Cargando…

Urinary Antigen Testing for Respiratory Infections: Current Perspectives on Utility and Limitations

Pneumonia is a leading cause of hospitalization and death due to infection worldwide. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila remain among the most commonly identified bacterial pathogens. Unfortunately, more than half of all pneumonia cases today lack an etiologic diagnosis due to limit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Priscilla, Deshpande, Abhishek, Rothberg, Michael B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9058651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35510157
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S321168
_version_ 1784698159739437056
author Kim, Priscilla
Deshpande, Abhishek
Rothberg, Michael B
author_facet Kim, Priscilla
Deshpande, Abhishek
Rothberg, Michael B
author_sort Kim, Priscilla
collection PubMed
description Pneumonia is a leading cause of hospitalization and death due to infection worldwide. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila remain among the most commonly identified bacterial pathogens. Unfortunately, more than half of all pneumonia cases today lack an etiologic diagnosis due to limitations in traditional microbiological methods like blood and sputum cultures, which are affected by poor sample collection, prior antibiotic administration, and delayed processing. Urinary antigen tests (UATs) for S. pneumoniae and L. pneumophila have emerged as powerful tools for improving the diagnosis of bacterial respiratory infections, enabling physicians to administer early directed therapy and improve antimicrobial stewardship. UATs are simple, rapid, and non-invasive diagnostic tests with high specificity (>90%) and moderate sensitivity (<80%). The potential impact of urinary antigen testing is especially significant for respiratory infections caused by Legionella. While all recommended community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) therapies are adequate for treating pneumococcal pneumonia, only certain antibiotics are effective against Legionella. Delayed therapy for Legionella is associated with worse clinical outcomes, which underscores the importance of rapid diagnostic methods like UATs. Despite their potential impact, current American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America (ATS/IDSA) guidelines argue against the routine use of urinary antigen testing for S. pneumoniae and L. pneumophila, except in patients with severe CAP and those with epidemiological risk factors for Legionella. Further research is necessary to evaluate the impact of early targeted treatment due to positive UAT results, as well as optimal strategies for UAT utilization. The purpose of this review is to summarize the UATs available for bacterial respiratory infections, describe current guidelines on their usage, and assess their impact on clinical outcomes and targeted therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9058651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90586512022-05-03 Urinary Antigen Testing for Respiratory Infections: Current Perspectives on Utility and Limitations Kim, Priscilla Deshpande, Abhishek Rothberg, Michael B Infect Drug Resist Review Pneumonia is a leading cause of hospitalization and death due to infection worldwide. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila remain among the most commonly identified bacterial pathogens. Unfortunately, more than half of all pneumonia cases today lack an etiologic diagnosis due to limitations in traditional microbiological methods like blood and sputum cultures, which are affected by poor sample collection, prior antibiotic administration, and delayed processing. Urinary antigen tests (UATs) for S. pneumoniae and L. pneumophila have emerged as powerful tools for improving the diagnosis of bacterial respiratory infections, enabling physicians to administer early directed therapy and improve antimicrobial stewardship. UATs are simple, rapid, and non-invasive diagnostic tests with high specificity (>90%) and moderate sensitivity (<80%). The potential impact of urinary antigen testing is especially significant for respiratory infections caused by Legionella. While all recommended community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) therapies are adequate for treating pneumococcal pneumonia, only certain antibiotics are effective against Legionella. Delayed therapy for Legionella is associated with worse clinical outcomes, which underscores the importance of rapid diagnostic methods like UATs. Despite their potential impact, current American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America (ATS/IDSA) guidelines argue against the routine use of urinary antigen testing for S. pneumoniae and L. pneumophila, except in patients with severe CAP and those with epidemiological risk factors for Legionella. Further research is necessary to evaluate the impact of early targeted treatment due to positive UAT results, as well as optimal strategies for UAT utilization. The purpose of this review is to summarize the UATs available for bacterial respiratory infections, describe current guidelines on their usage, and assess their impact on clinical outcomes and targeted therapy. Dove 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9058651/ /pubmed/35510157 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S321168 Text en © 2022 Kim et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Kim, Priscilla
Deshpande, Abhishek
Rothberg, Michael B
Urinary Antigen Testing for Respiratory Infections: Current Perspectives on Utility and Limitations
title Urinary Antigen Testing for Respiratory Infections: Current Perspectives on Utility and Limitations
title_full Urinary Antigen Testing for Respiratory Infections: Current Perspectives on Utility and Limitations
title_fullStr Urinary Antigen Testing for Respiratory Infections: Current Perspectives on Utility and Limitations
title_full_unstemmed Urinary Antigen Testing for Respiratory Infections: Current Perspectives on Utility and Limitations
title_short Urinary Antigen Testing for Respiratory Infections: Current Perspectives on Utility and Limitations
title_sort urinary antigen testing for respiratory infections: current perspectives on utility and limitations
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9058651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35510157
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S321168
work_keys_str_mv AT kimpriscilla urinaryantigentestingforrespiratoryinfectionscurrentperspectivesonutilityandlimitations
AT deshpandeabhishek urinaryantigentestingforrespiratoryinfectionscurrentperspectivesonutilityandlimitations
AT rothbergmichaelb urinaryantigentestingforrespiratoryinfectionscurrentperspectivesonutilityandlimitations