Cargando…

MINIMA Short Stem Versus Standard Profemur (TL) Stem in Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Comparative Study

Background: The objective of our study was to compare a novel squared section, tapered design - with four conicity - short stem, the MINIMA® short stem with the cementless Profemur® TL standard femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in terms of functional outcomes, radiologic evaluatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tottas, Stylianos, Ververidis, Athanasios, Kougioumtzis, Ioannis, Tilkeridis, Konstantinos, Tsigalou, Christina, Karaglani, Makrina, Drosos, Georgios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9062282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35509762
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23771
_version_ 1784698899603128320
author Tottas, Stylianos
Ververidis, Athanasios
Kougioumtzis, Ioannis
Tilkeridis, Konstantinos
Tsigalou, Christina
Karaglani, Makrina
Drosos, Georgios
author_facet Tottas, Stylianos
Ververidis, Athanasios
Kougioumtzis, Ioannis
Tilkeridis, Konstantinos
Tsigalou, Christina
Karaglani, Makrina
Drosos, Georgios
author_sort Tottas, Stylianos
collection PubMed
description Background: The objective of our study was to compare a novel squared section, tapered design - with four conicity - short stem, the MINIMA® short stem with the cementless Profemur® TL standard femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in terms of functional outcomes, radiologic evaluation and other peri-operative and post-operative data. Material and methods: This is a comparative study including 46 patients undergoing primary THA. In 23 patients, the MINIMA® short stem was used. These patients were matched with another 23 patients in whom a cementless Profemur® TL standard femoral stem was used. The levels of the pain were evaluated according to the Visual Analog Scale/Numerical Rating Scale (VAS/NRS). The functional and clinical evaluation of the patients was performed with Harris Hip Score (HHS), Charnley’s Hip score, EuroQol (EQ-5D)-(EQ-100), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and neuropathic pain questionnaire (DN-4). The rest of the comparison data included demographic data, the American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA), Charlson Index score, the pre-operative diagnosis, radiographic evaluation, the days of hospitalization, the operating time, incision length, blood loss, and blood transfusion requirements and complication rates. Results: The two cohorts had comparable results regarding all patients’ peri-operative data. The radiographic assessment revealed considerable higher levels of femoral offset and femoral subsidence for the MINIMA group, but within acceptable limits for both cohorts. The majority of the functional and other scores did not give strong prominence to one specific femoral stem. Conclusion: Our comparative study underlined the efficacy of the MINIMA® short stem, due to the fact that it revealed comparable and, in some cases, relatively better short-term outcomes compared with the TL standard femoral stem. Yet, more well-designed long-term research is required in order to further establish its effectiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9062282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90622822022-05-03 MINIMA Short Stem Versus Standard Profemur (TL) Stem in Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Comparative Study Tottas, Stylianos Ververidis, Athanasios Kougioumtzis, Ioannis Tilkeridis, Konstantinos Tsigalou, Christina Karaglani, Makrina Drosos, Georgios Cureus Orthopedics Background: The objective of our study was to compare a novel squared section, tapered design - with four conicity - short stem, the MINIMA® short stem with the cementless Profemur® TL standard femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in terms of functional outcomes, radiologic evaluation and other peri-operative and post-operative data. Material and methods: This is a comparative study including 46 patients undergoing primary THA. In 23 patients, the MINIMA® short stem was used. These patients were matched with another 23 patients in whom a cementless Profemur® TL standard femoral stem was used. The levels of the pain were evaluated according to the Visual Analog Scale/Numerical Rating Scale (VAS/NRS). The functional and clinical evaluation of the patients was performed with Harris Hip Score (HHS), Charnley’s Hip score, EuroQol (EQ-5D)-(EQ-100), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and neuropathic pain questionnaire (DN-4). The rest of the comparison data included demographic data, the American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA), Charlson Index score, the pre-operative diagnosis, radiographic evaluation, the days of hospitalization, the operating time, incision length, blood loss, and blood transfusion requirements and complication rates. Results: The two cohorts had comparable results regarding all patients’ peri-operative data. The radiographic assessment revealed considerable higher levels of femoral offset and femoral subsidence for the MINIMA group, but within acceptable limits for both cohorts. The majority of the functional and other scores did not give strong prominence to one specific femoral stem. Conclusion: Our comparative study underlined the efficacy of the MINIMA® short stem, due to the fact that it revealed comparable and, in some cases, relatively better short-term outcomes compared with the TL standard femoral stem. Yet, more well-designed long-term research is required in order to further establish its effectiveness. Cureus 2022-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9062282/ /pubmed/35509762 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23771 Text en Copyright © 2022, Tottas et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Tottas, Stylianos
Ververidis, Athanasios
Kougioumtzis, Ioannis
Tilkeridis, Konstantinos
Tsigalou, Christina
Karaglani, Makrina
Drosos, Georgios
MINIMA Short Stem Versus Standard Profemur (TL) Stem in Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Comparative Study
title MINIMA Short Stem Versus Standard Profemur (TL) Stem in Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Comparative Study
title_full MINIMA Short Stem Versus Standard Profemur (TL) Stem in Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr MINIMA Short Stem Versus Standard Profemur (TL) Stem in Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed MINIMA Short Stem Versus Standard Profemur (TL) Stem in Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Comparative Study
title_short MINIMA Short Stem Versus Standard Profemur (TL) Stem in Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Comparative Study
title_sort minima short stem versus standard profemur (tl) stem in primary total hip replacement: a comparative study
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9062282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35509762
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23771
work_keys_str_mv AT tottasstylianos minimashortstemversusstandardprofemurtlsteminprimarytotalhipreplacementacomparativestudy
AT ververidisathanasios minimashortstemversusstandardprofemurtlsteminprimarytotalhipreplacementacomparativestudy
AT kougioumtzisioannis minimashortstemversusstandardprofemurtlsteminprimarytotalhipreplacementacomparativestudy
AT tilkeridiskonstantinos minimashortstemversusstandardprofemurtlsteminprimarytotalhipreplacementacomparativestudy
AT tsigalouchristina minimashortstemversusstandardprofemurtlsteminprimarytotalhipreplacementacomparativestudy
AT karaglanimakrina minimashortstemversusstandardprofemurtlsteminprimarytotalhipreplacementacomparativestudy
AT drososgeorgios minimashortstemversusstandardprofemurtlsteminprimarytotalhipreplacementacomparativestudy