Cargando…

Effect of morphology and impact of the electrode/electrolyte interface on the PEC response of Fe(2)O(3) based systems – comparison of two preparation techniques

The present study is a comparative account of Fe(2)O(3) based photoelectrodes prepared by two different techniques, namely spray pyrolysis and electrochemical deposition, followed by photoelectrochemical analysis at pH 13 (highly alkaline) and pH 8 (near neutral) in 0.1 M NaOH solution for solar hyd...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asha, Kumari, Satsangi, Vibha Rani, Shrivastav, Rohit, Kant, Rama, Dass, Sahab
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9057922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35516748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ra07870k
_version_ 1784698008104861696
author Asha, Kumari
Satsangi, Vibha Rani
Shrivastav, Rohit
Kant, Rama
Dass, Sahab
author_facet Asha, Kumari
Satsangi, Vibha Rani
Shrivastav, Rohit
Kant, Rama
Dass, Sahab
author_sort Asha, Kumari
collection PubMed
description The present study is a comparative account of Fe(2)O(3) based photoelectrodes prepared by two different techniques, namely spray pyrolysis and electrochemical deposition, followed by photoelectrochemical analysis at pH 13 (highly alkaline) and pH 8 (near neutral) in 0.1 M NaOH solution for solar hydrogen generation. The study also investigates the influence of morphology at the semiconductor electrode/electrolyte interface along with quantitative determination of the morphological parameters of the rough electrode surface affecting the photoelectrochemical response using power spectral density analysis. Studies revealed that the Fe(2)O(3) sample (E_100cy) prepared with 100 cycles of electrochemical deposition showed the highest photocurrent density of 2.37 mA cm(−2) and 1.18 mA cm(−2) at 1 V vs. SCE at pH 13 and 8 respectively. Power spectral density analysis exhibited that E_100cy possesses smallest surface features contributing to the PEC response with a lower cut off length scale of 17.23, upper cut off length scale of 150.45, maximum fractal dimension of 2.62 and maximum average rms roughness of 17.52 nm, offering the maximum surface area for charge transfer reactions at the electrode/electrolyte interface. The sample E_100cy exhibited the highest ABPE of 1.29% and IPCE of 37.5%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9057922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90579222022-05-04 Effect of morphology and impact of the electrode/electrolyte interface on the PEC response of Fe(2)O(3) based systems – comparison of two preparation techniques Asha, Kumari Satsangi, Vibha Rani Shrivastav, Rohit Kant, Rama Dass, Sahab RSC Adv Chemistry The present study is a comparative account of Fe(2)O(3) based photoelectrodes prepared by two different techniques, namely spray pyrolysis and electrochemical deposition, followed by photoelectrochemical analysis at pH 13 (highly alkaline) and pH 8 (near neutral) in 0.1 M NaOH solution for solar hydrogen generation. The study also investigates the influence of morphology at the semiconductor electrode/electrolyte interface along with quantitative determination of the morphological parameters of the rough electrode surface affecting the photoelectrochemical response using power spectral density analysis. Studies revealed that the Fe(2)O(3) sample (E_100cy) prepared with 100 cycles of electrochemical deposition showed the highest photocurrent density of 2.37 mA cm(−2) and 1.18 mA cm(−2) at 1 V vs. SCE at pH 13 and 8 respectively. Power spectral density analysis exhibited that E_100cy possesses smallest surface features contributing to the PEC response with a lower cut off length scale of 17.23, upper cut off length scale of 150.45, maximum fractal dimension of 2.62 and maximum average rms roughness of 17.52 nm, offering the maximum surface area for charge transfer reactions at the electrode/electrolyte interface. The sample E_100cy exhibited the highest ABPE of 1.29% and IPCE of 37.5%. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9057922/ /pubmed/35516748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ra07870k Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Asha, Kumari
Satsangi, Vibha Rani
Shrivastav, Rohit
Kant, Rama
Dass, Sahab
Effect of morphology and impact of the electrode/electrolyte interface on the PEC response of Fe(2)O(3) based systems – comparison of two preparation techniques
title Effect of morphology and impact of the electrode/electrolyte interface on the PEC response of Fe(2)O(3) based systems – comparison of two preparation techniques
title_full Effect of morphology and impact of the electrode/electrolyte interface on the PEC response of Fe(2)O(3) based systems – comparison of two preparation techniques
title_fullStr Effect of morphology and impact of the electrode/electrolyte interface on the PEC response of Fe(2)O(3) based systems – comparison of two preparation techniques
title_full_unstemmed Effect of morphology and impact of the electrode/electrolyte interface on the PEC response of Fe(2)O(3) based systems – comparison of two preparation techniques
title_short Effect of morphology and impact of the electrode/electrolyte interface on the PEC response of Fe(2)O(3) based systems – comparison of two preparation techniques
title_sort effect of morphology and impact of the electrode/electrolyte interface on the pec response of fe(2)o(3) based systems – comparison of two preparation techniques
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9057922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35516748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ra07870k
work_keys_str_mv AT ashakumari effectofmorphologyandimpactoftheelectrodeelectrolyteinterfaceonthepecresponseoffe2o3basedsystemscomparisonoftwopreparationtechniques
AT satsangivibharani effectofmorphologyandimpactoftheelectrodeelectrolyteinterfaceonthepecresponseoffe2o3basedsystemscomparisonoftwopreparationtechniques
AT shrivastavrohit effectofmorphologyandimpactoftheelectrodeelectrolyteinterfaceonthepecresponseoffe2o3basedsystemscomparisonoftwopreparationtechniques
AT kantrama effectofmorphologyandimpactoftheelectrodeelectrolyteinterfaceonthepecresponseoffe2o3basedsystemscomparisonoftwopreparationtechniques
AT dasssahab effectofmorphologyandimpactoftheelectrodeelectrolyteinterfaceonthepecresponseoffe2o3basedsystemscomparisonoftwopreparationtechniques