Cargando…

Duty Hours Tracking – Is There an App for That?

BACKGROUND: To monitor duty hour compliance residency programs have used self-report methods which can be skewed by recall bias and data falsification. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of and resident attitudes towards two duty hours tracking tools within our Orthopedic residenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jorgensen, Alexis, Savage, Nastassia M., Sun, Xinxin, Domson, Gregory
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9058355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35509685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23821205221096350
_version_ 1784698096699047936
author Jorgensen, Alexis
Savage, Nastassia M.
Sun, Xinxin
Domson, Gregory
author_facet Jorgensen, Alexis
Savage, Nastassia M.
Sun, Xinxin
Domson, Gregory
author_sort Jorgensen, Alexis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To monitor duty hour compliance residency programs have used self-report methods which can be skewed by recall bias and data falsification. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of and resident attitudes towards two duty hours tracking tools within our Orthopedic residency. We compared our institution's current self-report method of duty hours tracking via New Innovations (NI) with an automated method utilizing Hours Tracker (HT), a smartphone application which automatically logs work hours via GPS coordinates. The primary outcome measures were number of duty hour violations and survey results on resident perceptions. METHODS: The participants were 22 residents of our 25 resident Orthopedic program. Over four weeks, residents tracked duty hours through the standard, selfreport method (NI) and simultaneously through the automated app (HT). Residents also completed an anonymous survey at the end of the study related to perceptions of the methods. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in overall number of violations between NI and HT. HT detected more violations of the 8 hours off requirement (12 vs. 5, p = 0.03). Survey data revealed residents found HT significantly easier to use (p = .004) and less burdensome (p < .001) but in greater violation of privacy (p = .001). Residents reported they were more likely to falsify their hours when using NI (p = .002) and that the results of NI would be more likely used against them (p = .042). When analyzing by training year, junior residents indicated HT was overall easier to use than senior residents (p = .048). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed NI and HT are at least equivalent in accuracy with the app being overall better received, particularly by junior level residents. Until we begin accurately tracking duty hours and engaging residents with an easy to use, well-received interface to which report hours, effective developmental program changes will be difficult to achieve. An app-based approach is a starting point for re-thinking duty hours tracking within this digital age.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9058355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90583552022-05-03 Duty Hours Tracking – Is There an App for That? Jorgensen, Alexis Savage, Nastassia M. Sun, Xinxin Domson, Gregory J Med Educ Curric Dev Original Research BACKGROUND: To monitor duty hour compliance residency programs have used self-report methods which can be skewed by recall bias and data falsification. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of and resident attitudes towards two duty hours tracking tools within our Orthopedic residency. We compared our institution's current self-report method of duty hours tracking via New Innovations (NI) with an automated method utilizing Hours Tracker (HT), a smartphone application which automatically logs work hours via GPS coordinates. The primary outcome measures were number of duty hour violations and survey results on resident perceptions. METHODS: The participants were 22 residents of our 25 resident Orthopedic program. Over four weeks, residents tracked duty hours through the standard, selfreport method (NI) and simultaneously through the automated app (HT). Residents also completed an anonymous survey at the end of the study related to perceptions of the methods. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in overall number of violations between NI and HT. HT detected more violations of the 8 hours off requirement (12 vs. 5, p = 0.03). Survey data revealed residents found HT significantly easier to use (p = .004) and less burdensome (p < .001) but in greater violation of privacy (p = .001). Residents reported they were more likely to falsify their hours when using NI (p = .002) and that the results of NI would be more likely used against them (p = .042). When analyzing by training year, junior residents indicated HT was overall easier to use than senior residents (p = .048). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed NI and HT are at least equivalent in accuracy with the app being overall better received, particularly by junior level residents. Until we begin accurately tracking duty hours and engaging residents with an easy to use, well-received interface to which report hours, effective developmental program changes will be difficult to achieve. An app-based approach is a starting point for re-thinking duty hours tracking within this digital age. SAGE Publications 2022-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9058355/ /pubmed/35509685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23821205221096350 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Jorgensen, Alexis
Savage, Nastassia M.
Sun, Xinxin
Domson, Gregory
Duty Hours Tracking – Is There an App for That?
title Duty Hours Tracking – Is There an App for That?
title_full Duty Hours Tracking – Is There an App for That?
title_fullStr Duty Hours Tracking – Is There an App for That?
title_full_unstemmed Duty Hours Tracking – Is There an App for That?
title_short Duty Hours Tracking – Is There an App for That?
title_sort duty hours tracking – is there an app for that?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9058355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35509685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23821205221096350
work_keys_str_mv AT jorgensenalexis dutyhourstrackingisthereanappforthat
AT savagenastassiam dutyhourstrackingisthereanappforthat
AT sunxinxin dutyhourstrackingisthereanappforthat
AT domsongregory dutyhourstrackingisthereanappforthat