/week) scored better in the balance and PA domain. Those who performed strength activities more frequently (≥4 days/week) performed better in all three outcomes. Higher perceived safety was associated with better performance. Those who reported activities as “not physically exhausting” performed better in all three outcomes. Those who found activities easily integrable into daily routines scored higher in the balance and strength domain. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Overall, both program formats are comparable with respect to content evaluation and effects. Participants need to perceive the activities as safe, not exhausting, and should practice ≥4 days/week to generate a high benefit from the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03462654. Registered on 12 March 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9057901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90579012022-05-03 Group-Based and Individually Delivered LiFE: Content Evaluation and Predictors of Training Response – A Dose-Response Analysis Nerz, Corinna Kramer-Gmeiner, Franziska Jansen, Carl-Philipp Labudek, Sarah Klenk, Jochen Becker, Clemens Schwenk, Michael Clin Interv Aging Clinical Trial Report INTRODUCTION: Lifestyle-integrated Functional Exercise (LiFE) is an effective, individually delivered fall prevention program but comes with substantial resource requirements; hence, a group-format was developed (gLiFE). This study 1) evaluates the program content of two different LiFE formats (group vs individual) and 2) examines the relationship between predictors of training response (dose) and improvements in balance, strength, and physical activity (PA) (response). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis included n = 252 (gLiFE = 126, LiFE = 126) community-dwelling older adults (78.6±5.2 years). LiFE was administered in seven sessions either in a group (gLiFE: 8–12 participants) or individually at home (LiFE). Questionnaire-based, descriptive content evaluation (frequency distributions) included reported frequency of practice (days/week, number of activities), activity preferences, safety, intensity, integrability of activities, and acceptance after 6 months of LiFE practice. Predictors (ie, dose [reported frequency and intensity], safety, and integrability of activities) for improvements in balance, strength, and PA were analyzed using radar charts. RESULTS: In both formats, 11.2 activities were practiced on average. Strength activities were more frequently selected than balance. Content evaluation showed some marginal advantages for the LiFE participants for selected aspects. The effects on balance, strength, and PA were nearly similar in both groups. Participants who performed balance activities more frequently (≥4 days/week) scored better in the balance and PA domain. Those who performed strength activities more frequently (≥4 days/week) performed better in all three outcomes. Higher perceived safety was associated with better performance. Those who reported activities as “not physically exhausting” performed better in all three outcomes. Those who found activities easily integrable into daily routines scored higher in the balance and strength domain. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Overall, both program formats are comparable with respect to content evaluation and effects. Participants need to perceive the activities as safe, not exhausting, and should practice ≥4 days/week to generate a high benefit from the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03462654. Registered on 12 March 2018. Dove 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9057901/ /pubmed/35509348 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S359150 Text en © 2022 Nerz et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Clinical Trial Report
Nerz, Corinna
Kramer-Gmeiner, Franziska
Jansen, Carl-Philipp
Labudek, Sarah
Klenk, Jochen
Becker, Clemens
Schwenk, Michael
Group-Based and Individually Delivered LiFE: Content Evaluation and Predictors of Training Response – A Dose-Response Analysis
title Group-Based and Individually Delivered LiFE: Content Evaluation and Predictors of Training Response – A Dose-Response Analysis
title_full Group-Based and Individually Delivered LiFE: Content Evaluation and Predictors of Training Response – A Dose-Response Analysis
title_fullStr Group-Based and Individually Delivered LiFE: Content Evaluation and Predictors of Training Response – A Dose-Response Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Group-Based and Individually Delivered LiFE: Content Evaluation and Predictors of Training Response – A Dose-Response Analysis
title_short Group-Based and Individually Delivered LiFE: Content Evaluation and Predictors of Training Response – A Dose-Response Analysis
title_sort group-based and individually delivered life: content evaluation and predictors of training response – a dose-response analysis
topic Clinical Trial Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9057901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35509348
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S359150
work_keys_str_mv AT nerzcorinna groupbasedandindividuallydeliveredlifecontentevaluationandpredictorsoftrainingresponseadoseresponseanalysis
AT kramergmeinerfranziska groupbasedandindividuallydeliveredlifecontentevaluationandpredictorsoftrainingresponseadoseresponseanalysis
AT jansencarlphilipp groupbasedandindividuallydeliveredlifecontentevaluationandpredictorsoftrainingresponseadoseresponseanalysis
AT labudeksarah groupbasedandindividuallydeliveredlifecontentevaluationandpredictorsoftrainingresponseadoseresponseanalysis
AT klenkjochen groupbasedandindividuallydeliveredlifecontentevaluationandpredictorsoftrainingresponseadoseresponseanalysis
AT beckerclemens groupbasedandindividuallydeliveredlifecontentevaluationandpredictorsoftrainingresponseadoseresponseanalysis
AT schwenkmichael groupbasedandindividuallydeliveredlifecontentevaluationandpredictorsoftrainingresponseadoseresponseanalysis