Cargando…
COVID-19 advanced respiratory care educational training programme for healthcare workers in Lesotho: an observational study
OBJECTIVE: To develop and implement a ‘low-dose, high-frequency’ (LDHF) advanced respiratory care training programme for COVID-19 care in Lesotho. DESIGN: Prospective pretraining–post-training evaluation. SETTING: Lesotho has limited capacity in advanced respiratory care. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9058317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35487754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058643 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: To develop and implement a ‘low-dose, high-frequency’ (LDHF) advanced respiratory care training programme for COVID-19 care in Lesotho. DESIGN: Prospective pretraining–post-training evaluation. SETTING: Lesotho has limited capacity in advanced respiratory care. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians and nurses. INTERVENTIONS: Due to limited participation in May–September 2020, the LDHF approach was modified into a traditional 1-day offsite training in November 2020 that reviewed respiratory anatomy and physiology, clinical principles for conventional oxygen, heated high-flow nasal cannula and non-invasive ventilation management. Basic mechanical ventilation principles were introduced. OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants completed a 20-question multiple choice examination immediately before and after the 1-day training. Paired t-tests were used to evaluate the difference in average participant pretraining and post-training examination scores. RESULTS: Pretraining and post-training examinations were completed by 46/53 (86.7%) participants, of whom 93.4% (n=43) were nurses. The overall mean pretraining score was 44.8% (SD 12.4%). Mean scores improved by an average of 23.7 percentage points (95% CI 19.7 to 27.6, p<0.001) on the post-training examination to a mean score of 68.5% (SD 13.6%). Performance on basic and advanced respiratory categories also improved by 17.7 (95% CI 11.6 to 23.8) and 25.6 percentage points (95% CI 20.4 to 30.8) (p<0.001). Likewise, mean examination scores increased on the post-training test, compared with pretraining, for questions related to respiratory management (29.6 percentage points, 95% CI 24.1 to 35.0) and physiology (17.4 percentage points, 95% CI 12.0 to 22.8). CONCLUSIONS: An LDHF training approach was not feasible during this early emergency period of the COVID-19 pandemic in Lesotho. Despite clear knowledge gains, the modest post-training examination scores coupled with limited physician engagement suggest healthcare workers require alternative educational strategies before higher advanced care like mechanical ventilation is implementable. Conventional and high-flow oxygen is better aligned with post-training healthcare worker knowledge levels and rapid implementation. |
---|