Mepolizumab improves work productivity, activity limitation, symptoms, and rescue medication use in severe eosinophilic asthma

Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma experience daily activity limitations and reduced productivity at work. Using anonymized individual patient‐level data from two previously conducted randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled studies (MENSA [GSK ID:115588/NCT01691521]; MUSCA [GSK ID:200862/NCT02281318]), we investigated the effect of mepolizumab on work productivity, activity limitation, symptoms, and rescue medication use. Patient‐reported outcomes including Work Productivity and Activity Impairment–General Health (WPAI‐GH) scores (impairment percentages, 0%–100%), global activity limitation (scale 1–4), and perceived change in activity limitation (Likert scale 1–7) since the start of the study were analyzed. WPAI‐GH scores from MENSA were analyzed post hoc for employed patients using mixed model repeated measures; global activity limitation and perceived change in activity limitation from MUSCA were analyzed by ordinal logistic regression. Mean changes from baseline in daily asthma symptom scores (scale 0–5) and rescue medication use (occasions/day) were also assessed, via a post hoc meta‐analysis of MENSA and MUSCA. At study end, WPAI‐GH scores indicative of overall work impairment, impairment while working, and activity impairment consistently improved with mepolizumab versus placebo. Overall, 76% versus 54% of patients rated their activity as “much better,” “better,” or “slightly better” since the start of the study with mepolizumab versus placebo. Mepolizumab was associated with numerically larger improvements from baseline in asthma symptoms (treatment difference 0.21–0.29 points) and rescue medication use (treatment difference −0.08 to −0.22 occasions/day) versus placebo. Our results indicate that patients with severe eosinophilic asthma may experience improved activity limitation, work productivity, symptoms, and rescue medication use with mepolizumab.