Cargando…

Ponte osteotomies increase risk of intraoperative neuromonitoring alerts in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery

BACKGROUND: Ponte osteotomies (PO) are commonly used in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgeries to improve the coronal and sagittal deformity correction. Here, we compared the incidence of perioperative neurologic complications for patients undergoing AIS with versus without PO. METHODS: In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harfouch, Elamir Bachar, Bunyan, Reem Fahd, Faraidy, Mona Al, Alnemari, Haitham H., Bashir, Shahid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9062905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35509562
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_67_2022
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Ponte osteotomies (PO) are commonly used in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgeries to improve the coronal and sagittal deformity correction. Here, we compared the incidence of perioperative neurologic complications for patients undergoing AIS with versus without PO. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study of 80 consecutive AIS patients undergoing scoliosis correction, 40 underwent PO, while 40 did not. All operations were performed by one surgeon at one tertiary care center. Patients’ demographics, Lenke classifications, surgical data, and deformity characteristics were comparable in both groups. Perioperative neurologic complications, defined as spinal cord or nerve root injuries identified by the surgeon, were tracked for those undergoing AIS surgery with or without PO being performed. RESULTS: The risk of IOM alerts was significantly higher in the PO patients (12.5%: 5 patients) versus those in the No-PO group (0%, P = 0.021). Despite these changes, no patient incurred an increased postoperative deficit. Nevertheless, PO group patients demonstrated a higher coronal deformity correction rate (PO: 71% ± 10.9 vs. NoPO: 64.2% ± 11.5, P = 0.008) and a greater kyphosis Cobb angle (PO: 25.2 ± 6 vs. No-PO: 17.5 ± 9.4, P = 0.0001) on postoperative follow-up. CONCLUSION: While PO improved 3D correction of AIS, it increased the risk of IOM alerts in 12.5% of cases.