Cargando…

Using knowledge brokering activities to promote allied health clinicians’ engagement in research: a qualitative exploration

INTRODUCTION: Engaging clinicians in research can improve healthcare organisational performance, patient and staff satisfaction. Emerging evidence suggests that knowledge brokering activities potentially support clinicians’ research engagement, but it is unclear how best they should be used. OBJECTI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mickan, S, Wenke, Rachel, Weir, Kelly, Bialocerkowski, Andrea, Noble, Christy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9058767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35487731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060456
_version_ 1784698183244316672
author Mickan, S
Wenke, Rachel
Weir, Kelly
Bialocerkowski, Andrea
Noble, Christy
author_facet Mickan, S
Wenke, Rachel
Weir, Kelly
Bialocerkowski, Andrea
Noble, Christy
author_sort Mickan, S
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Engaging clinicians in research can improve healthcare organisational performance, patient and staff satisfaction. Emerging evidence suggests that knowledge brokering activities potentially support clinicians’ research engagement, but it is unclear how best they should be used. OBJECTIVES: This study explores how embedded researchers utilised knowledge brokering activities to engage research interested clinicians in research. DESIGN: A longitudinal qualitative interview based study was co-designed to investigate how experienced research fellows utilise knowledge brokering activities to facilitate allied health clinicians’ engagement in research. SETTING: In one large tertiary level, regional Australian health service, research fellows were matched with research interested clinicians. METHODS: Qualitative analysis of three longitudinal semi-structured interviews for each research fellow was undertaken. Initial descriptions of their utilisation of knowledge brokering activities were deductively coded. Reflexive thematic analysis was utilised to generate a shared explanation of clinicians’ engagement in research. RESULTS: Three research fellows facilitated 21 clinicians’ participation in and leadership of clinical research projects over 12 months. They utilised all ten key knowledge brokering activities with each clinician, with differing patterns and examples. Research fellows described using linkage and exchange activities of communicating and collaborating with key stakeholders, and they tailored knowledge management products for individual’s engagement. Further, they described a broader learning journey where they clarified and monitored individuals’ capabilities, motivation and their contextual support for research engagement. CONCLUSION: When research fellows chose and tailored knowledge brokering activities to align and extend clinicians’ research capabilities and motivation, they created individualised learning curriculums to support clinicians’ participation in and leadership of local research projects. Health and academic leaders should consider structuring embedded researcher positions to include knowledge brokering roles and activities, specifically for research interested clinicians who are ready to participate in and lead research projects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9058767
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90587672022-05-12 Using knowledge brokering activities to promote allied health clinicians’ engagement in research: a qualitative exploration Mickan, S Wenke, Rachel Weir, Kelly Bialocerkowski, Andrea Noble, Christy BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Engaging clinicians in research can improve healthcare organisational performance, patient and staff satisfaction. Emerging evidence suggests that knowledge brokering activities potentially support clinicians’ research engagement, but it is unclear how best they should be used. OBJECTIVES: This study explores how embedded researchers utilised knowledge brokering activities to engage research interested clinicians in research. DESIGN: A longitudinal qualitative interview based study was co-designed to investigate how experienced research fellows utilise knowledge brokering activities to facilitate allied health clinicians’ engagement in research. SETTING: In one large tertiary level, regional Australian health service, research fellows were matched with research interested clinicians. METHODS: Qualitative analysis of three longitudinal semi-structured interviews for each research fellow was undertaken. Initial descriptions of their utilisation of knowledge brokering activities were deductively coded. Reflexive thematic analysis was utilised to generate a shared explanation of clinicians’ engagement in research. RESULTS: Three research fellows facilitated 21 clinicians’ participation in and leadership of clinical research projects over 12 months. They utilised all ten key knowledge brokering activities with each clinician, with differing patterns and examples. Research fellows described using linkage and exchange activities of communicating and collaborating with key stakeholders, and they tailored knowledge management products for individual’s engagement. Further, they described a broader learning journey where they clarified and monitored individuals’ capabilities, motivation and their contextual support for research engagement. CONCLUSION: When research fellows chose and tailored knowledge brokering activities to align and extend clinicians’ research capabilities and motivation, they created individualised learning curriculums to support clinicians’ participation in and leadership of local research projects. Health and academic leaders should consider structuring embedded researcher positions to include knowledge brokering roles and activities, specifically for research interested clinicians who are ready to participate in and lead research projects. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9058767/ /pubmed/35487731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060456 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Mickan, S
Wenke, Rachel
Weir, Kelly
Bialocerkowski, Andrea
Noble, Christy
Using knowledge brokering activities to promote allied health clinicians’ engagement in research: a qualitative exploration
title Using knowledge brokering activities to promote allied health clinicians’ engagement in research: a qualitative exploration
title_full Using knowledge brokering activities to promote allied health clinicians’ engagement in research: a qualitative exploration
title_fullStr Using knowledge brokering activities to promote allied health clinicians’ engagement in research: a qualitative exploration
title_full_unstemmed Using knowledge brokering activities to promote allied health clinicians’ engagement in research: a qualitative exploration
title_short Using knowledge brokering activities to promote allied health clinicians’ engagement in research: a qualitative exploration
title_sort using knowledge brokering activities to promote allied health clinicians’ engagement in research: a qualitative exploration
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9058767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35487731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060456
work_keys_str_mv AT mickans usingknowledgebrokeringactivitiestopromotealliedhealthcliniciansengagementinresearchaqualitativeexploration
AT wenkerachel usingknowledgebrokeringactivitiestopromotealliedhealthcliniciansengagementinresearchaqualitativeexploration
AT weirkelly usingknowledgebrokeringactivitiestopromotealliedhealthcliniciansengagementinresearchaqualitativeexploration
AT bialocerkowskiandrea usingknowledgebrokeringactivitiestopromotealliedhealthcliniciansengagementinresearchaqualitativeexploration
AT noblechristy usingknowledgebrokeringactivitiestopromotealliedhealthcliniciansengagementinresearchaqualitativeexploration