Cargando…
Conversion from Spanning External Fixation to Open Reduction Internal Fixation Contributes to Healing of Soft Tissues and Fractures in Open Distal Humeral Fractures
BACKGROUND: Open distal humeral fractures (DHFs) often lead to loss of elbow function, thereby seriously affecting patient quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcomes of 2 surgical techniques to determine the better method for repairing open DHFs. Both groups were t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9059528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35246502 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.934488 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Open distal humeral fractures (DHFs) often lead to loss of elbow function, thereby seriously affecting patient quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcomes of 2 surgical techniques to determine the better method for repairing open DHFs. Both groups were treated with immediate debridement first, and then group I had only internal fixation (IF), while group II underwent initial external fixation (EF) followed by IF surgery. MATERIAL/METHODS: This retrospective study included 32 patients who had open DHFs between 2013 and 2018. Twelve patients underwent thorough debridement and temporary EF treatment and converted to IF as the ultimate treatment. Twenty patients were treated with immediate open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Data of final treatment outcomes were analyzed at the latest follow-up. A comparative analysis of radiological results, function observations, and complications was performed for the 2 surgical groups. RESULTS: All DHFs and osteotomized olecranon united after a mean of 5.2±1.21 months. No significant differences were observed in other preoperative demographic data between the 2 groups. Moreover, there was no significant difference in postoperative complications, elbow range of motion, or fracture healing time between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence provided by our study highlights the efficacy of definitive IF in treating open DHFs, which is recommended whenever possible. Furthermore, the combination of EF and ORIF, according to the type of soft tissue damage, may be a promising treatment option with a low revision rate for patients with open DHFs. |
---|