Cargando…
Public opinion on sharing data from health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent: an anonymous online survey in the UK
OBJECTIVES: UK National Health Service/Health and Social Care (NHS/HSC) data are variably shared between healthcare organisations for direct care, and increasingly de-identified for research. Few large-scale studies have examined public opinion on sharing, including of mental health (MH) versus phys...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9058801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35477868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057579 |
_version_ | 1784698191442083840 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Linda A Nelder, Jenny R Fryer, Joseph M Alsop, Philip H Geary, Michael R Prince, Mark Cardinal, Rudolf N |
author_facet | Jones, Linda A Nelder, Jenny R Fryer, Joseph M Alsop, Philip H Geary, Michael R Prince, Mark Cardinal, Rudolf N |
author_sort | Jones, Linda A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: UK National Health Service/Health and Social Care (NHS/HSC) data are variably shared between healthcare organisations for direct care, and increasingly de-identified for research. Few large-scale studies have examined public opinion on sharing, including of mental health (MH) versus physical health (PH) data. We measured data sharing preferences. DESIGN/SETTING/INTERVENTIONS/OUTCOMES: Pre-registered anonymous online survey, measuring expressed preferences, recruiting February to September 2020. Participants were randomised to one of three framing statements regarding MH versus PH data. PARTICIPANTS: Open to all UK residents. Participants numbered 29 275; 40% had experienced an MH condition. RESULTS: Most (76%) supported identifiable data sharing for direct clinical care without explicit consent, but 20% opposed this. Preference for clinical/identifiable sharing decreased with geographical distance and was slightly less for MH than PH data, with small framing effects. Preference for research/de-identified data sharing without explicit consent showed the same small PH/MH and framing effects, plus greater preference for sharing structured data than de-identified free text. There was net support for research sharing to the NHS, academic institutions, and national research charities, net ambivalence about sharing to profit-making companies researching treatments, and net opposition to sharing to other companies (similar to sharing publicly). De-identified linkage to non-health data was generally supported, except to data held by private companies. We report demographic influences on preference. A majority (89%) supported a single NHS mechanism to choose uses of their data. Support for data sharing increased during COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Support for healthcare data sharing for direct care without explicit consent is broad but not universal. There is net support for the sharing of de-identified data for research to the NHS, academia, and the charitable sector, but not the commercial sector. A single national NHS-hosted system for patients to control the use of their NHS data for clinical purposes and for research would have broad support. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN37444142. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9058801 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90588012022-05-12 Public opinion on sharing data from health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent: an anonymous online survey in the UK Jones, Linda A Nelder, Jenny R Fryer, Joseph M Alsop, Philip H Geary, Michael R Prince, Mark Cardinal, Rudolf N BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVES: UK National Health Service/Health and Social Care (NHS/HSC) data are variably shared between healthcare organisations for direct care, and increasingly de-identified for research. Few large-scale studies have examined public opinion on sharing, including of mental health (MH) versus physical health (PH) data. We measured data sharing preferences. DESIGN/SETTING/INTERVENTIONS/OUTCOMES: Pre-registered anonymous online survey, measuring expressed preferences, recruiting February to September 2020. Participants were randomised to one of three framing statements regarding MH versus PH data. PARTICIPANTS: Open to all UK residents. Participants numbered 29 275; 40% had experienced an MH condition. RESULTS: Most (76%) supported identifiable data sharing for direct clinical care without explicit consent, but 20% opposed this. Preference for clinical/identifiable sharing decreased with geographical distance and was slightly less for MH than PH data, with small framing effects. Preference for research/de-identified data sharing without explicit consent showed the same small PH/MH and framing effects, plus greater preference for sharing structured data than de-identified free text. There was net support for research sharing to the NHS, academic institutions, and national research charities, net ambivalence about sharing to profit-making companies researching treatments, and net opposition to sharing to other companies (similar to sharing publicly). De-identified linkage to non-health data was generally supported, except to data held by private companies. We report demographic influences on preference. A majority (89%) supported a single NHS mechanism to choose uses of their data. Support for data sharing increased during COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Support for healthcare data sharing for direct care without explicit consent is broad but not universal. There is net support for the sharing of de-identified data for research to the NHS, academia, and the charitable sector, but not the commercial sector. A single national NHS-hosted system for patients to control the use of their NHS data for clinical purposes and for research would have broad support. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN37444142. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9058801/ /pubmed/35477868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057579 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Policy Jones, Linda A Nelder, Jenny R Fryer, Joseph M Alsop, Philip H Geary, Michael R Prince, Mark Cardinal, Rudolf N Public opinion on sharing data from health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent: an anonymous online survey in the UK |
title | Public opinion on sharing data from health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent: an anonymous online survey in the UK |
title_full | Public opinion on sharing data from health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent: an anonymous online survey in the UK |
title_fullStr | Public opinion on sharing data from health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent: an anonymous online survey in the UK |
title_full_unstemmed | Public opinion on sharing data from health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent: an anonymous online survey in the UK |
title_short | Public opinion on sharing data from health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent: an anonymous online survey in the UK |
title_sort | public opinion on sharing data from health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent: an anonymous online survey in the uk |
topic | Health Policy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9058801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35477868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057579 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joneslindaa publicopiniononsharingdatafromhealthservicesforclinicalandresearchpurposeswithoutexplicitconsentananonymousonlinesurveyintheuk AT nelderjennyr publicopiniononsharingdatafromhealthservicesforclinicalandresearchpurposeswithoutexplicitconsentananonymousonlinesurveyintheuk AT fryerjosephm publicopiniononsharingdatafromhealthservicesforclinicalandresearchpurposeswithoutexplicitconsentananonymousonlinesurveyintheuk AT alsopphiliph publicopiniononsharingdatafromhealthservicesforclinicalandresearchpurposeswithoutexplicitconsentananonymousonlinesurveyintheuk AT gearymichaelr publicopiniononsharingdatafromhealthservicesforclinicalandresearchpurposeswithoutexplicitconsentananonymousonlinesurveyintheuk AT princemark publicopiniononsharingdatafromhealthservicesforclinicalandresearchpurposeswithoutexplicitconsentananonymousonlinesurveyintheuk AT cardinalrudolfn publicopiniononsharingdatafromhealthservicesforclinicalandresearchpurposeswithoutexplicitconsentananonymousonlinesurveyintheuk |