Cargando…

Challenges of caring for homeless patients with inflammatory arthritis: 12-month follow-up observations and identification of certain barriers to care

Homelessness is a public health crisis and there is a paucity of information about patients with rheumatic disease experiencing homelessness. We sought to develop approaches to improve care for this unique patient population. We previously reported observations on 17 homeless patients with inflammat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rai, Baljeet, Kobashigawa, Laura, Amarnani, Abhimanyu, Ward, Nicole K. Zagelbaum, Feldman, Corinne, Feldman, Brett, Panush, Richard S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9058743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35499771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06167-2
Descripción
Sumario:Homelessness is a public health crisis and there is a paucity of information about patients with rheumatic disease experiencing homelessness. We sought to develop approaches to improve care for this unique patient population. We previously reported observations on 17 homeless patients with inflammatory arthritis (15 rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 2 psoriatic arthritis (PsA)). We obtained follow-up information from our original 17 patients and compared this to data summarized and published about them from 12 months previously. We also created and administered a 100-question needs assessment survey. Follow-up 12-month clinical information was available from 13/17 homeless and 13/17 non-homeless controls. Homeless patients remained less well with more disease than non-homeless patients—poorer access to clinic appointments (80% vs 91%, p < 0.05), more emergency services use (20 vs 5 ED visits), less DMARDs use (43% vs 100%, p < 0.01), and more steroid use (29% vs 0%, p < 0.01). Homeless patients also had higher inflammatory markers than non-homeless patients (ESR 32 vs 26 mm/h and CRP 17 vs 5 mg/L), although these findings were not statistically significantly different. Seventy-eight percent of homeless patients were stable, 14% improved, and 7% worse; 21% had stable controlled and 57% stable active disease vs 62% and 0% of non-homeless (p < 0.01). Among the homeless, 6 (4 RA, 2 PsA) completed the survey, 2 declined, and 9 could not be reached. All 6 had found housing although all still had housing insecurity; 4 (67%) were homeless in the past. Three out of six (50%) obtained housing from social assistance during hospitalization following disease exacerbation while homeless. The average monthly income was $873. 5/6 (83.3%), were unable to work due to health, and were in considerable pain that adversely impacted their physical and mental health and ability to perform ADLs. Their perceived “greatest need” included dental care, physical therapy, knee surgery, employment, socialization secondary to isolation, and stable housing. Our understanding of the unique challenges of patients with rheumatic disease experiencing homelessness is improved, but not complete. Strengthened collaboration between street medicine providers and rheumatologists is necessary to improve care for homeless patients, especially given poorer outcomes compared with non-homeless counterparts.