Cargando…

Speaking up or remaining silent about patient safety concerns in rehabilitation: A cross‐sectional survey to assess staff experiences and perceptions

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patient safety incidents may be prevented if healthcare workers speak up to voice their concerns when they observe hazardous clinical situations. This study aims to investigate the frequency of speaking up and healthcare workers' perception of organizational climate in reha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niederhauser, Andrea, Schwappach, David L. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9059171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35509405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.631
_version_ 1784698256203186176
author Niederhauser, Andrea
Schwappach, David L. B.
author_facet Niederhauser, Andrea
Schwappach, David L. B.
author_sort Niederhauser, Andrea
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patient safety incidents may be prevented if healthcare workers speak up to voice their concerns when they observe hazardous clinical situations. This study aims to investigate the frequency of speaking up and healthcare workers' perception of organizational climate in rehabilitation clinics. METHODS: An online survey was conducted in five rehabilitation clinics. An existing survey instrument (Speaking Up About Patient Safety Questionnaire [SUPS‐Q]) was adapted for this purpose. The instrument includes items on self‐reported speak‐up‐related behavior (perceived safety concerns, withholding voice, and speaking up), anticipated speak‐up behavior, barriers to speaking up, and speak‐up‐related climate measures (psychological safety, encouraging environment, and resignation). Data analysis included descriptive statistics, one‐way analysis of variance for differences between groups, multiple regression, and measures for validity and reliability of the scales. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy‐one individuals participated in the survey (response rate of 32%). In the 4 weeks preceding the survey, 81% of respondents had specific concerns about patient safety, 83% performed speak up and 41% remained silent in one or more instances. Expected differences between professional groups were confirmed, but surprisingly, we found no effect of hierarchical level on speaking up behavior and perception of the speak‐up climate. Factors that most frequently prevented healthcare workers from speaking up were ineffectiveness (38%), presence of patients (26%), and unpredictability of the actor's reaction (25%). The psychometric evaluation of the adapted SUPS‐Q showed acceptable results for validity and reliability. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare workers in rehabilitation clinics frequently perceive safety concerns. The study underlines the importance of promoting a culture of safety and speaking up. The short survey instrument SUPS‐Q can be used by rehabilitation clinics to initiate discussions related to facilitators and barriers to speaking up and to identify areas for improvement within the organization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9059171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90591712022-05-03 Speaking up or remaining silent about patient safety concerns in rehabilitation: A cross‐sectional survey to assess staff experiences and perceptions Niederhauser, Andrea Schwappach, David L. B. Health Sci Rep Original Research BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patient safety incidents may be prevented if healthcare workers speak up to voice their concerns when they observe hazardous clinical situations. This study aims to investigate the frequency of speaking up and healthcare workers' perception of organizational climate in rehabilitation clinics. METHODS: An online survey was conducted in five rehabilitation clinics. An existing survey instrument (Speaking Up About Patient Safety Questionnaire [SUPS‐Q]) was adapted for this purpose. The instrument includes items on self‐reported speak‐up‐related behavior (perceived safety concerns, withholding voice, and speaking up), anticipated speak‐up behavior, barriers to speaking up, and speak‐up‐related climate measures (psychological safety, encouraging environment, and resignation). Data analysis included descriptive statistics, one‐way analysis of variance for differences between groups, multiple regression, and measures for validity and reliability of the scales. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy‐one individuals participated in the survey (response rate of 32%). In the 4 weeks preceding the survey, 81% of respondents had specific concerns about patient safety, 83% performed speak up and 41% remained silent in one or more instances. Expected differences between professional groups were confirmed, but surprisingly, we found no effect of hierarchical level on speaking up behavior and perception of the speak‐up climate. Factors that most frequently prevented healthcare workers from speaking up were ineffectiveness (38%), presence of patients (26%), and unpredictability of the actor's reaction (25%). The psychometric evaluation of the adapted SUPS‐Q showed acceptable results for validity and reliability. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare workers in rehabilitation clinics frequently perceive safety concerns. The study underlines the importance of promoting a culture of safety and speaking up. The short survey instrument SUPS‐Q can be used by rehabilitation clinics to initiate discussions related to facilitators and barriers to speaking up and to identify areas for improvement within the organization. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9059171/ /pubmed/35509405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.631 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Niederhauser, Andrea
Schwappach, David L. B.
Speaking up or remaining silent about patient safety concerns in rehabilitation: A cross‐sectional survey to assess staff experiences and perceptions
title Speaking up or remaining silent about patient safety concerns in rehabilitation: A cross‐sectional survey to assess staff experiences and perceptions
title_full Speaking up or remaining silent about patient safety concerns in rehabilitation: A cross‐sectional survey to assess staff experiences and perceptions
title_fullStr Speaking up or remaining silent about patient safety concerns in rehabilitation: A cross‐sectional survey to assess staff experiences and perceptions
title_full_unstemmed Speaking up or remaining silent about patient safety concerns in rehabilitation: A cross‐sectional survey to assess staff experiences and perceptions
title_short Speaking up or remaining silent about patient safety concerns in rehabilitation: A cross‐sectional survey to assess staff experiences and perceptions
title_sort speaking up or remaining silent about patient safety concerns in rehabilitation: a cross‐sectional survey to assess staff experiences and perceptions
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9059171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35509405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.631
work_keys_str_mv AT niederhauserandrea speakinguporremainingsilentaboutpatientsafetyconcernsinrehabilitationacrosssectionalsurveytoassessstaffexperiencesandperceptions
AT schwappachdavidlb speakinguporremainingsilentaboutpatientsafetyconcernsinrehabilitationacrosssectionalsurveytoassessstaffexperiencesandperceptions