Cargando…

Comparison of performance and biofouling resistance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes with substrate/active layer modified by graphene oxide

In this study, the influence mechanisms of graphene oxide (GO) on the membrane substrate/active layer for improving the water flux and anti-biofouling ability of thin-film composite (TFC) membranes in forward osmosis (FO) were systematically investigated. We fabricated a pristine TFC membrane, a TFC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yuan, Yang, Yu, Li, Chen, Hou, Li-an
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9060938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35518494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8ra08838a
_version_ 1784698616208687104
author Li, Yuan
Yang, Yu
Li, Chen
Hou, Li-an
author_facet Li, Yuan
Yang, Yu
Li, Chen
Hou, Li-an
author_sort Li, Yuan
collection PubMed
description In this study, the influence mechanisms of graphene oxide (GO) on the membrane substrate/active layer for improving the water flux and anti-biofouling ability of thin-film composite (TFC) membranes in forward osmosis (FO) were systematically investigated. We fabricated a pristine TFC membrane, a TFC membrane in which the substrate or polyamide active layer was modified by GO (TFN-S membrane or TFN-A membrane), and a TFC membrane in which both the substrate and active layer were functionalized by GO (TFN-S + A membrane). Our results showed that the TFN-S membrane possesses a higher water flux (∼27.2%) than the TFN-A because the substrate that contained GO could improve the porous structure and porosity, while the TFN-A membrane exhibited a lower reverse salt flux and higher salt rejection than the TFN-S membrane, indicating that the surface properties played a more important role than the substrate for the salt rejection. Regarding the biofouling experiment, the TFN-A and TFN-S + A membranes facilitated a higher antifouling performance than the TFN-S and TFC membranes after 72 h of operation because of the greater hydrophilicity, lower roughness and facilitated higher bactericidal activity on the GO-modified surface. In addition, the biovolume and biofilm thickness of the TFN-A and TFN-S + A membranes were found to follow the same trend as flux decline performance. In conclusion, the substrate modified by GO could greatly improve the water flux, whereas the GO-functionalized active layer is favorable for salt rejection and biofouling mitigation. The advantage of TFN-A in biofouling mitigation suggests that the antibacterial effect of GO has a stronger influence on biofouling control than the changes of hydrophilicity and roughness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9060938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90609382022-05-04 Comparison of performance and biofouling resistance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes with substrate/active layer modified by graphene oxide Li, Yuan Yang, Yu Li, Chen Hou, Li-an RSC Adv Chemistry In this study, the influence mechanisms of graphene oxide (GO) on the membrane substrate/active layer for improving the water flux and anti-biofouling ability of thin-film composite (TFC) membranes in forward osmosis (FO) were systematically investigated. We fabricated a pristine TFC membrane, a TFC membrane in which the substrate or polyamide active layer was modified by GO (TFN-S membrane or TFN-A membrane), and a TFC membrane in which both the substrate and active layer were functionalized by GO (TFN-S + A membrane). Our results showed that the TFN-S membrane possesses a higher water flux (∼27.2%) than the TFN-A because the substrate that contained GO could improve the porous structure and porosity, while the TFN-A membrane exhibited a lower reverse salt flux and higher salt rejection than the TFN-S membrane, indicating that the surface properties played a more important role than the substrate for the salt rejection. Regarding the biofouling experiment, the TFN-A and TFN-S + A membranes facilitated a higher antifouling performance than the TFN-S and TFC membranes after 72 h of operation because of the greater hydrophilicity, lower roughness and facilitated higher bactericidal activity on the GO-modified surface. In addition, the biovolume and biofilm thickness of the TFN-A and TFN-S + A membranes were found to follow the same trend as flux decline performance. In conclusion, the substrate modified by GO could greatly improve the water flux, whereas the GO-functionalized active layer is favorable for salt rejection and biofouling mitigation. The advantage of TFN-A in biofouling mitigation suggests that the antibacterial effect of GO has a stronger influence on biofouling control than the changes of hydrophilicity and roughness. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9060938/ /pubmed/35518494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8ra08838a Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Li, Yuan
Yang, Yu
Li, Chen
Hou, Li-an
Comparison of performance and biofouling resistance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes with substrate/active layer modified by graphene oxide
title Comparison of performance and biofouling resistance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes with substrate/active layer modified by graphene oxide
title_full Comparison of performance and biofouling resistance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes with substrate/active layer modified by graphene oxide
title_fullStr Comparison of performance and biofouling resistance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes with substrate/active layer modified by graphene oxide
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of performance and biofouling resistance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes with substrate/active layer modified by graphene oxide
title_short Comparison of performance and biofouling resistance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes with substrate/active layer modified by graphene oxide
title_sort comparison of performance and biofouling resistance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes with substrate/active layer modified by graphene oxide
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9060938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35518494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8ra08838a
work_keys_str_mv AT liyuan comparisonofperformanceandbiofoulingresistanceofthinfilmcompositeforwardosmosismembraneswithsubstrateactivelayermodifiedbygrapheneoxide
AT yangyu comparisonofperformanceandbiofoulingresistanceofthinfilmcompositeforwardosmosismembraneswithsubstrateactivelayermodifiedbygrapheneoxide
AT lichen comparisonofperformanceandbiofoulingresistanceofthinfilmcompositeforwardosmosismembraneswithsubstrateactivelayermodifiedbygrapheneoxide
AT houlian comparisonofperformanceandbiofoulingresistanceofthinfilmcompositeforwardosmosismembraneswithsubstrateactivelayermodifiedbygrapheneoxide