Cargando…

Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial

Repeated sessions of cerebellar anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been suggested to modulate cerebellar-motor cortex (M1) connectivity and decrease ataxia severity. However, therapeutic trials involving etiologically homogeneous groups of ataxia patients are lacking. The obj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maas, Roderick P. P. W. M., Teerenstra, Steven, Toni, Ivan, Klockgether, Thomas, Schutter, Dennis J. L. G., van de Warrenburg, Bart P. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9059914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35501469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13311-022-01231-w
_version_ 1784698406079299584
author Maas, Roderick P. P. W. M.
Teerenstra, Steven
Toni, Ivan
Klockgether, Thomas
Schutter, Dennis J. L. G.
van de Warrenburg, Bart P. C.
author_facet Maas, Roderick P. P. W. M.
Teerenstra, Steven
Toni, Ivan
Klockgether, Thomas
Schutter, Dennis J. L. G.
van de Warrenburg, Bart P. C.
author_sort Maas, Roderick P. P. W. M.
collection PubMed
description Repeated sessions of cerebellar anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been suggested to modulate cerebellar-motor cortex (M1) connectivity and decrease ataxia severity. However, therapeutic trials involving etiologically homogeneous groups of ataxia patients are lacking. The objective of this study was to investigate if a two-week regimen of daily cerebellar tDCS sessions diminishes ataxia and non-motor symptom severity and alters cerebellar-M1 connectivity in individuals with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3). We conducted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in which twenty mildly to moderately affected SCA3 patients received ten sessions of real or sham cerebellar tDCS (i.e., five days per week for two consecutive weeks). Effects were evaluated after two weeks, three months, six months, and twelve months. Change in Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) score after two weeks was defined as the primary endpoint. Static posturography, SCA Functional Index tests, various patient-reported outcome measures, the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome scale, and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to examine cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI) served as secondary endpoints. Absolute change in SARA score did not differ between both trial arms at any of the time points. We observed significant short-term improvements in several motor, cognitive, and patient-reported outcomes after the last stimulation session in both groups but no treatment effects in favor of real tDCS. Nonetheless, some of the patients in the intervention arm showed a sustained reduction in SARA score lasting six or even twelve months, indicating interindividual variability in treatment response. CBI, which reflects the functional integrity of the cerebellothalamocortical tract, remained unchanged after ten tDCS sessions. Albeit exploratory, there was some indication for between-group differences in SARA speech score after six and twelve months and in the number of extracerebellar signs after three and six months. Taken together, our study does not provide evidence that a two-week treatment with daily cerebellar tDCS sessions reduces ataxia severity or restores cerebellar-M1 connectivity in early-to-middle-stage SCA3 patients at the group level. In order to potentially increase therapeutic efficacy, further research is warranted to identify individual predictors of symptomatic improvement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13311-022-01231-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9059914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90599142022-05-03 Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial Maas, Roderick P. P. W. M. Teerenstra, Steven Toni, Ivan Klockgether, Thomas Schutter, Dennis J. L. G. van de Warrenburg, Bart P. C. Neurotherapeutics Original Article Repeated sessions of cerebellar anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been suggested to modulate cerebellar-motor cortex (M1) connectivity and decrease ataxia severity. However, therapeutic trials involving etiologically homogeneous groups of ataxia patients are lacking. The objective of this study was to investigate if a two-week regimen of daily cerebellar tDCS sessions diminishes ataxia and non-motor symptom severity and alters cerebellar-M1 connectivity in individuals with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3). We conducted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in which twenty mildly to moderately affected SCA3 patients received ten sessions of real or sham cerebellar tDCS (i.e., five days per week for two consecutive weeks). Effects were evaluated after two weeks, three months, six months, and twelve months. Change in Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) score after two weeks was defined as the primary endpoint. Static posturography, SCA Functional Index tests, various patient-reported outcome measures, the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome scale, and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to examine cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI) served as secondary endpoints. Absolute change in SARA score did not differ between both trial arms at any of the time points. We observed significant short-term improvements in several motor, cognitive, and patient-reported outcomes after the last stimulation session in both groups but no treatment effects in favor of real tDCS. Nonetheless, some of the patients in the intervention arm showed a sustained reduction in SARA score lasting six or even twelve months, indicating interindividual variability in treatment response. CBI, which reflects the functional integrity of the cerebellothalamocortical tract, remained unchanged after ten tDCS sessions. Albeit exploratory, there was some indication for between-group differences in SARA speech score after six and twelve months and in the number of extracerebellar signs after three and six months. Taken together, our study does not provide evidence that a two-week treatment with daily cerebellar tDCS sessions reduces ataxia severity or restores cerebellar-M1 connectivity in early-to-middle-stage SCA3 patients at the group level. In order to potentially increase therapeutic efficacy, further research is warranted to identify individual predictors of symptomatic improvement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13311-022-01231-w. Springer International Publishing 2022-05-02 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9059914/ /pubmed/35501469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13311-022-01231-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Maas, Roderick P. P. W. M.
Teerenstra, Steven
Toni, Ivan
Klockgether, Thomas
Schutter, Dennis J. L. G.
van de Warrenburg, Bart P. C.
Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial
title Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial
title_full Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial
title_short Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial
title_sort cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9059914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35501469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13311-022-01231-w
work_keys_str_mv AT maasroderickppwm cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinspinocerebellarataxiatype3arandomizeddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT teerenstrasteven cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinspinocerebellarataxiatype3arandomizeddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT toniivan cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinspinocerebellarataxiatype3arandomizeddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT klockgetherthomas cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinspinocerebellarataxiatype3arandomizeddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT schutterdennisjlg cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinspinocerebellarataxiatype3arandomizeddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT vandewarrenburgbartpc cerebellartranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinspinocerebellarataxiatype3arandomizeddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial