Cargando…
Systematic interpretation of confocal laser endomicroscopy: larynx and pharynx confocal imaging score
OBJECTIVE: Development and validation of a confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) classification score for the larynx and pharynx. METHODS: Thirteen patients (154 video sequences, 9240 images) with laryngeal or pharyngeal SCC were included in this prospective study between October 2020 and February 202...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pacini Editore Srl
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9058938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35129541 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N1643 |
_version_ | 1784698220469813248 |
---|---|
author | Sievert, Matti Mantsopoulos, Konstantinos Mueller, Sarina K. Eckstein, Markus Rupp, Robin Aubreville, Marc Stelzle, Florian Oetter, Nicolai Maier, Andreas Iro, Heinrich Goncalves, Miguel |
author_facet | Sievert, Matti Mantsopoulos, Konstantinos Mueller, Sarina K. Eckstein, Markus Rupp, Robin Aubreville, Marc Stelzle, Florian Oetter, Nicolai Maier, Andreas Iro, Heinrich Goncalves, Miguel |
author_sort | Sievert, Matti |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Development and validation of a confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) classification score for the larynx and pharynx. METHODS: Thirteen patients (154 video sequences, 9240 images) with laryngeal or pharyngeal SCC were included in this prospective study between October 2020 and February 2021. Each CLE sequence was correlated with the gold standard of histopathological examination. Based on a dataset of 94 video sequences (5640 images), a scoring system was developed. In the remaining 60 sequences (3600 images), the score was validated by four CLE experts and four head and neck surgeons who were not familiar with CLE. RESULTS: Tissue homogeneity, cell size, borders and clusters, capillary loops and the nucleus/cytoplasm ratio were defined as the scoring criteria. Using this score, the CLE experts obtained an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 90.8%, 95.1%, and 86.4%, respectively, and the CLE non-experts of 86.2%, 86.4%, and 86.1%. Interobserver agreement Fleiss’ kappa was 0.8 and 0.6, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CLE can be reliably evaluated based on defined and reproducible imaging features, which demonstrate a high diagnostic value. CLE can be easily integrated into the intraoperative setting and generate real-time, in-vivo microscopic images to demarcate malignant changes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9058938 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Pacini Editore Srl |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90589382022-05-10 Systematic interpretation of confocal laser endomicroscopy: larynx and pharynx confocal imaging score Sievert, Matti Mantsopoulos, Konstantinos Mueller, Sarina K. Eckstein, Markus Rupp, Robin Aubreville, Marc Stelzle, Florian Oetter, Nicolai Maier, Andreas Iro, Heinrich Goncalves, Miguel Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Head and Neck OBJECTIVE: Development and validation of a confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) classification score for the larynx and pharynx. METHODS: Thirteen patients (154 video sequences, 9240 images) with laryngeal or pharyngeal SCC were included in this prospective study between October 2020 and February 2021. Each CLE sequence was correlated with the gold standard of histopathological examination. Based on a dataset of 94 video sequences (5640 images), a scoring system was developed. In the remaining 60 sequences (3600 images), the score was validated by four CLE experts and four head and neck surgeons who were not familiar with CLE. RESULTS: Tissue homogeneity, cell size, borders and clusters, capillary loops and the nucleus/cytoplasm ratio were defined as the scoring criteria. Using this score, the CLE experts obtained an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 90.8%, 95.1%, and 86.4%, respectively, and the CLE non-experts of 86.2%, 86.4%, and 86.1%. Interobserver agreement Fleiss’ kappa was 0.8 and 0.6, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CLE can be reliably evaluated based on defined and reproducible imaging features, which demonstrate a high diagnostic value. CLE can be easily integrated into the intraoperative setting and generate real-time, in-vivo microscopic images to demarcate malignant changes. Pacini Editore Srl 2022-02-07 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9058938/ /pubmed/35129541 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N1643 Text en Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale, Rome, Italy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the CC-BY-NC-ND (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International) license. The article can be used by giving appropriate credit and mentioning the license, but only for non-commercial purposes and only in the original version. For further information: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en |
spellingShingle | Head and Neck Sievert, Matti Mantsopoulos, Konstantinos Mueller, Sarina K. Eckstein, Markus Rupp, Robin Aubreville, Marc Stelzle, Florian Oetter, Nicolai Maier, Andreas Iro, Heinrich Goncalves, Miguel Systematic interpretation of confocal laser endomicroscopy: larynx and pharynx confocal imaging score |
title | Systematic interpretation of confocal laser endomicroscopy: larynx and pharynx confocal imaging score |
title_full | Systematic interpretation of confocal laser endomicroscopy: larynx and pharynx confocal imaging score |
title_fullStr | Systematic interpretation of confocal laser endomicroscopy: larynx and pharynx confocal imaging score |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic interpretation of confocal laser endomicroscopy: larynx and pharynx confocal imaging score |
title_short | Systematic interpretation of confocal laser endomicroscopy: larynx and pharynx confocal imaging score |
title_sort | systematic interpretation of confocal laser endomicroscopy: larynx and pharynx confocal imaging score |
topic | Head and Neck |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9058938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35129541 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N1643 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sievertmatti systematicinterpretationofconfocallaserendomicroscopylarynxandpharynxconfocalimagingscore AT mantsopouloskonstantinos systematicinterpretationofconfocallaserendomicroscopylarynxandpharynxconfocalimagingscore AT muellersarinak systematicinterpretationofconfocallaserendomicroscopylarynxandpharynxconfocalimagingscore AT ecksteinmarkus systematicinterpretationofconfocallaserendomicroscopylarynxandpharynxconfocalimagingscore AT rupprobin systematicinterpretationofconfocallaserendomicroscopylarynxandpharynxconfocalimagingscore AT aubrevillemarc systematicinterpretationofconfocallaserendomicroscopylarynxandpharynxconfocalimagingscore AT stelzleflorian systematicinterpretationofconfocallaserendomicroscopylarynxandpharynxconfocalimagingscore AT oetternicolai systematicinterpretationofconfocallaserendomicroscopylarynxandpharynxconfocalimagingscore AT maierandreas systematicinterpretationofconfocallaserendomicroscopylarynxandpharynxconfocalimagingscore AT iroheinrich systematicinterpretationofconfocallaserendomicroscopylarynxandpharynxconfocalimagingscore AT goncalvesmiguel systematicinterpretationofconfocallaserendomicroscopylarynxandpharynxconfocalimagingscore |