Cargando…

Regional haemodynamic variables and perfusion index in the evaluation of sciatic nerve block: a prospective observational trial

OBJECTIVE: We determined whether regional haemodynamics and perfusion index (PI) could be reliable indicators of a successful sciatic nerve block (SNB). DESIGN: Prospective observational trial. SETTING: A tertiary teaching hospital in China from April 2020 to August 2020. PARTICIPANTS: We assessed 7...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Bo, Jiang, Jingyan, Li, Xiaoyu, Chen, Qingge, Qin, Jinling, Chen, Yun, Chen, Junping, Shen, Qing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9062819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35501099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057283
_version_ 1784699031853727744
author Lu, Bo
Jiang, Jingyan
Li, Xiaoyu
Chen, Qingge
Qin, Jinling
Chen, Yun
Chen, Junping
Shen, Qing
author_facet Lu, Bo
Jiang, Jingyan
Li, Xiaoyu
Chen, Qingge
Qin, Jinling
Chen, Yun
Chen, Junping
Shen, Qing
author_sort Lu, Bo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We determined whether regional haemodynamics and perfusion index (PI) could be reliable indicators of a successful sciatic nerve block (SNB). DESIGN: Prospective observational trial. SETTING: A tertiary teaching hospital in China from April 2020 to August 2020. PARTICIPANTS: We assessed 79 patients for eligibility to participate in this study. Nine patients were excluded for not meeting our inclusion criteria, and three patients were excluded due to missing measurements at all time points. INTERVENTIONS: The patients underwent SNB. Pulsed-wave Doppler and PI measurements were performed. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the diagnostic power of regional haemodynamic change and PI to predict successful SNB. The secondary outcome measure was the effect of SNB on the regional haemodynamics and PI in the lower extremity. RESULTS: We assessed 79 patients in this study and 67 patients available for the final analysis. The SNB was successful in 59 patients and failed in eight patients. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the patients with successful and failed SNB. Starting from 10 min after SNB, the peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity, time-averaged maximum velocity and time-averaged mean velocity of the anterior tibial artery and posterior tibial artery of patients in the successful SNB group were significantly higher than those in the failed SNB group (p<0.05). The PSV percentage increase at 10 min after SNB has great potential to predict the block success. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values were 0.893 (95% CI 0.7809 to 1.000) and 0.880 (95% CI 0.7901 to 0.9699). The corresponding cut-off values were 19.22 and 35.88, respectively. The PI increased during 5–45 min intervals in patients with successful SNB. The AUC for the PI percentage increases at 10 min after SNB was 0.853 (95% CI 0.7035 to 1.000), with a cut-off value of 93.09. CONCLUSION: The regional haemodynamic variables, PSV and PI in particular, can be used as alternative indicators for clinicians to evaluate the success of SNB objectively and early. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2000030772.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9062819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90628192022-05-12 Regional haemodynamic variables and perfusion index in the evaluation of sciatic nerve block: a prospective observational trial Lu, Bo Jiang, Jingyan Li, Xiaoyu Chen, Qingge Qin, Jinling Chen, Yun Chen, Junping Shen, Qing BMJ Open Anaesthesia OBJECTIVE: We determined whether regional haemodynamics and perfusion index (PI) could be reliable indicators of a successful sciatic nerve block (SNB). DESIGN: Prospective observational trial. SETTING: A tertiary teaching hospital in China from April 2020 to August 2020. PARTICIPANTS: We assessed 79 patients for eligibility to participate in this study. Nine patients were excluded for not meeting our inclusion criteria, and three patients were excluded due to missing measurements at all time points. INTERVENTIONS: The patients underwent SNB. Pulsed-wave Doppler and PI measurements were performed. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the diagnostic power of regional haemodynamic change and PI to predict successful SNB. The secondary outcome measure was the effect of SNB on the regional haemodynamics and PI in the lower extremity. RESULTS: We assessed 79 patients in this study and 67 patients available for the final analysis. The SNB was successful in 59 patients and failed in eight patients. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the patients with successful and failed SNB. Starting from 10 min after SNB, the peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity, time-averaged maximum velocity and time-averaged mean velocity of the anterior tibial artery and posterior tibial artery of patients in the successful SNB group were significantly higher than those in the failed SNB group (p<0.05). The PSV percentage increase at 10 min after SNB has great potential to predict the block success. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values were 0.893 (95% CI 0.7809 to 1.000) and 0.880 (95% CI 0.7901 to 0.9699). The corresponding cut-off values were 19.22 and 35.88, respectively. The PI increased during 5–45 min intervals in patients with successful SNB. The AUC for the PI percentage increases at 10 min after SNB was 0.853 (95% CI 0.7035 to 1.000), with a cut-off value of 93.09. CONCLUSION: The regional haemodynamic variables, PSV and PI in particular, can be used as alternative indicators for clinicians to evaluate the success of SNB objectively and early. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2000030772. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9062819/ /pubmed/35501099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057283 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Anaesthesia
Lu, Bo
Jiang, Jingyan
Li, Xiaoyu
Chen, Qingge
Qin, Jinling
Chen, Yun
Chen, Junping
Shen, Qing
Regional haemodynamic variables and perfusion index in the evaluation of sciatic nerve block: a prospective observational trial
title Regional haemodynamic variables and perfusion index in the evaluation of sciatic nerve block: a prospective observational trial
title_full Regional haemodynamic variables and perfusion index in the evaluation of sciatic nerve block: a prospective observational trial
title_fullStr Regional haemodynamic variables and perfusion index in the evaluation of sciatic nerve block: a prospective observational trial
title_full_unstemmed Regional haemodynamic variables and perfusion index in the evaluation of sciatic nerve block: a prospective observational trial
title_short Regional haemodynamic variables and perfusion index in the evaluation of sciatic nerve block: a prospective observational trial
title_sort regional haemodynamic variables and perfusion index in the evaluation of sciatic nerve block: a prospective observational trial
topic Anaesthesia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9062819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35501099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057283
work_keys_str_mv AT lubo regionalhaemodynamicvariablesandperfusionindexintheevaluationofsciaticnerveblockaprospectiveobservationaltrial
AT jiangjingyan regionalhaemodynamicvariablesandperfusionindexintheevaluationofsciaticnerveblockaprospectiveobservationaltrial
AT lixiaoyu regionalhaemodynamicvariablesandperfusionindexintheevaluationofsciaticnerveblockaprospectiveobservationaltrial
AT chenqingge regionalhaemodynamicvariablesandperfusionindexintheevaluationofsciaticnerveblockaprospectiveobservationaltrial
AT qinjinling regionalhaemodynamicvariablesandperfusionindexintheevaluationofsciaticnerveblockaprospectiveobservationaltrial
AT chenyun regionalhaemodynamicvariablesandperfusionindexintheevaluationofsciaticnerveblockaprospectiveobservationaltrial
AT chenjunping regionalhaemodynamicvariablesandperfusionindexintheevaluationofsciaticnerveblockaprospectiveobservationaltrial
AT shenqing regionalhaemodynamicvariablesandperfusionindexintheevaluationofsciaticnerveblockaprospectiveobservationaltrial