Cargando…

Risk of COVID-19 in Health Professionals: A Case-Control Study, Portugal

INTRODUCTION: Health professionals face higher occupational exposure to SARS-CoV-2. We aimed to estimate the risk of COVID-19 test positivity in health professionals compared to non-health professionals. METHODS: We conducted a test-negative case-control study using Portuguese national surveillance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lucaccioni, Héloïse, Costa, Cristina, Duque, Mariana Perez, Balasegaram, Sooria, Sá Machado, Rita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9059035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37753314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000519472
_version_ 1784698233306480640
author Lucaccioni, Héloïse
Costa, Cristina
Duque, Mariana Perez
Balasegaram, Sooria
Sá Machado, Rita
author_facet Lucaccioni, Héloïse
Costa, Cristina
Duque, Mariana Perez
Balasegaram, Sooria
Sá Machado, Rita
author_sort Lucaccioni, Héloïse
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Health professionals face higher occupational exposure to SARS-CoV-2. We aimed to estimate the risk of COVID-19 test positivity in health professionals compared to non-health professionals. METHODS: We conducted a test-negative case-control study using Portuguese national surveillance data (January to May 2020). Cases were suspected cases who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2; controls were suspected cases who tested negative. We used multivariable logistic regression modelling to estimate the odds ratio of a positive COVID-19 test (RT-PCR; primary outcome), comparing health professionals and non-health professionals (primary exposure), and adjusting for the confounding effect of demographic, clinical, and epidemiological characteristics, and the modification effect of the self-reported epidemiological link (i.e., self-reported contact with a COVID-19 case or person with COVID-19-like symptoms). RESULTS: Health professionals had a 2-fold higher risk of a positive COVID-19 test result (aOR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.69–2.11). However, this association was strongly modified by the self-report of an epidemiological link such that, among cases who did report an epidemiological link, being a health professional was a protective factor (aOR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.82–0.98). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that health professionals might be primarily infected by unknown contacts, plausibly in the healthcare setting, but also that their occupational exposure does not systematically translate into a higher risk of transmission. We suggest that this could be interpreted in light of different types and timing of exposure, and variability in risk perception and associated preventive behaviours.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9059035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90590352022-05-03 Risk of COVID-19 in Health Professionals: A Case-Control Study, Portugal Lucaccioni, Héloïse Costa, Cristina Duque, Mariana Perez Balasegaram, Sooria Sá Machado, Rita Portuguese Journal of Public Health Research Article INTRODUCTION: Health professionals face higher occupational exposure to SARS-CoV-2. We aimed to estimate the risk of COVID-19 test positivity in health professionals compared to non-health professionals. METHODS: We conducted a test-negative case-control study using Portuguese national surveillance data (January to May 2020). Cases were suspected cases who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2; controls were suspected cases who tested negative. We used multivariable logistic regression modelling to estimate the odds ratio of a positive COVID-19 test (RT-PCR; primary outcome), comparing health professionals and non-health professionals (primary exposure), and adjusting for the confounding effect of demographic, clinical, and epidemiological characteristics, and the modification effect of the self-reported epidemiological link (i.e., self-reported contact with a COVID-19 case or person with COVID-19-like symptoms). RESULTS: Health professionals had a 2-fold higher risk of a positive COVID-19 test result (aOR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.69–2.11). However, this association was strongly modified by the self-report of an epidemiological link such that, among cases who did report an epidemiological link, being a health professional was a protective factor (aOR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.82–0.98). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that health professionals might be primarily infected by unknown contacts, plausibly in the healthcare setting, but also that their occupational exposure does not systematically translate into a higher risk of transmission. We suggest that this could be interpreted in light of different types and timing of exposure, and variability in risk perception and associated preventive behaviours. S. Karger AG 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9059035/ /pubmed/37753314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000519472 Text en Copyright © 2022 by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lucaccioni, Héloïse
Costa, Cristina
Duque, Mariana Perez
Balasegaram, Sooria
Sá Machado, Rita
Risk of COVID-19 in Health Professionals: A Case-Control Study, Portugal
title Risk of COVID-19 in Health Professionals: A Case-Control Study, Portugal
title_full Risk of COVID-19 in Health Professionals: A Case-Control Study, Portugal
title_fullStr Risk of COVID-19 in Health Professionals: A Case-Control Study, Portugal
title_full_unstemmed Risk of COVID-19 in Health Professionals: A Case-Control Study, Portugal
title_short Risk of COVID-19 in Health Professionals: A Case-Control Study, Portugal
title_sort risk of covid-19 in health professionals: a case-control study, portugal
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9059035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37753314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000519472
work_keys_str_mv AT lucaccioniheloise riskofcovid19inhealthprofessionalsacasecontrolstudyportugal
AT costacristina riskofcovid19inhealthprofessionalsacasecontrolstudyportugal
AT duquemarianaperez riskofcovid19inhealthprofessionalsacasecontrolstudyportugal
AT balasegaramsooria riskofcovid19inhealthprofessionalsacasecontrolstudyportugal
AT samachadorita riskofcovid19inhealthprofessionalsacasecontrolstudyportugal