Cargando…
Access to and quality of sexual and reproductive health services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study of patient experiences
INTRODUCTION: Access to quality sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services remains imperative even during a pandemic. Our objective was to understand experiences of delayed or unsuccessful access to SRH services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: In October and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9062459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35444001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201413 |
_version_ | 1784698946699919360 |
---|---|
author | Bosó Pérez, Raquel Reid, David Maxwell, Karen J Gibbs, Jo Dema, Emily Bonell, Christopher Mercer, Catherine H Sonnenberg, Pam Field, Nigel Mitchell, Kirstin R |
author_facet | Bosó Pérez, Raquel Reid, David Maxwell, Karen J Gibbs, Jo Dema, Emily Bonell, Christopher Mercer, Catherine H Sonnenberg, Pam Field, Nigel Mitchell, Kirstin R |
author_sort | Bosó Pérez, Raquel |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Access to quality sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services remains imperative even during a pandemic. Our objective was to understand experiences of delayed or unsuccessful access to SRH services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: In October and November 2020 we conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 14 women and six men reporting an unmet need for SRH services in the Natsal-COVID survey, a large-scale quasi-representative web-panel survey of sexual health and behaviour during COVID-19 (n=6654). We purposively sampled eligible participants using sociodemographic quotas. Inductive thematic analysis was used to explore service access and quality and to identify lessons for future SRH service delivery. RESULTS: Twenty participants discussed experiences spanning 10 SRH services including contraception and antenatal/maternity care. Participants reported hesitancy and self-censorship of need. Accessing telemedicine and ‘socially-distanced’ services required tenacity. Challenges included navigating changing information and procedures; perceptions of gatekeepers as obstructing access; and inflexible appointment systems. Concerns about reconfigured services included reduced privacy; decreased quality of interactions with professionals; reduced informal support; and fewer preventive SRH practices. However, some participants also described more streamlined services and staff efforts to compensate for disruptions. Many viewed positively the ongoing blending of telemedicine with in-person care. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted access and quality of SRH services. Participants’ accounts revealed self-censorship of need, difficulty navigating shifting service configurations and perceived quality reductions. Telemedicine offers potential if intelligently combined with in-person care. We offer initial evidence-based recommendations for promoting an equitable restoration and future adaption of services. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9062459 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90624592022-05-06 Access to and quality of sexual and reproductive health services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study of patient experiences Bosó Pérez, Raquel Reid, David Maxwell, Karen J Gibbs, Jo Dema, Emily Bonell, Christopher Mercer, Catherine H Sonnenberg, Pam Field, Nigel Mitchell, Kirstin R BMJ Sex Reprod Health Original Research INTRODUCTION: Access to quality sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services remains imperative even during a pandemic. Our objective was to understand experiences of delayed or unsuccessful access to SRH services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: In October and November 2020 we conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 14 women and six men reporting an unmet need for SRH services in the Natsal-COVID survey, a large-scale quasi-representative web-panel survey of sexual health and behaviour during COVID-19 (n=6654). We purposively sampled eligible participants using sociodemographic quotas. Inductive thematic analysis was used to explore service access and quality and to identify lessons for future SRH service delivery. RESULTS: Twenty participants discussed experiences spanning 10 SRH services including contraception and antenatal/maternity care. Participants reported hesitancy and self-censorship of need. Accessing telemedicine and ‘socially-distanced’ services required tenacity. Challenges included navigating changing information and procedures; perceptions of gatekeepers as obstructing access; and inflexible appointment systems. Concerns about reconfigured services included reduced privacy; decreased quality of interactions with professionals; reduced informal support; and fewer preventive SRH practices. However, some participants also described more streamlined services and staff efforts to compensate for disruptions. Many viewed positively the ongoing blending of telemedicine with in-person care. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted access and quality of SRH services. Participants’ accounts revealed self-censorship of need, difficulty navigating shifting service configurations and perceived quality reductions. Telemedicine offers potential if intelligently combined with in-person care. We offer initial evidence-based recommendations for promoting an equitable restoration and future adaption of services. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-01 2022-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9062459/ /pubmed/35444001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201413 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bosó Pérez, Raquel Reid, David Maxwell, Karen J Gibbs, Jo Dema, Emily Bonell, Christopher Mercer, Catherine H Sonnenberg, Pam Field, Nigel Mitchell, Kirstin R Access to and quality of sexual and reproductive health services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study of patient experiences |
title | Access to and quality of sexual and reproductive health services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study of patient experiences |
title_full | Access to and quality of sexual and reproductive health services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study of patient experiences |
title_fullStr | Access to and quality of sexual and reproductive health services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study of patient experiences |
title_full_unstemmed | Access to and quality of sexual and reproductive health services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study of patient experiences |
title_short | Access to and quality of sexual and reproductive health services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study of patient experiences |
title_sort | access to and quality of sexual and reproductive health services in britain during the early stages of the covid-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study of patient experiences |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9062459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35444001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201413 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bosoperezraquel accesstoandqualityofsexualandreproductivehealthservicesinbritainduringtheearlystagesofthecovid19pandemicaqualitativeinterviewstudyofpatientexperiences AT reiddavid accesstoandqualityofsexualandreproductivehealthservicesinbritainduringtheearlystagesofthecovid19pandemicaqualitativeinterviewstudyofpatientexperiences AT maxwellkarenj accesstoandqualityofsexualandreproductivehealthservicesinbritainduringtheearlystagesofthecovid19pandemicaqualitativeinterviewstudyofpatientexperiences AT gibbsjo accesstoandqualityofsexualandreproductivehealthservicesinbritainduringtheearlystagesofthecovid19pandemicaqualitativeinterviewstudyofpatientexperiences AT demaemily accesstoandqualityofsexualandreproductivehealthservicesinbritainduringtheearlystagesofthecovid19pandemicaqualitativeinterviewstudyofpatientexperiences AT bonellchristopher accesstoandqualityofsexualandreproductivehealthservicesinbritainduringtheearlystagesofthecovid19pandemicaqualitativeinterviewstudyofpatientexperiences AT mercercatherineh accesstoandqualityofsexualandreproductivehealthservicesinbritainduringtheearlystagesofthecovid19pandemicaqualitativeinterviewstudyofpatientexperiences AT sonnenbergpam accesstoandqualityofsexualandreproductivehealthservicesinbritainduringtheearlystagesofthecovid19pandemicaqualitativeinterviewstudyofpatientexperiences AT fieldnigel accesstoandqualityofsexualandreproductivehealthservicesinbritainduringtheearlystagesofthecovid19pandemicaqualitativeinterviewstudyofpatientexperiences AT mitchellkirstinr accesstoandqualityofsexualandreproductivehealthservicesinbritainduringtheearlystagesofthecovid19pandemicaqualitativeinterviewstudyofpatientexperiences |