Cargando…

Does stereotactic body radiation improve outcomes compared to conventional radiation for liver cancer patients?

INTRODUCTION: Over the past decade, there has been a paradigm shift to higher doses per fraction of liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). However, this shift may not be due to evidence alone, but rather result of convenience and remuneration. This prospective cohort study aims to compare outc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lock, Michael, Chow, Ronald, Jayatilaka, Aruni, Plotnick, Meghan, Stephens, Robert, Nguyen, Timothy, Fisher, Barbara, Wong, Eugene, Gaede, Steward
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9058945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35510143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2022.04.002
_version_ 1784698221416677376
author Lock, Michael
Chow, Ronald
Jayatilaka, Aruni
Plotnick, Meghan
Stephens, Robert
Nguyen, Timothy
Fisher, Barbara
Wong, Eugene
Gaede, Steward
author_facet Lock, Michael
Chow, Ronald
Jayatilaka, Aruni
Plotnick, Meghan
Stephens, Robert
Nguyen, Timothy
Fisher, Barbara
Wong, Eugene
Gaede, Steward
author_sort Lock, Michael
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Over the past decade, there has been a paradigm shift to higher doses per fraction of liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). However, this shift may not be due to evidence alone, but rather result of convenience and remuneration. This prospective cohort study aims to compare outcomes of patients who received moderately hypofractionated and hypofractionated radiotherapy treatments for liver tumours. METHODS: Patients treated for liver cancer with radiotherapy between 2004 and 2020 were prospectively entered in this study. Patients were stratified into two groups: hypofractionation group of patients receiving an average of 5 fractions, and moderate hypofractionation group of patients receiving an average of 17 fractions. Other components of precision radiotherapy such as image guidance were the same between groups. The primary outcome was 2-year overall survival. The secondary outcomes were (1) change in toxicity as assessed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) toxicity criteria from baseline to 3 months, and from baseline to 6 months; and (2) change in Child Pugh score from baseline to 3 months. Type I error was prespecified at 0.05. RESULTS: 397 patients were included. A larger proportion of patients on hypofractionated regimens were alive at the 2-year time point, relative to those who received moderately hypofractionated regimens (42% vs 27% p = 0.010); no difference was noted at the 1-year time point. Mean toxicity change in RTOG symptoms from baseline to 3 and 6 months, and in Child Pugh score from baseline to 3 months, were not statistically different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: When compared to conventional radiation fractionation, liver SBRT tends to be associated with a significant overall survival benefit, justifying a randomized trial to confirm. The concern that the trend to higher dose per fraction may result in increased toxicity, specifically in the treatment of high-risk liver patients, appears to be unfounded. The hypofractionated component of SBRT may be the critical dosimetric factor impacting on survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9058945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90589452022-05-03 Does stereotactic body radiation improve outcomes compared to conventional radiation for liver cancer patients? Lock, Michael Chow, Ronald Jayatilaka, Aruni Plotnick, Meghan Stephens, Robert Nguyen, Timothy Fisher, Barbara Wong, Eugene Gaede, Steward Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: Over the past decade, there has been a paradigm shift to higher doses per fraction of liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). However, this shift may not be due to evidence alone, but rather result of convenience and remuneration. This prospective cohort study aims to compare outcomes of patients who received moderately hypofractionated and hypofractionated radiotherapy treatments for liver tumours. METHODS: Patients treated for liver cancer with radiotherapy between 2004 and 2020 were prospectively entered in this study. Patients were stratified into two groups: hypofractionation group of patients receiving an average of 5 fractions, and moderate hypofractionation group of patients receiving an average of 17 fractions. Other components of precision radiotherapy such as image guidance were the same between groups. The primary outcome was 2-year overall survival. The secondary outcomes were (1) change in toxicity as assessed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) toxicity criteria from baseline to 3 months, and from baseline to 6 months; and (2) change in Child Pugh score from baseline to 3 months. Type I error was prespecified at 0.05. RESULTS: 397 patients were included. A larger proportion of patients on hypofractionated regimens were alive at the 2-year time point, relative to those who received moderately hypofractionated regimens (42% vs 27% p = 0.010); no difference was noted at the 1-year time point. Mean toxicity change in RTOG symptoms from baseline to 3 and 6 months, and in Child Pugh score from baseline to 3 months, were not statistically different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: When compared to conventional radiation fractionation, liver SBRT tends to be associated with a significant overall survival benefit, justifying a randomized trial to confirm. The concern that the trend to higher dose per fraction may result in increased toxicity, specifically in the treatment of high-risk liver patients, appears to be unfounded. The hypofractionated component of SBRT may be the critical dosimetric factor impacting on survival. Elsevier 2022-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9058945/ /pubmed/35510143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2022.04.002 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Lock, Michael
Chow, Ronald
Jayatilaka, Aruni
Plotnick, Meghan
Stephens, Robert
Nguyen, Timothy
Fisher, Barbara
Wong, Eugene
Gaede, Steward
Does stereotactic body radiation improve outcomes compared to conventional radiation for liver cancer patients?
title Does stereotactic body radiation improve outcomes compared to conventional radiation for liver cancer patients?
title_full Does stereotactic body radiation improve outcomes compared to conventional radiation for liver cancer patients?
title_fullStr Does stereotactic body radiation improve outcomes compared to conventional radiation for liver cancer patients?
title_full_unstemmed Does stereotactic body radiation improve outcomes compared to conventional radiation for liver cancer patients?
title_short Does stereotactic body radiation improve outcomes compared to conventional radiation for liver cancer patients?
title_sort does stereotactic body radiation improve outcomes compared to conventional radiation for liver cancer patients?
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9058945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35510143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2022.04.002
work_keys_str_mv AT lockmichael doesstereotacticbodyradiationimproveoutcomescomparedtoconventionalradiationforlivercancerpatients
AT chowronald doesstereotacticbodyradiationimproveoutcomescomparedtoconventionalradiationforlivercancerpatients
AT jayatilakaaruni doesstereotacticbodyradiationimproveoutcomescomparedtoconventionalradiationforlivercancerpatients
AT plotnickmeghan doesstereotacticbodyradiationimproveoutcomescomparedtoconventionalradiationforlivercancerpatients
AT stephensrobert doesstereotacticbodyradiationimproveoutcomescomparedtoconventionalradiationforlivercancerpatients
AT nguyentimothy doesstereotacticbodyradiationimproveoutcomescomparedtoconventionalradiationforlivercancerpatients
AT fisherbarbara doesstereotacticbodyradiationimproveoutcomescomparedtoconventionalradiationforlivercancerpatients
AT wongeugene doesstereotacticbodyradiationimproveoutcomescomparedtoconventionalradiationforlivercancerpatients
AT gaedesteward doesstereotacticbodyradiationimproveoutcomescomparedtoconventionalradiationforlivercancerpatients