Cargando…

Identification of outcomes to inform the development of a core outcome set for surgical innovation: a targeted review of case studies of novel surgical devices

OBJECTIVE: Outcome selection and reporting in studies of novel surgical procedures and devices lacks standardisation, hindering safe and effective evaluation. A core outcome set (COS) to measure and report in all studies of surgical innovation is needed. We explored outcomes in a specific sample of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Wilson, Nicholas, Macefield, Rhiannon C, Hoffmann, Christin, Edmondson, Matthew J, Miller, Rachael L, Kirkham, Emily N, Blencowe, Natalie S, McNair, Angus G K, Main, Barry G, Blazeby, Jane M, Avery, Kerry N L, Potter, Shelley
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:	Surgery
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9058790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35487755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056003

Ejemplares similares

A Core Outcome Set for Seamless, Standardized Evaluation of Innovative Surgical Procedures and Devices (COHESIVE): A Patient and Professional Stakeholder Consensus Study
por: Avery, Kerry N.L., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Reporting Modifications in Surgical Innovation: A Systematic Scoping Review Protocol
por: Hoffmann, Christin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review
por: Hossaini, Sina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Shared Learning Utilizing Digital Methods in Surgery to Enhance Transparency in Surgical Innovation: Protocol for a Scoping Review
por: Hoffmann, Christin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Development of reporting guidance and core outcome sets for seamless, standardised evaluation of innovative surgical procedures and devices: a study protocol for content generation and a Delphi consensus process (COHESIVE study)
por: Avery, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Three nested RCTs of dual or single stakeholder feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set development
por: Brookes, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Outcome selection, measurement and reporting for new surgical procedures and devices: a systematic review of IDEAL/IDEAL‐D studies to inform development of a core outcome set
por: Macefield, R. C., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Three nested randomized controlled trials of peer-only or multiple stakeholder group feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set development
por: Brookes, Sara T., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

‘Trial Exegesis’: Methods for Synthesizing Clinical and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Data in Trials to Inform Clinical Practice. A Systematic Review
por: McNair, Angus G. K., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Incorporating patient reported outcomes (PROs) in gastro-intestinal (GI) cancer randomised controlled trials (RCTs): the need for adequate rationale and integrated reporting
por: Macefield, Rhiannon C, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Discussing surgical innovation with patients: a qualitative study of surgeons’ and governance representatives’ views
por: Zahra, Jesmond, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Investigating the collection and assessment of patient-reported outcome data amongst unplanned surgical hospital admissions: a feasibility study
por: Mason, John D, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Core outcomes for randomized trials and core information for clinical decision-making: implications for outcome selection
por: McNair, Angus, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Using qualitative research methods to understand how surgical procedures and devices are introduced into NHS hospitals: the Lotus study protocol
por: Elliott, Daisy, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

What Are Patients Told About Innovative Surgical Procedures? A Qualitative Synthesis of 7 Case Studies in the United Kingdom
por: Elliott, Daisy, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

What is the effect of patient-reported outcome (PRO) item order on prioritisation of PROs in the development of a core outcome set?
por: Chalmers, Katy, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The importance of stakeholder selection in core outcome set development: how surveying different health professionals may influence outcome selection
por: Avery, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Assessing the quality of written information provision for surgical procedures: a case study in oesophagectomy
por: Blencowe, N S, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

A Systematic Review of Patient-reported Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Unplanned General Surgery
por: Stevens, Daniel J., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Managing surgical demand when needs outstrip resource: qualitative investigation of colorectal cancer surgery provision in the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic
por: Conefrey, Carmel, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Development of a ‘universal-reporter’ outcome measure (UROM) for patient and healthcare professional completion: a mixed methods study demonstrating a novel concept for optimal questionnaire design
por: Macefield, Rhiannon, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Healthcare organization policy recommendations for the governance of surgical innovation: review of NHS policies
por: Cousins, Sian, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Core outcome set development: the effect of Delphi panel composition and feedback on prioritisation of outcomes
por: Macefield, Rhiannon, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Core information sets for informed consent to surgical interventions: baseline information of importance to patients and clinicians
por: Main, Barry G., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Development of a single, practical measure of surgical site infection (SSI) for patient self-report and observer completion: a novel method of questionnaire design
por: Macefield, Rhiannon, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Development of a single, practical measure of surgical site infection (SSI) for patient report or observer completion
por: Macefield, Rhiannon C, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Remote assessment of surgical site infection (SSI) using patient-taken wound images: Development and evaluation of a method for research and routine practice
por: Macefield, Rhiannon C., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Core Outcomes for Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Consensus Study
por: McNair, Angus G. K., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The case for a HRQL core outcome set: outcome reporting bias in oesophageal cancer studies
por: Macefield, Rhiannon C, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

A systematic scoping review protocol to summarise and appraise the use of artificial intelligence in the analysis of digital videos of invasive general surgical procedures
por: King, Anni, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Trial outcomes and information for clinical decision-making: a comparative study of opinions of health professionals
por: McNair, Angus G. K., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Post-mastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Development and Measurement Properties
por: Davies, C. F., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Selecting and measuring optimal outcomes for randomised controlled trials in surgery
por: Macefield, Rhiannon C., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Systematic review of the introduction and evaluation of magnetic augmentation of the lower oesophageal sphincter for gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease
por: Kirkham, E. N., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Development of a core information set for colorectal cancer surgery: a consensus study
por: McNair, Angus G K, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Value of surgical pilot and feasibility study protocols
por: Fairhurst, K., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Artificial intelligence as a diagnostic aid in cross-sectional radiological imaging of surgical pathology in the abdominopelvic cavity: a systematic review
por: Fowler, George E, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Methods for selecting health concepts and domains from in-depth qualitative interviews for the development of patient reported outcome measures (PROMS): a case study
por: Blazeby, Jane, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Methods for standardising and monitoring surgical interventions in RCTs
por: Blencowe, Natalie, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Development of a Core Outcome Set for Clinical Effectiveness Trials in Esophageal Cancer Resection Surgery
por: Avery, Kerry N. L., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_52il3iba1r7m6r57cq9cdcn2i7